Personalized interventions for behaviour change: A scoping review of just-in-time adaptive interventions

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Ting-Chen Chloe Hsu, Pauline Whelan, Julie Gandrup, Christopher J. Armitage, Lis Cordingley, John McBeth
{"title":"Personalized interventions for behaviour change: A scoping review of just-in-time adaptive interventions","authors":"Ting-Chen Chloe Hsu,&nbsp;Pauline Whelan,&nbsp;Julie Gandrup,&nbsp;Christopher J. Armitage,&nbsp;Lis Cordingley,&nbsp;John McBeth","doi":"10.1111/bjhp.12766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Examine the development, implementation and evaluation of just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) in behaviour change and evaluate the quality of intervention reporting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A scoping review of JITAIs incorporating mobile health (mHealth) technologies to improve health-related behaviours in adults. We searched MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO using terms related to JITAIs, mHealth, behaviour change and intervention methodology. Narrative analysis assessed theoretical foundations, real-time data capturing and processing methods, outcome evaluation and summarized JITAI efficacy. Quality of intervention reporting was assessed using the template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Sixty-two JITAIs across physical activity, sedentary behaviour, dietary behaviour, substance use, sexual behaviour, fluid intake, treatment adherence, social skills, gambling behaviour and self-management skills were included. The majority (71%) aimed to evaluate feasibility, acceptability and/or usability. Supporting evidence for JITAI development was identified in 46 studies, with 67% applying this to develop tailored intervention content. Over half (55%) relied solely on self-reported data for tailoring, and 13 studies used only passive monitoring data. While data processing methods were commonly reported, 44% did not specify their techniques. 89% of JITAI designs achieved full marks on the TIDieR checklist and provided sufficient details on JITAI components. Overall, JITAIs proved to be feasible, acceptable and user-friendly across behaviours and settings. Randomized trials showed tailored interventions were efficacious, though outcomes varied by behaviour.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>JITAIs offer a promising approach to developing personalized interventions, with their potential effects continuously growing. The recommended checklist emphasizes the importance of reporting transparency in establishing robust intervention designs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48161,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Psychology","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11583291/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12766","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Examine the development, implementation and evaluation of just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) in behaviour change and evaluate the quality of intervention reporting.

Methods

A scoping review of JITAIs incorporating mobile health (mHealth) technologies to improve health-related behaviours in adults. We searched MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO using terms related to JITAIs, mHealth, behaviour change and intervention methodology. Narrative analysis assessed theoretical foundations, real-time data capturing and processing methods, outcome evaluation and summarized JITAI efficacy. Quality of intervention reporting was assessed using the template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist.

Results

Sixty-two JITAIs across physical activity, sedentary behaviour, dietary behaviour, substance use, sexual behaviour, fluid intake, treatment adherence, social skills, gambling behaviour and self-management skills were included. The majority (71%) aimed to evaluate feasibility, acceptability and/or usability. Supporting evidence for JITAI development was identified in 46 studies, with 67% applying this to develop tailored intervention content. Over half (55%) relied solely on self-reported data for tailoring, and 13 studies used only passive monitoring data. While data processing methods were commonly reported, 44% did not specify their techniques. 89% of JITAI designs achieved full marks on the TIDieR checklist and provided sufficient details on JITAI components. Overall, JITAIs proved to be feasible, acceptable and user-friendly across behaviours and settings. Randomized trials showed tailored interventions were efficacious, though outcomes varied by behaviour.

Conclusions

JITAIs offer a promising approach to developing personalized interventions, with their potential effects continuously growing. The recommended checklist emphasizes the importance of reporting transparency in establishing robust intervention designs.

Abstract Image

改变行为的个性化干预措施:对适时适应性干预措施的范围审查。
目的:研究行为改变方面的及时适应性干预(JITAIs)的开发、实施和评估,并评估干预报告的质量:方法:对采用移动医疗(mHealth)技术改善成人健康相关行为的即时适应性干预进行范围界定。我们使用与JITAIs、移动医疗、行为改变和干预方法相关的术语对MEDLINE、Embase和PsycINFO进行了检索。叙事分析评估了理论基础、实时数据采集和处理方法、结果评估以及 JITAI 的疗效总结。干预报告的质量采用干预描述和复制模板(TIDieR)清单进行评估:共纳入了 62 项 JITAI,涉及体育锻炼、久坐行为、饮食行为、药物使用、性行为、液体摄入、坚持治疗、社交技能、赌博行为和自我管理技能。大部分(71%)旨在评估可行性、可接受性和/或可用性。在 46 项研究中发现了开发 JITAI 的支持性证据,其中 67% 将其用于开发定制的干预内容。半数以上(55%)的研究仅依靠自我报告数据进行定制,13 项研究仅使用被动监测数据。虽然普遍报告了数据处理方法,但 44% 的研究没有具体说明其技术。89% 的 JITAI 设计在 TIDieR 核对表中获得满分,并提供了有关 JITAI 组成部分的足够详细信息。总体而言,在不同的行为和环境下,综合技援方案被证明是可行的、可接受的和用户友好的。随机试验表明,量身定制的干预措施是有效的,尽管结果因行为而异:结论:JITAIs 为开发个性化干预措施提供了一种前景广阔的方法,其潜在效果正在不断增强。建议的清单强调了报告透明度在建立健全的干预设计中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Health Psychology
British Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
1.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The focus of the British Journal of Health Psychology is to publish original research on various aspects of psychology that are related to health, health-related behavior, and illness throughout a person's life. The journal specifically seeks articles that are based on health psychology theory or discuss theoretical matters within the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信