Formative qualitative research to guide implementation of the Collaborative Care Model in a low-barrier HIV clinic.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Scott Halliday, Julia C Dombrowski, Ramona Emerson, Kristin Beima-Sofie, Lydia A Chwastiak, Kenneth Sherr, Judith I Tsui, Bradley H Wagenaar, Deepa Rao
{"title":"Formative qualitative research to guide implementation of the Collaborative Care Model in a low-barrier HIV clinic.","authors":"Scott Halliday, Julia C Dombrowski, Ramona Emerson, Kristin Beima-Sofie, Lydia A Chwastiak, Kenneth Sherr, Judith I Tsui, Bradley H Wagenaar, Deepa Rao","doi":"10.1080/09540121.2024.2411296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Integrated behavioral healthcare interventions have increased access to care for people with behavioral health conditions in primary care settings. However, they have not been widely implemented in low-barrier HIV care settings where undertreated behavioral health needs remain high. We conducted a formative qualitative evaluation, using in-depth interviews with purposively selected stakeholders (<i>n</i> = 13) and patients (<i>n</i> = 16), to identify anticipated barriers and facilitators to integrating care for depression and opioid use disorder for people with HIV via the Collaborative Care Model at a low-barrier HIV clinic. Patients and stakeholders expressed their enthusiasm for the Collaborative Care Model based on its perceived relative advantage over the standard of care referral system. Availability of resources, practical concerns about perceived fit with low-barrier HIV care, and anticipated suitability given other behavioral health comorbidities and patients' complex socioeconomic needs partially tempered stakeholder perceptions of appropriateness for the Collaborative Care Model. Patients and service delivery stakeholders were receptive to the Collaborative Care Model, but felt it was moderately appropriate in the context of low-barrier HIV care, which necessitated key adaptations to core model components to improve its contextual fit.</p>","PeriodicalId":48370,"journal":{"name":"Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2024.2411296","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integrated behavioral healthcare interventions have increased access to care for people with behavioral health conditions in primary care settings. However, they have not been widely implemented in low-barrier HIV care settings where undertreated behavioral health needs remain high. We conducted a formative qualitative evaluation, using in-depth interviews with purposively selected stakeholders (n = 13) and patients (n = 16), to identify anticipated barriers and facilitators to integrating care for depression and opioid use disorder for people with HIV via the Collaborative Care Model at a low-barrier HIV clinic. Patients and stakeholders expressed their enthusiasm for the Collaborative Care Model based on its perceived relative advantage over the standard of care referral system. Availability of resources, practical concerns about perceived fit with low-barrier HIV care, and anticipated suitability given other behavioral health comorbidities and patients' complex socioeconomic needs partially tempered stakeholder perceptions of appropriateness for the Collaborative Care Model. Patients and service delivery stakeholders were receptive to the Collaborative Care Model, but felt it was moderately appropriate in the context of low-barrier HIV care, which necessitated key adaptations to core model components to improve its contextual fit.

开展形成性定性研究,为在一家低门槛艾滋病诊所实施协作护理模式提供指导。
综合行为医疗干预措施增加了初级医疗机构中行为健康患者获得医疗服务的机会。然而,这些干预措施尚未在低门槛的艾滋病护理环境中广泛实施,而在这些环境中,未得到治疗的行为健康需求仍然很高。我们开展了一项形成性定性评估,通过对有目的性地挑选出的利益相关者(n = 13)和患者(n = 16)进行深入访谈,以确定在一家低门槛艾滋病诊所通过协作护理模式为艾滋病患者整合抑郁症和阿片类药物使用障碍护理的预期障碍和促进因素。患者和利益相关者对合作护理模式表示出极大的热情,因为他们认为该模式与标准护理转介系统相比具有相对优势。资源的可获得性、与低障碍艾滋病护理相适应的实际顾虑,以及考虑到其他行为健康合并症和患者复杂的社会经济需求的预期适宜性,在一定程度上削弱了利益相关者对协作式护理模式适宜性的看法。患者和提供服务的利益相关者对协作式护理模式持接受态度,但认为该模式在低障碍艾滋病护理环境下的适用性一般,因此有必要对该模式的核心组成部分进行关键调整,以改善其环境适应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
172
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信