Nurses' models of spiritual care: Predictors of spiritual care competence.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Rita Mascio, Sandra Lynch, Jane L Phillips, Megan Best
{"title":"Nurses' models of spiritual care: Predictors of spiritual care competence.","authors":"Rita Mascio, Sandra Lynch, Jane L Phillips, Megan Best","doi":"10.1017/S1478951524000750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Previous studies have shown that nurses' spiritual care competence is related to characteristics of personal spirituality, training adequacy, and comfort, confidence, and frequency of provision of spiritual care. However, these studies assumed that all participants understood spiritual care in the same way, and used self-ratings of spiritual care competence, which are problematic. Our previous study found that spiritual care was understood in 4 qualitatively different ways that can be arranged in order of competence. This study aimed to re-examine the relationships between nurse characteristics and spiritual care competence, using spiritual care understanding as a proxy for competence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was collected from a convenience sample of nurses who completed an anonymous, online survey. The survey provided qualitative data about what spiritual care means for them. The survey also provided quantitative data regarding nurse characteristics. This study created sub-groups of nurses based on their understanding of spiritual care, and used the quantitative data to construct a profile of nurse characteristics for each sub-group. Kruskal-Wallis statistical tests determined whether nurse characteristics differed across the 4 sub-groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Spiritual care competence was not related to confidence or comfort in providing spiritual care. Relationships with spirituality, training adequacy, and frequency of provision of spiritual care were not linear; i.e., higher competence did not always correspond with higher scores of these characteristics.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>The results raise concerns about the construct validity of using comfort and confidence as estimates of spiritual care competence. That the relationships between competence and spirituality, training adequacy, and frequency of spiritual care provision was not as linear as portrayed in extant literature, suggests that outcomes of training may depend on the type of spiritual care understanding subscribed to by training participants. The findings offer insights about how nurses could achieve high levels of spiritual care performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951524000750","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Previous studies have shown that nurses' spiritual care competence is related to characteristics of personal spirituality, training adequacy, and comfort, confidence, and frequency of provision of spiritual care. However, these studies assumed that all participants understood spiritual care in the same way, and used self-ratings of spiritual care competence, which are problematic. Our previous study found that spiritual care was understood in 4 qualitatively different ways that can be arranged in order of competence. This study aimed to re-examine the relationships between nurse characteristics and spiritual care competence, using spiritual care understanding as a proxy for competence.

Methods: Data was collected from a convenience sample of nurses who completed an anonymous, online survey. The survey provided qualitative data about what spiritual care means for them. The survey also provided quantitative data regarding nurse characteristics. This study created sub-groups of nurses based on their understanding of spiritual care, and used the quantitative data to construct a profile of nurse characteristics for each sub-group. Kruskal-Wallis statistical tests determined whether nurse characteristics differed across the 4 sub-groups.

Results: Spiritual care competence was not related to confidence or comfort in providing spiritual care. Relationships with spirituality, training adequacy, and frequency of provision of spiritual care were not linear; i.e., higher competence did not always correspond with higher scores of these characteristics.

Significance of results: The results raise concerns about the construct validity of using comfort and confidence as estimates of spiritual care competence. That the relationships between competence and spirituality, training adequacy, and frequency of spiritual care provision was not as linear as portrayed in extant literature, suggests that outcomes of training may depend on the type of spiritual care understanding subscribed to by training participants. The findings offer insights about how nurses could achieve high levels of spiritual care performance.

护士的心灵关怀模式:精神护理能力的预测因素。
目的:以往的研究表明,护士的灵性关怀能力与个人灵性特征、培训的充分性以及提供灵性关怀的舒适度、信心和频率有关。然而,这些研究假定所有参与者都以同样的方式理解灵性关怀,并使用自我灵性关怀能力评分,这是有问题的。我们之前的研究发现,灵性关怀有四种不同的理解方式,可以按照能力高低排列。本研究旨在重新审视护士特征与灵性关怀能力之间的关系,将灵性关怀理解作为能力的替代指标:方法:本研究从方便抽样的护士中收集数据,这些护士完成了一项匿名在线调查。调查提供了有关心灵关怀对护士的意义的定性数据。调查还提供了有关护士特征的定量数据。本研究根据护士对心灵关怀的理解创建了护士子群,并利用定量数据为每个子群构建了护士特征档案。Kruskal-Wallis 统计检验确定了 4 个分组的护士特征是否存在差异:灵性关怀能力与提供灵性关怀的信心或舒适度无关。与灵性、培训充分性和提供灵性关怀的频率之间的关系不是线性的;也就是说,能力越高并不总是与这些特征的得分越高相对应:结果令人担忧用舒适感和自信心来估计灵性关怀能力的建构有效性。能力与灵性、培训的充分性以及提供灵性照护的频率之间的关系并不像现有文献中描述的那样呈线性关系,这表明培训的结果可能取决于培训参与者对灵性照护理解的类型。研究结果为护士如何实现高水平的灵性关怀提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信