Hand reanimation: functional free gracilis transfer or transfer of the distal tendon of the biceps to the flexor digitorum profundus and flexor pollicis longus as surgical options.

IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Einstein-Sao Paulo Pub Date : 2024-11-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0719
Raquel Bernardelli Iamaguchi, Maria Virginia Arranz, Rames Mattar Junior
{"title":"Hand reanimation: functional free gracilis transfer or transfer of the distal tendon of the biceps to the flexor digitorum profundus and flexor pollicis longus as surgical options.","authors":"Raquel Bernardelli Iamaguchi, Maria Virginia Arranz, Rames Mattar Junior","doi":"10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Hand reanimation for finger flexion in patients with total paralysis remains a reconstructive challenge, especially when tendon transfers or neurological reconstruction options are no longer viable. This study aimed to describe a series of patients without hand function by evaluating two hand reanimation techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational retrospective study used a case series of hand reanimation. Two techniques were performed-functional free gracilis muscle transfer with microsurgical reconstruction, and transfer of the recovered biceps to the flexor digitorum profundus and flexor pollicis longus with tendon graft augmentation. The two groups, each undergoing one of the techniques, were evaluated for the final functional results using the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) grading system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six consecutive patients with total hand paralysis were included, with a mean final follow-up of 7.5 years. After intervention, two patients, one from each technique group, achieved a BMRC grade 2. In the group where tendon transfer of the biceps to the finger flexors was performed, two patients achieved a BMRC grade 3. Additionally, two patients who underwent functional free muscle transfer were achieved a BMRC grade 4.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The transfer of biceps to the finger flexors using tendon grafts, which involves fewer technical difficulties and reduced demands from the surgical team compared to functional free muscle transfer, is a viable alternative for treating patients requiring hand reanimation. However, functional free muscle transfer is recommended as the first option when technically feasible and adequate donor nerves are available, due to its potential for achieving greater final muscular strength in the finger flexors. Reconstructive microsurgeons can use both techniques as viable surgical options for hand reanimation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47359,"journal":{"name":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Hand reanimation for finger flexion in patients with total paralysis remains a reconstructive challenge, especially when tendon transfers or neurological reconstruction options are no longer viable. This study aimed to describe a series of patients without hand function by evaluating two hand reanimation techniques.

Methods: This observational retrospective study used a case series of hand reanimation. Two techniques were performed-functional free gracilis muscle transfer with microsurgical reconstruction, and transfer of the recovered biceps to the flexor digitorum profundus and flexor pollicis longus with tendon graft augmentation. The two groups, each undergoing one of the techniques, were evaluated for the final functional results using the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) grading system.

Results: Six consecutive patients with total hand paralysis were included, with a mean final follow-up of 7.5 years. After intervention, two patients, one from each technique group, achieved a BMRC grade 2. In the group where tendon transfer of the biceps to the finger flexors was performed, two patients achieved a BMRC grade 3. Additionally, two patients who underwent functional free muscle transfer were achieved a BMRC grade 4.

Conclusion: The transfer of biceps to the finger flexors using tendon grafts, which involves fewer technical difficulties and reduced demands from the surgical team compared to functional free muscle transfer, is a viable alternative for treating patients requiring hand reanimation. However, functional free muscle transfer is recommended as the first option when technically feasible and adequate donor nerves are available, due to its potential for achieving greater final muscular strength in the finger flexors. Reconstructive microsurgeons can use both techniques as viable surgical options for hand reanimation.

手部复位:功能性游离腓肠肌转移或将肱二头肌远端肌腱转移至屈指肌和屈股肌作为手术选择。
目的:全瘫患者手指屈曲的手部复位仍然是一项重建挑战,尤其是在肌腱转移或神经重建方案不再可行的情况下。本研究旨在通过评估两种手部复位技术,描述一系列无手部功能患者的情况:这项观察性回顾研究采用了一系列手部再植病例。研究采用了两种技术--功能性游离腓肠肌转移和显微外科重建,以及将恢复后的肱二头肌转移到屈指肌和屈股肌并进行肌腱移植增强。采用英国医学研究委员会(BMRC)的分级系统对两组患者分别采用其中一种技术的最终功能效果进行评估:结果:连续纳入了六名手部完全瘫痪的患者,平均随访时间为 7.5 年。干预后,两组各有一名患者达到了 BMRC 2 级。在将肱二头肌肌腱转移到指屈肌的组别中,有两名患者的 BMRC 达到了 3 级。此外,两名接受功能性游离肌肉转移的患者达到了 BMRC 4 级:结论:与功能性游离肌肉转移相比,使用肌腱移植将肱二头肌转移至指屈肌涉及的技术难度更低,对手术团队的要求也更低,是治疗需要手部复位的患者的可行替代方案。不过,在技术可行且有足够供体神经的情况下,建议将功能性游离肌肉移植作为首选,因为它有可能使手指屈肌最终获得更大的肌肉力量。整形显微外科医生可以将这两种技术作为手部复位的可行手术方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Einstein-Sao Paulo
Einstein-Sao Paulo MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
210
审稿时长
38 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信