Prenatal representations link pregnancy intention to observed caregiving.

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Lauren G Bailes, Brooke Fleming, Juelle Ford, Micaela Macfarlane, Casey Carrow, Charles H Zeanah, Kathryn L Humphreys
{"title":"Prenatal representations link pregnancy intention to observed caregiving.","authors":"Lauren G Bailes, Brooke Fleming, Juelle Ford, Micaela Macfarlane, Casey Carrow, Charles H Zeanah, Kathryn L Humphreys","doi":"10.1080/02646838.2024.2424927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims/background: </strong>Children from unintended pregnancies are at an increased risk of experiencing less positive parenting practices as well as abuse and neglect. Thus, identifying factors that may explain the association between pregnancy intention and caregiving behaviours is critical, as well as identifying if these associations can be assessed during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Design/methods: </strong>In a sample of 297 pregnant people (M<sub>age</sub> = 31.17, SD = 4.89; gestational age range 9.71-35.14, <i>M</i> = 23.55, SD = 5.54) and, later, their 6-month-old infants, this prospective study examined the degree to which two facets (i.e. acceptance and richness of perceptions of the child and their role in being a parent for that child) of caregivers' prenatal mental representations of the child explained the association between pregnancy intention and the caregiver behaviour observed during caregiver - child interactions in infancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated that caregiver-child interactions following pregnancies that were intended, relative to those non-intended, were rated as higher in caregiving sensitivity and warmth. These relations were explained, in part, by a greater richness of perceptions, but not through acceptance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest richness of perceptions as a potential target for exploration in interventions to support pregnant people who were not intending to become pregnant as a means to promote positive caregiver - child relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":47721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2024.2424927","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/background: Children from unintended pregnancies are at an increased risk of experiencing less positive parenting practices as well as abuse and neglect. Thus, identifying factors that may explain the association between pregnancy intention and caregiving behaviours is critical, as well as identifying if these associations can be assessed during pregnancy.

Design/methods: In a sample of 297 pregnant people (Mage = 31.17, SD = 4.89; gestational age range 9.71-35.14, M = 23.55, SD = 5.54) and, later, their 6-month-old infants, this prospective study examined the degree to which two facets (i.e. acceptance and richness of perceptions of the child and their role in being a parent for that child) of caregivers' prenatal mental representations of the child explained the association between pregnancy intention and the caregiver behaviour observed during caregiver - child interactions in infancy.

Results: Results indicated that caregiver-child interactions following pregnancies that were intended, relative to those non-intended, were rated as higher in caregiving sensitivity and warmth. These relations were explained, in part, by a greater richness of perceptions, but not through acceptance.

Conclusion: Findings suggest richness of perceptions as a potential target for exploration in interventions to support pregnant people who were not intending to become pregnant as a means to promote positive caregiver - child relationships.

产前表征将怀孕意向与观察到的护理联系起来。
目的/背景:意外怀孕的儿童遭受较不积极的养育行为以及虐待和忽视的风险较高。因此,确定可能解释怀孕意愿与照顾行为之间关联的因素至关重要,同时确定这些关联是否可以在怀孕期间进行评估:本前瞻性研究以 297 名孕妇(年龄 = 31.17,SD = 4.89;孕龄范围为 9.71-35.14,M = 23.55,SD = 5.54)及其 6 个月大的婴儿为样本,考察了两个方面(即:接受度和丰富度)的程度。这项前瞻性研究考察了照料者产前对孩子的心理表征的两个方面(即对孩子的接受度和丰富度以及他们作为孩子父母的角色)在多大程度上解释了怀孕意愿与婴儿期照料者与孩子互动过程中观察到的照料者行为之间的关联:结果表明,相对于非计划怀孕,计划怀孕后照顾者与儿童的互动在照顾敏感度和温暖度方面的评分更高。这些关系的部分原因是感知更丰富,而不是接受:研究结果表明,在为无意怀孕的孕妇提供支持的干预措施中,丰富的感知是一个潜在的探索目标,是促进积极的照顾者与儿童关系的一种手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology reports and reviews outstanding research on psychological, behavioural, medical and social aspects of human reproduction, pregnancy and infancy. Medical topics focus on obstetrics and gynaecology, paediatrics and psychiatry. The growing work in relevant aspects of medical communication and medical sociology are also covered. Relevant psychological work includes developmental psychology, clinical psychology, social psychology, behavioural medicine, psychology of women and health psychology. Research into psychological aspects of midwifery, health visiting and nursing is central to the interests of the Journal. The Journal is of special value to those concerned with interdisciplinary issues. As a result, the Journal is of particular interest to those concerned with fundamental processes in behaviour and to issues of health promotion and service organization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信