Synergies and dis-synergies between universal health coverage and global health security: A case study of Cambodia.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Lo Yan Esabelle Yam, Pheak Chhoun, Di Liang, Jiayan Huang, Siyan Yi
{"title":"Synergies and dis-synergies between universal health coverage and global health security: A case study of Cambodia.","authors":"Lo Yan Esabelle Yam, Pheak Chhoun, Di Liang, Jiayan Huang, Siyan Yi","doi":"10.7189/jogh.14.04218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the global community's increased focus on pandemic preparedness has driven efforts such as the Pandemic Treaty proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Pandemic Fund managed by the World Bank. While these initiatives will enhance countries' capabilities in pandemic preparedness, synergies could be achieved by exploring the intersections between universal health coverage (UHC) and global health security (GHS). This is particularly relevant for developing countries like Cambodia. As it transitions to higher income status and reduces its reliance on external funding, the synergistic development of UHC and GHS will help Cambodia maximise health investment and align with its population health goals. We aimed to identify synergies and dis-synergies between UHC and GHS and recommend implementations that the government can consider moving forward.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a rapid review of policy documents based on the World Health Organization (WHO) Health System Framework and undertook consultations with key stakeholders in Cambodia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings show the synergies between the two agendas in Cambodia resulted from having a central coordinating authority through the Ministry of Health (MoH), an extensive primary care network, and intersecting human resources that drive both UHC and GHS. We also identified potential dis-synergies such as vertical programmes and funding sources, inadequate regulation and engagement of the private sector, and underutilisation of information and data. Recommendations include cross-consultations between departments within the MoH when developing policies in GHC or UHC, and training programmes to increase awareness of the synergies between UHC and GHS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings reinforce those of previous case studies in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Ghana, offering recommendations for building resilient health systems by integrating UHC and GHS.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"14 ","pages":"04218"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11563567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.04218","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: After the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the global community's increased focus on pandemic preparedness has driven efforts such as the Pandemic Treaty proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Pandemic Fund managed by the World Bank. While these initiatives will enhance countries' capabilities in pandemic preparedness, synergies could be achieved by exploring the intersections between universal health coverage (UHC) and global health security (GHS). This is particularly relevant for developing countries like Cambodia. As it transitions to higher income status and reduces its reliance on external funding, the synergistic development of UHC and GHS will help Cambodia maximise health investment and align with its population health goals. We aimed to identify synergies and dis-synergies between UHC and GHS and recommend implementations that the government can consider moving forward.

Methods: We conducted a rapid review of policy documents based on the World Health Organization (WHO) Health System Framework and undertook consultations with key stakeholders in Cambodia.

Results: Our findings show the synergies between the two agendas in Cambodia resulted from having a central coordinating authority through the Ministry of Health (MoH), an extensive primary care network, and intersecting human resources that drive both UHC and GHS. We also identified potential dis-synergies such as vertical programmes and funding sources, inadequate regulation and engagement of the private sector, and underutilisation of information and data. Recommendations include cross-consultations between departments within the MoH when developing policies in GHC or UHC, and training programmes to increase awareness of the synergies between UHC and GHS.

Conclusions: Our findings reinforce those of previous case studies in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Ghana, offering recommendations for building resilient health systems by integrating UHC and GHS.

全民医保与全球卫生安全之间的协同作用和不协同作用:柬埔寨案例研究。
背景:在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行之后,全球社会更加关注大流行病的防备工作,推动了世界卫生组织(WHO)提出的《大流行病条约》和世界银行管理的大流行病基金等工作的开展。尽管这些举措将提高各国防范大流行病的能力,但通过探索全民医保(UHC)与全球卫生安全(GHS)之间的交叉点,可以实现协同增效。这对柬埔寨这样的发展中国家尤为重要。随着柬埔寨向高收入国家过渡并减少对外部资金的依赖,全民医保和全球卫生安全的协同发展将有助于柬埔寨最大限度地增加卫生投资并实现其人口健康目标。我们的目标是确定全民健康计划和普通保健服务之间的协同作用和不协同作用,并提出政府可以考虑的实施建议:我们根据世界卫生组织(WHO)卫生系统框架对政策文件进行了快速审查,并与柬埔寨的主要利益相关者进行了磋商:我们的研究结果表明,在柬埔寨,通过卫生部(MoH)的中央协调机构、广泛的初级保健网络以及推动全民健康计划和普通保健服务的相互交叉的人力资源,这两项议程之间产生了协同效应。我们还发现了潜在的不协同问题,如纵向计划和资金来源、对私营部门的监管和参与不足,以及信息和数据利用不足。我们提出的建议包括卫生部内部各部门在制定普通保健服务或统一保健服务政策时进行交叉协商,以及开展培训计划以提高对统一保健服务和普通保健服务之间协同作用的认识:我们的研究结果加强了之前在孟加拉国、埃塞俄比亚和加纳进行的案例研究,为通过整合统一健康标准和全球统一健康标准来建设具有复原力的卫生系统提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信