Prevalence and risk factors for Achilles tendon rupture in the military population from 2006 to 2015: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
John J Fraser, J A Zellers, C K Sullivan, C F Janney
{"title":"Prevalence and risk factors for Achilles tendon rupture in the military population from 2006 to 2015: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"John J Fraser, J A Zellers, C K Sullivan, C F Janney","doi":"10.1136/military-2024-002759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) is a serious musculoskeletal injury that results in substantial functional decline, especially in highly physically demanding occupations such as service in the military. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the prevalence and associated factors of ATR in US military service members.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Defence Medical Epidemiology Database was used to identify all diagnosed ATR in military personnel from 2006 to 2015. The prevalence of ATR was calculated and compared by year, service branch and military rank. Unadjusted and adjusted assessments of risk were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Officers incurred 15 978 episodes at a prevalence of 7.43/1000 (male: 8.11/1000; female: 3.89/1000). Among enlisted personnel, there were 59 242 episodes of ATR that occurred at a prevalence of 6.23 episodes per 1000 (male enlisted: 6.49/1000; female enlisted: 4.48/1000). Apart from enlisted aviation specialists (where there was no significant difference in risk between men and women), both female officers and enlisted service members had significantly lower risk of ATR compared with their male counterparts in all occupations (prevalence ratio (PR): 0.26-0.73). Aviation and service officers demonstrated significantly lower risk of ATR episodes (PR: 0.87-0.91) and administration, operations, intelligence and logistic officers demonstrated increased risk (PR: 1.16-1.31) compared with ground and naval gunfire officers. Among enlisted specialties, all but mechanised/armour and combat engineers had significantly higher risk of ATR risk compared with infantry (PR: 1.14-2.13), with the highest risk observed in the administration, intelligence and communication fields.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ATR was ubiquitous in the US military, with multiple risk factors identified, including male sex, older age, rank, military occupation and service branch. These findings highlight the populations that can most greatly benefit from preventive screening and care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48485,"journal":{"name":"Bmj Military Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bmj Military Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2024-002759","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) is a serious musculoskeletal injury that results in substantial functional decline, especially in highly physically demanding occupations such as service in the military. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the prevalence and associated factors of ATR in US military service members.

Methods: The Defence Medical Epidemiology Database was used to identify all diagnosed ATR in military personnel from 2006 to 2015. The prevalence of ATR was calculated and compared by year, service branch and military rank. Unadjusted and adjusted assessments of risk were calculated.

Results: Officers incurred 15 978 episodes at a prevalence of 7.43/1000 (male: 8.11/1000; female: 3.89/1000). Among enlisted personnel, there were 59 242 episodes of ATR that occurred at a prevalence of 6.23 episodes per 1000 (male enlisted: 6.49/1000; female enlisted: 4.48/1000). Apart from enlisted aviation specialists (where there was no significant difference in risk between men and women), both female officers and enlisted service members had significantly lower risk of ATR compared with their male counterparts in all occupations (prevalence ratio (PR): 0.26-0.73). Aviation and service officers demonstrated significantly lower risk of ATR episodes (PR: 0.87-0.91) and administration, operations, intelligence and logistic officers demonstrated increased risk (PR: 1.16-1.31) compared with ground and naval gunfire officers. Among enlisted specialties, all but mechanised/armour and combat engineers had significantly higher risk of ATR risk compared with infantry (PR: 1.14-2.13), with the highest risk observed in the administration, intelligence and communication fields.

Conclusions: ATR was ubiquitous in the US military, with multiple risk factors identified, including male sex, older age, rank, military occupation and service branch. These findings highlight the populations that can most greatly benefit from preventive screening and care.

2006 年至 2015 年军人跟腱断裂的发病率和风险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
简介跟腱断裂(ATR)是一种严重的肌肉骨骼损伤,会导致机能大幅下降,尤其是在军队等对体力要求很高的职业中。这项回顾性队列研究的目的是评估美国军人 ATR 的患病率和相关因素:方法:使用国防医学流行病学数据库来识别 2006 年至 2015 年期间所有确诊为 ATR 的军人。按年份、军种和军衔计算并比较 ATR 的患病率。计算了未调整和调整后的风险评估:军官共发生 15 978 次,发生率为 7.43/1000 (男性:8.11/1000;女性:3.89/1000)。在士兵中,ATR 发生了 59 242 次,发生率为 6.23/1000(男性士兵:6.49/1000;女性士兵:4.48/1000)。除入伍航空专家(男女风险无显著差异)外,在所有职业中,女军官和女兵发生 ATR 的风险均显著低于男兵(流行率 (PR):0.26-0.73):0.26-0.73).与地面军官和海军炮兵军官相比,航空和勤务军官发生 ATR 的风险明显较低(患病率比:0.87-0.91),而行政、作战、情报和后勤军官发生 ATR 的风险较高(患病率比:1.16-1.31)。在士兵专业中,与步兵相比,除机械/装甲兵和战斗工兵外,其他所有专业的 ATR 风险都明显较高(PR:1.14-2.13),其中行政、情报和通信专业的风险最高:ATR在美军中无处不在,有多种风险因素,包括男性性别、年龄、军衔、军事职业和军种。这些发现凸显了从预防性筛查和护理中获益最大的人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bmj Military Health
Bmj Military Health MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
116
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信