[Translated article] Surgical treatment of ipsilateral bifocal tibial fractures: a challenge for the surgeon.

Q3 Medicine
Amparo Ortega-Yago, Mariano Barrés-Carsí, Antonio Balfagón-Ferrer
{"title":"[Translated article] Surgical treatment of ipsilateral bifocal tibial fractures: a challenge for the surgeon.","authors":"Amparo Ortega-Yago, Mariano Barrés-Carsí, Antonio Balfagón-Ferrer","doi":"10.1016/j.recot.2024.11.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction The association of ipsilateral tibia fractures has a low incidence, being up to 3.2% of total tibia fractures. Currently there is no gold standard regarding the ideal surgical treatment. The objective of this study is to analyze the surgical treatment and the radiographic and functional results, as well as the associated complication rate of ipsilateral bifocal tibia fractures. Material and methods Retrospective observational study in our hospital from 2010 to 2022 of 24 patients who underwent bifocal fracture of the ipsilateral tibia. Demographic and surgical data and complications during follow-up were included. Results The 24 patients were classified into group 1 when they presented a fracture of the plateau and distal tibia (25%), group 2 with a fracture of the plateau and diaphysis (33%) and group 3 with a fracture of the diaphysis and distal tibia (42%). 3 patients underwent surgery with 1 implant and 21 patients with 2 implants. The average follow-up time in outpatient clinics was 2 and a half years. At one year, 22 patients (92%) had full weight bearing and 2 patients had partial weight bearing (8%) due to the sequelae of the fractures. The average time for consolidation of the diaphysis was 7.75 ± 2 months, with no significant differences observed between group 2 and group 3 (p = 0.06). The average time for consolidation of the metaphysis was 3.50 ± 1.5 months, with no significant differences observed between group 1 and group 2 (p = 0.065). 7 patients (30%) had complications during follow-up. Conclusions Bifocal tibia fractures can be treated using a combination of intramedullary nailing and plate osteosynthesis with good long-term results, obtaining an optimal union rate and low complications. In addition, it facilitates the reduction of the fracture, thus facilitating the patient's recovery and obtaining good long-term functional results.</p>","PeriodicalId":39664,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2024.11.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction The association of ipsilateral tibia fractures has a low incidence, being up to 3.2% of total tibia fractures. Currently there is no gold standard regarding the ideal surgical treatment. The objective of this study is to analyze the surgical treatment and the radiographic and functional results, as well as the associated complication rate of ipsilateral bifocal tibia fractures. Material and methods Retrospective observational study in our hospital from 2010 to 2022 of 24 patients who underwent bifocal fracture of the ipsilateral tibia. Demographic and surgical data and complications during follow-up were included. Results The 24 patients were classified into group 1 when they presented a fracture of the plateau and distal tibia (25%), group 2 with a fracture of the plateau and diaphysis (33%) and group 3 with a fracture of the diaphysis and distal tibia (42%). 3 patients underwent surgery with 1 implant and 21 patients with 2 implants. The average follow-up time in outpatient clinics was 2 and a half years. At one year, 22 patients (92%) had full weight bearing and 2 patients had partial weight bearing (8%) due to the sequelae of the fractures. The average time for consolidation of the diaphysis was 7.75 ± 2 months, with no significant differences observed between group 2 and group 3 (p = 0.06). The average time for consolidation of the metaphysis was 3.50 ± 1.5 months, with no significant differences observed between group 1 and group 2 (p = 0.065). 7 patients (30%) had complications during follow-up. Conclusions Bifocal tibia fractures can be treated using a combination of intramedullary nailing and plate osteosynthesis with good long-term results, obtaining an optimal union rate and low complications. In addition, it facilitates the reduction of the fracture, thus facilitating the patient's recovery and obtaining good long-term functional results.

[译文]同侧双侧胫骨骨折的手术治疗:外科医生面临的挑战。
引言 同侧胫骨骨折的发生率很低,仅占胫骨骨折总数的 3.2%。目前,理想的手术治疗方法尚无金标准。本研究旨在分析同侧双胫骨骨折的手术治疗、影像学和功能结果,以及相关并发症的发生率。材料与方法 2010年至2022年在我院对24例同侧胫骨双髁骨折患者进行的回顾性观察研究。研究内容包括人口统计学、手术数据和随访期间的并发症。结果 24例患者被分为第一组,即高原和胫骨远端骨折(25%);第二组,即高原和干骺端骨折(33%);第三组,即干骺端和胫骨远端骨折(42%)。3 名患者接受了植入 1 个假体的手术,21 名患者接受了植入 2 个假体的手术。门诊随访时间平均为两年半。一年后,22 名患者(92%)可以完全负重,2 名患者(8%)因骨折后遗症只能部分负重。骨骺的平均巩固时间为 7.75±2 个月,第 2 组和第 3 组之间无明显差异(P = 0.06)。骨骺的平均巩固时间为 3.50 ± 1.5 个月,第一组和第二组之间无明显差异(p = 0.065)。7 名患者(30%)在随访期间出现并发症。结论 采用髓内钉和钢板骨合成术联合治疗双侧胫骨骨折可取得良好的长期效果,获得最佳的愈合率和较低的并发症。此外,髓内钉还有助于缩小骨折,从而促进患者的康复,并获得良好的长期功能效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
156
审稿时长
51 weeks
期刊介绍: Es una magnífica revista para acceder a los mejores artículos de investigación en la especialidad y los casos clínicos de mayor interés. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad, y está incluida en prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信