The centrality of nursing in realizing high quality palliative care: Exploring Canada's framework on palliative care priorities.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Barbara Pesut, Sally Thorne, David Kenneth Wright, Michael Banwell
{"title":"The centrality of nursing in realizing high quality palliative care: Exploring Canada's framework on palliative care priorities.","authors":"Barbara Pesut, Sally Thorne, David Kenneth Wright, Michael Banwell","doi":"10.1186/s12912-024-02488-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following an earlier mixed-method survey in which we asked stakeholders to report on their perceptions of the progress made in relation to Canada's Framework on Palliative Care and Action Plan, the purpose of this study was to conduct an in-depth qualitative exploration of the factors influencing that progress, or lack thereof.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a qualitative interview study conducted in Canada. Inclusion criteria included experience with palliative care in Canada in a professional or volunteer capacity. Interviews were conducted by telephone using an interview guide that asked specific questions in relation to the Framework on palliative care priorities (e.g., education, caregiver support, and equitable access). Data was analyzed using qualitative descriptive methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five diverse stakeholders with extensive experience in palliative care were interviewed. In relation to palliative education, participants indicated that although there were excellent palliative care resources available across the country there was further need for embedding palliative care in undergraduate education and for mentored opportunities to engage in care across diverse contexts. The identification, development, and strategic positioning of champions was an important strategy for improving palliative care knowledge and capacity. The development of standard competencies was viewed as an important step forward; although, there was a need to include more members of the care-team and to create pathways for life-long learning. In relation to support for family caregivers, even as participants cited numerous community-based resources offered by not-for-profit organizations, they described significant barriers including a shortage of in-home support, lack of understanding of what caregivers do, and policy-based contractual and privacy issues. In relation to palliative care access, participants described a nurse-centered, consult-based, multi-site and multi-provider model of care that was facilitated by technology. Barriers to this model were systemic healthcare issues of siloed, fragmented, and for-profit care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants in this study had clear insights into the factors that would support or impede progress to the development of palliative care in Canada. Some of those factors were achievable within current health and educational systems. Other factors were going to require longer term and more comprehensive solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"23 1","pages":"814"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02488-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Following an earlier mixed-method survey in which we asked stakeholders to report on their perceptions of the progress made in relation to Canada's Framework on Palliative Care and Action Plan, the purpose of this study was to conduct an in-depth qualitative exploration of the factors influencing that progress, or lack thereof.

Methods: This was a qualitative interview study conducted in Canada. Inclusion criteria included experience with palliative care in Canada in a professional or volunteer capacity. Interviews were conducted by telephone using an interview guide that asked specific questions in relation to the Framework on palliative care priorities (e.g., education, caregiver support, and equitable access). Data was analyzed using qualitative descriptive methods.

Results: Thirty-five diverse stakeholders with extensive experience in palliative care were interviewed. In relation to palliative education, participants indicated that although there were excellent palliative care resources available across the country there was further need for embedding palliative care in undergraduate education and for mentored opportunities to engage in care across diverse contexts. The identification, development, and strategic positioning of champions was an important strategy for improving palliative care knowledge and capacity. The development of standard competencies was viewed as an important step forward; although, there was a need to include more members of the care-team and to create pathways for life-long learning. In relation to support for family caregivers, even as participants cited numerous community-based resources offered by not-for-profit organizations, they described significant barriers including a shortage of in-home support, lack of understanding of what caregivers do, and policy-based contractual and privacy issues. In relation to palliative care access, participants described a nurse-centered, consult-based, multi-site and multi-provider model of care that was facilitated by technology. Barriers to this model were systemic healthcare issues of siloed, fragmented, and for-profit care.

Conclusion: Participants in this study had clear insights into the factors that would support or impede progress to the development of palliative care in Canada. Some of those factors were achievable within current health and educational systems. Other factors were going to require longer term and more comprehensive solutions.

护理在实现高质量姑息关怀中的核心作用:探索加拿大姑息关怀优先事项框架。
背景:在早前的一项混合方法调查中,我们要求利益相关者报告他们对加拿大姑息关怀框架和行动计划所取得进展的看法,本研究的目的是对影响进展或缺乏进展的因素进行深入的定性探索:这是一项在加拿大进行的定性访谈研究。纳入标准包括在加拿大从事姑息关怀工作的专业人士或志愿者。访谈是通过电话进行的,采用的访谈指南提出了与姑息关怀优先事项框架(如教育、照护者支持和公平获取)相关的具体问题。采用定性描述方法对数据进行了分析:对 35 位在姑息关怀方面具有丰富经验的不同利益相关者进行了访谈。在姑息关怀教育方面,参与者表示,虽然全国各地都有很好的姑息关怀资源,但还需要进一步将姑息关怀纳入本科教育,并提供在不同背景下参与姑息关怀的指导机会。标兵的确定、培养和战略定位是提高姑息关怀知识和能力的重要战略。制定标准能力被视为向前迈出的重要一步;尽管如此,仍有必要将更多的关怀团队成员纳入其中,并为终身学习创造途径。关于对家庭照护者的支持,尽管与会者列举了许多非营利组织提供的社区资源,但他们也描述了一些重大障碍,包括居家支持短缺、对照护者的工作缺乏了解,以及基于政策的合同和隐私问题。在姑息关怀的获取方面,与会者描述了一种以护士为中心、以咨询为基础、多地点和多提供者的关怀模式,该模式在技术的推动下得以实现。这种模式的障碍是系统性的医疗保健问题,即孤立、分散和营利性医疗保健:本研究的参与者对支持或阻碍加拿大姑息关怀发展的因素有清晰的认识。其中一些因素在当前的医疗和教育体系中是可以实现的。其他因素则需要更长期、更全面的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信