CONNECT: Coordinating Options for Neurovascular Patients Needing Electrophysiology Consults and Treatments.

IF 0.9 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Melissa Mortin, Ben Shifflett, Dawn M Meyer, Lovella Hailey, Stephanie Yoakum, Jonathan C Hsu, Brett C Meyer
{"title":"CONNECT: Coordinating Options for Neurovascular Patients Needing Electrophysiology Consults and Treatments.","authors":"Melissa Mortin, Ben Shifflett, Dawn M Meyer, Lovella Hailey, Stephanie Yoakum, Jonathan C Hsu, Brett C Meyer","doi":"10.1177/19418744241289973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Though Event Monitors (EM) and Implantable Loop Recorders (ILR) are prevalent in stroke workups, complex processes to obtain placement of these device might result in delays. Our aim was to determine if the CONNECT (Coordinating Options for Neurovascular patients Needing Electrophysiology Consults and Treatments) pathway could improve Stroke-to-Electrophysiology (EP) communications, increase EM and ILR device placements prior to discharge, shorten placement time, and preserve satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed device placements when an EP consult was obtained [Pre-CONNECT (5/1/21-4/30/22), CONNECT (5/1/22-4/30/23)] for patients with stroke. In the Pre- period, consults were sent via EPIC electronic medical record (EMR), with additional direct communication when desired. In the CONNECT period, the pathway and module allowed for immediate communication between services. Outcomes included case rate, times, length of stay, and satisfaction. Hospital reports detailed Order to Activation (O-A) days. EM report review was used to obtain O-A time. Clinician satisfaction was assessed using Qualtrics survey. Patient satisfaction was assessed with Hospital Consumer Assessment of Health care Clinicians and Systems (HCAHPS) survey. Man-Whitney U test was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>78 patients were included (30EM(38.5%), 48ILR(61.5%)). Age was 68 years (<i>P</i> = 0.58). For ILRs, inpatient placements prior to discharge increased (3Pre vs 51 CONNECT; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) as did outpatient placements (5 vs 16; <i>P</i> = 0.02). Order to Activation (O-A) time savings were significant for ILR overall (32 days vs 1 day; <i>P</i> = 0.03) and for Inpatient EM (13 days vs 3 days; <i>P</i> = 0.003). Time for consultant to view was 4 min and to respond was 6 min. Devices were placed at a median 6 hrs 32 min (EM: 4 hrs 19 min; ILR:7 hrs36 min). All (12/12) clinicians preferred the technique. Patient satisfaction improved on 13/19 (68%) questions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a 1600% increase in ILR placements prior to discharge that was associated with the time period that the CONNECT process was in place. The robust improvement in ILR placements prior to discharge, high satisfaction, ease of use, closed loop communication, and respect for autonomy allowing more organic parallel discussions with patients improved clinician workflow which could potentially improve future risk reduction strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":46355,"journal":{"name":"Neurohospitalist","volume":" ","pages":"19418744241289973"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559453/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurohospitalist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19418744241289973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Though Event Monitors (EM) and Implantable Loop Recorders (ILR) are prevalent in stroke workups, complex processes to obtain placement of these device might result in delays. Our aim was to determine if the CONNECT (Coordinating Options for Neurovascular patients Needing Electrophysiology Consults and Treatments) pathway could improve Stroke-to-Electrophysiology (EP) communications, increase EM and ILR device placements prior to discharge, shorten placement time, and preserve satisfaction.

Methods: We assessed device placements when an EP consult was obtained [Pre-CONNECT (5/1/21-4/30/22), CONNECT (5/1/22-4/30/23)] for patients with stroke. In the Pre- period, consults were sent via EPIC electronic medical record (EMR), with additional direct communication when desired. In the CONNECT period, the pathway and module allowed for immediate communication between services. Outcomes included case rate, times, length of stay, and satisfaction. Hospital reports detailed Order to Activation (O-A) days. EM report review was used to obtain O-A time. Clinician satisfaction was assessed using Qualtrics survey. Patient satisfaction was assessed with Hospital Consumer Assessment of Health care Clinicians and Systems (HCAHPS) survey. Man-Whitney U test was used.

Results: 78 patients were included (30EM(38.5%), 48ILR(61.5%)). Age was 68 years (P = 0.58). For ILRs, inpatient placements prior to discharge increased (3Pre vs 51 CONNECT; P < 0.0001) as did outpatient placements (5 vs 16; P = 0.02). Order to Activation (O-A) time savings were significant for ILR overall (32 days vs 1 day; P = 0.03) and for Inpatient EM (13 days vs 3 days; P = 0.003). Time for consultant to view was 4 min and to respond was 6 min. Devices were placed at a median 6 hrs 32 min (EM: 4 hrs 19 min; ILR:7 hrs36 min). All (12/12) clinicians preferred the technique. Patient satisfaction improved on 13/19 (68%) questions.

Conclusions: There was a 1600% increase in ILR placements prior to discharge that was associated with the time period that the CONNECT process was in place. The robust improvement in ILR placements prior to discharge, high satisfaction, ease of use, closed loop communication, and respect for autonomy allowing more organic parallel discussions with patients improved clinician workflow which could potentially improve future risk reduction strategies.

CONNECT:协调需要电生理学咨询和治疗的神经血管患者的选择。
背景和目的:虽然事件监测仪(EM)和植入式环路记录仪(ILR)在卒中治疗中很普遍,但安置这些设备的复杂过程可能会导致延误。我们的目的是确定 CONNECT(需要电生理学会诊和治疗的神经血管患者的协调选择)途径是否能改善卒中与电生理学(EP)之间的沟通,增加出院前 EM 和 ILR 装置的安置,缩短安置时间并保持满意度:方法: 我们评估了脑卒中患者在接受 EP 会诊[Pre-CONNECT (5/1/21-4/30/22)、CONNECT (5/1/22-4/30/23)]时的装置安置情况。在 "CONNECT 前 "阶段,咨询通过 EPIC 电子病历 (EMR) 发送,并在需要时进行额外的直接沟通。在 CONNECT 阶段,路径和模块允许服务部门之间进行即时沟通。结果包括病例率、时间、住院时间和满意度。医院报告详细列出了从下单到激活(O-A)的天数。EM 报告审查用于获取 O-A 时间。临床医生满意度通过 Qualtrics 调查进行评估。患者满意度通过 "医院消费者医疗保健临床医生和系统评估"(HCAHPS)调查进行评估。采用 Man-Whitney U 检验:共纳入 78 名患者(30EM(38.5%),48ILR(61.5%))。年龄为 68 岁(P = 0.58)。就 ILR 而言,出院前的住院治疗增加了(3Pre vs 51 CONNECT;P < 0.0001),门诊治疗也增加了(5 vs 16;P = 0.02)。对于 ILR 整体(32 天 vs 1 天;P = 0.03)和 EM 住院患者(13 天 vs 3 天;P = 0.003)而言,从下单到启动(O-A)所需时间的节省非常显著。顾问查看时间为 4 分钟,回复时间为 6 分钟。放置设备的时间中位数为 6 小时 32 分钟(EM:4 小时 19 分钟;ILR:7 小时 36 分钟)。所有临床医生(12/12)都喜欢这种技术。患者对13/19(68%)个问题的满意度有所提高:出院前ILR置管增加了1600%,这与CONNECT流程实施的时间段有关。出院前ILR置入率的显著提高、高满意度、易用性、闭环沟通以及尊重患者自主权使得与患者进行更有机的平行讨论改善了临床医生的工作流程,从而有可能改善未来的风险降低策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurohospitalist
Neurohospitalist CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信