Clinical Acceptability of a Quality Improvement Program for Reducing Cardiovascular Disease Risk in People With Chronic Kidney Disease in Australian General Practice: Qualitative Study.

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR Human Factors Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.2196/55667
Caroline McBride, Barbara Hunter, Natalie Lumsden, Kaleswari Somasundaram, Rita McMorrow, Douglas Boyle, Jon Emery, Craig Nelson, Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis
{"title":"Clinical Acceptability of a Quality Improvement Program for Reducing Cardiovascular Disease Risk in People With Chronic Kidney Disease in Australian General Practice: Qualitative Study.","authors":"Caroline McBride, Barbara Hunter, Natalie Lumsden, Kaleswari Somasundaram, Rita McMorrow, Douglas Boyle, Jon Emery, Craig Nelson, Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis","doi":"10.2196/55667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Future Health Today (FHT) is a technology program that integrates with general practice clinical software to provide point of care (PoC) clinical decision support and a quality improvement dashboard. This qualitative study looks at the use of FHT in the context of cardiovascular disease risk in chronic kidney disease (CKD).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore factors influencing clinical implementation of the FHT module focusing on cardiovascular risk in CKD, from the perspectives of participating general practitioner staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Practices in Victoria were recruited to participate in a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial using FHT, of which 19 practices were randomly assigned to use FHT's cardiovascular risk in CKD program. A total of 13 semistructured interviews were undertaken with a nominated general practitioner (n=7) or practice nurse (n=6) from 10 participating practices. Interview questions focused on the clinical usefulness of the tool and its place in clinical workflows. Qualitative data were coded by 2 researchers and analyzed using framework analysis and Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 13 interviewees had used the FHT PoC tool, and feedback was largely positive. Overall, clinicians described engaging with the tool as a \"prompt\" or \"reminder\" system. Themes reflected that the tool's goals and clinical content were aligned with clinician's existing priorities and knowledge, and the tool's design facilitated easy integration into existing workflows. The main barrier to implementation identified by 2 clinicians was notification fatigue. A total of 7 interviewees had used the FHT dashboard tool. The main barriers to use were its limited integration into clinical workflows, such that some participants did not know of its existence; clinicians' competing clinical priorities; and limited time to learn and use the tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified many facilitators for the successful use of the FHT PoC program, in the context of cardiovascular risk in CKD, and barriers to the use of the dashboard program. This work will be used to inform the wider implementation of FHT, as well as the development of future modules of FHT for other risk or disease states.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e55667"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/55667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Future Health Today (FHT) is a technology program that integrates with general practice clinical software to provide point of care (PoC) clinical decision support and a quality improvement dashboard. This qualitative study looks at the use of FHT in the context of cardiovascular disease risk in chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Objective: This study aims to explore factors influencing clinical implementation of the FHT module focusing on cardiovascular risk in CKD, from the perspectives of participating general practitioner staff.

Methods: Practices in Victoria were recruited to participate in a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial using FHT, of which 19 practices were randomly assigned to use FHT's cardiovascular risk in CKD program. A total of 13 semistructured interviews were undertaken with a nominated general practitioner (n=7) or practice nurse (n=6) from 10 participating practices. Interview questions focused on the clinical usefulness of the tool and its place in clinical workflows. Qualitative data were coded by 2 researchers and analyzed using framework analysis and Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory.

Results: All 13 interviewees had used the FHT PoC tool, and feedback was largely positive. Overall, clinicians described engaging with the tool as a "prompt" or "reminder" system. Themes reflected that the tool's goals and clinical content were aligned with clinician's existing priorities and knowledge, and the tool's design facilitated easy integration into existing workflows. The main barrier to implementation identified by 2 clinicians was notification fatigue. A total of 7 interviewees had used the FHT dashboard tool. The main barriers to use were its limited integration into clinical workflows, such that some participants did not know of its existence; clinicians' competing clinical priorities; and limited time to learn and use the tool.

Conclusions: This study identified many facilitators for the successful use of the FHT PoC program, in the context of cardiovascular risk in CKD, and barriers to the use of the dashboard program. This work will be used to inform the wider implementation of FHT, as well as the development of future modules of FHT for other risk or disease states.

澳大利亚全科医生降低慢性肾病患者心血管疾病风险的质量改进计划的临床可接受性:定性研究。
背景:未来健康今天(FHT)是一项技术计划,它与全科临床软件相结合,提供护理点(PoC)临床决策支持和质量改进仪表板。本定性研究探讨了在慢性肾脏病(CKD)心血管疾病风险的背景下使用 FHT 的情况:本研究旨在从参与研究的全科医生的角度探讨影响临床实施 FHT 模块的因素,该模块重点关注 CKD 中的心血管疾病风险:维多利亚州的医疗机构被招募参加使用FHT的实用分组随机对照试验,其中19家医疗机构被随机分配使用FHT的CKD心血管风险项目。对 10 家参与试验的诊所的指定全科医生(7 人)或执业护士(6 人)进行了 13 次半结构式访谈。访谈问题主要集中在该工具的临床实用性及其在临床工作流程中的地位。定性数据由两名研究人员进行编码,并采用框架分析和临床表现反馈干预理论进行分析:所有 13 位受访者都使用过 FHT PoC 工具,反馈大多是积极的。总体而言,临床医生将该工具描述为一个 "提示 "或 "提醒 "系统。主题反映出该工具的目标和临床内容与临床医生现有的优先事项和知识相一致,而且该工具的设计便于与现有的工作流程整合。2 名临床医生指出,实施的主要障碍是通知疲劳。共有 7 名受访者使用过家庭健康状况跟踪仪表板工具。使用该工具的主要障碍是其与临床工作流程的整合程度有限,以至于一些受访者不知道该工具的存在;临床医生的临床优先事项相互竞争;以及学习和使用该工具的时间有限:本研究发现了在 CKD 患者心血管风险的背景下成功使用 FHT PoC 程序的许多促进因素,以及使用仪表板程序的障碍。这项工作将为更广泛地实施 FHT 以及未来针对其他风险或疾病状态开发 FHT 模块提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Human Factors
JMIR Human Factors Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
123
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信