Ethical Concerns Regarding the Timing of Written Consent.

Abstract

AbstractObjective: Thorough informed consent requires decision-making capacity, adequate information, lack of coercion, and an appropriate environment. Consent obtained in the preoperative area is hurried, limiting the quality of informed consent and the opportunity for patient reflection, characteristics inconsistent with patient-centered practice. The incidence of obtaining consent immediately prior to surgery is unknown.

Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing surgery at a single center between 1 June 2021 and 14 June 2021 were identified. Time between consent signature and operating room arrival time was measured. Three surgeons reviewed cases and categorized them as major or not major operations.

Results: 78.7 percent (199/253) of patients arriving to the preoperative area the day of surgery signed written consent that day. 99.6 percent (248/249) of anesthesia consents were signed the day of surgery. Spanish as a primary language corelated significantly with consent signing on the day of surgery (p = .04). Race and distance traveled for surgery were not significantly associated with consent signing in the preoperative area. 79.3 percent (157/198) had consent signed within 90 minutes of arrival to the operating room. Among major outpatient cases, 77.8 percent (182/234) had consent signing in the preoperative area.

Conclusions: This demonstrates routine consent signing in the hurried preoperative setting, suggesting a potential source for improved informed consent. Additionally, language-based consenting disparities, specifically in Spanish, offer opportunity for improvement. The majority of consents were signed the day of surgery, in the preoperative area, and within 90 minutes prior to operating room start time. This offers an opportunity for improved patient-centered care.