The In-Hospital Code Stroke: A Look Back and the Road Ahead.

IF 0.9 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Andrea M Kuczynski, W David Freeman, Lesia H Mooney, Josephine F Huang, Andrew M Demchuk, Houman Khosravani
{"title":"The In-Hospital Code Stroke: A Look Back and the Road Ahead.","authors":"Andrea M Kuczynski, W David Freeman, Lesia H Mooney, Josephine F Huang, Andrew M Demchuk, Houman Khosravani","doi":"10.1177/19418744241298035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With increased patient volumes and complexity, stroke occurrence in hospitalized patients has become relatively more common. The process of activating a code stroke in-hospital differs in many institutions. An emergency team-based response to inpatient acute code stroke is warranted, with many protocols modeled similarly to the cardiac arrest response. However, several studies have demonstrated delays in recognition and management of acute stroke in-hospital as compared to those arriving directly to the emergency department (ED). Furthermore, there are several shared challenges with code stroke resuscitation in the emergency department and the ward, which include the assembly of ad hoc teams and requirement of access to urgent imaging. Delays in activating in-hospital code stroke contributes to increased morbidity, mortality, prolonged hospitalization, and associated health care costs. In the following commentary, we discuss the current landscape of acute in-hospital code stroke protocols, review the differences in neurologic outcomes between inpatient vs ED/out-of-hospital code stroke patients, and propose future directions for in-hospital code stroke paradigms for improved patient outcomes and quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":46355,"journal":{"name":"Neurohospitalist","volume":" ","pages":"19418744241298035"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559452/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurohospitalist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19418744241298035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With increased patient volumes and complexity, stroke occurrence in hospitalized patients has become relatively more common. The process of activating a code stroke in-hospital differs in many institutions. An emergency team-based response to inpatient acute code stroke is warranted, with many protocols modeled similarly to the cardiac arrest response. However, several studies have demonstrated delays in recognition and management of acute stroke in-hospital as compared to those arriving directly to the emergency department (ED). Furthermore, there are several shared challenges with code stroke resuscitation in the emergency department and the ward, which include the assembly of ad hoc teams and requirement of access to urgent imaging. Delays in activating in-hospital code stroke contributes to increased morbidity, mortality, prolonged hospitalization, and associated health care costs. In the following commentary, we discuss the current landscape of acute in-hospital code stroke protocols, review the differences in neurologic outcomes between inpatient vs ED/out-of-hospital code stroke patients, and propose future directions for in-hospital code stroke paradigms for improved patient outcomes and quality of care.

院内代码中风:回顾过去,展望未来。
随着病人数量和复杂性的增加,住院病人发生卒中的情况也变得越来越普遍。许多机构启动院内卒中代码的流程各不相同。对于住院病人急性卒中,应以急诊团队为基础进行响应,许多规程与心脏骤停响应类似。然而,多项研究表明,与直接到达急诊科(ED)的急性卒中患者相比,院内急性卒中的识别和处理存在延迟。此外,在急诊科和病房进行卒中抢救有几个共同的挑战,包括组建临时团队和要求获得紧急成像。延迟启动院内卒中代码会增加发病率、死亡率、住院时间及相关医疗费用。在下面的评论中,我们将讨论急性院内卒中规范的现状,回顾住院患者与急诊室/院外卒中患者在神经功能预后方面的差异,并提出院内卒中规范的未来发展方向,以改善患者预后,提高医疗质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurohospitalist
Neurohospitalist CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信