Addiction is a Dignity Disorder.

IF 0.4 Q4 MEDICAL ETHICS
Matthew Robert Dernbach
{"title":"Addiction is a Dignity Disorder.","authors":"Matthew Robert Dernbach","doi":"10.1177/00243639241290849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human dignity refers to the value of the human person. By clarifying distinctions within human dignity, we can conclude that, whereas a person's ontological dignity cannot be lost or diminished regardless of circumstance, a person's existential, moral, or social dignity can be impaired. We describe the state of impaired existential, moral, or social dignity as a dignity disorder, which is defined by the criteria of: impaired rationality; impaired will; impaired capacity to love; and impaired body. We further demonstrate how addiction can be characterized as a dignity disorder with the associated benefit of emphasizing a personalist approach to addiction treatment with the principal intent of promoting existential, moral, and social dignity, which entails: restoring agency, self-efficacy, and freedom of choice; reconciling the internal conflict of <i>akrasia</i>; restoring loving, disinterested relationships; and healing the dysfunctional neuroadaptations and medical sequelae of substance use. This nosology reveals that the distinction between addiction as a choice and addiction as a disease is a false dichotomy; rather, addiction represents an impairment in both body and spirit. By incorporating the criteria of love, this nosology also reveals that addiction is an issue of both personal and societal responsibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":44238,"journal":{"name":"Linacre Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":"00243639241290849"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559534/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linacre Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00243639241290849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human dignity refers to the value of the human person. By clarifying distinctions within human dignity, we can conclude that, whereas a person's ontological dignity cannot be lost or diminished regardless of circumstance, a person's existential, moral, or social dignity can be impaired. We describe the state of impaired existential, moral, or social dignity as a dignity disorder, which is defined by the criteria of: impaired rationality; impaired will; impaired capacity to love; and impaired body. We further demonstrate how addiction can be characterized as a dignity disorder with the associated benefit of emphasizing a personalist approach to addiction treatment with the principal intent of promoting existential, moral, and social dignity, which entails: restoring agency, self-efficacy, and freedom of choice; reconciling the internal conflict of akrasia; restoring loving, disinterested relationships; and healing the dysfunctional neuroadaptations and medical sequelae of substance use. This nosology reveals that the distinction between addiction as a choice and addiction as a disease is a false dichotomy; rather, addiction represents an impairment in both body and spirit. By incorporating the criteria of love, this nosology also reveals that addiction is an issue of both personal and societal responsibility.

成瘾是一种尊严障碍。
人的尊严是指人的价值。通过厘清人的尊严内部的区别,我们可以得出这样的结论:一个人的本体尊严无论在什么情况下都不会丧失或减损,但一个人的存在尊严、道德尊严或社会尊严却可能受损。我们将生存、道德或社会尊严受损的状态描述为尊严障碍,其标准是:理性受损;意志受损;爱的能力受损;身体受损。我们进一步说明了如何将成瘾定性为尊严障碍,其相关的益处是强调以促进存在、道德和社会尊严为主要目的的个人主义成瘾治疗方法,这需要:恢复代理、自我效能和选择自由;调和 "阿克拉西亚"(akrasia)的内部冲突;恢复爱的、无私的人际关系;以及治愈功能失调的神经适应和药物使用的医学后遗症。这种命名法揭示了成瘾是一种选择和成瘾是一种疾病之间的区别是一种错误的二分法;相反,成瘾代表了身体和精神的双重损伤。通过纳入 "爱 "的标准,该命名法还揭示了成瘾既是个人责任问题,也是社会责任问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Linacre Quarterly
Linacre Quarterly MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
40.00%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信