Adherence to periprocedural antithrombotic treatment recommendations and its prognostic impact in patients with high ischemic and hemorrhagic risk.

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
María Anguita-Gámez, David Vivas, Raquel Ferrandis, María Asunción Esteve-Pastor, Rafael González-Manzanares, Marysol Echeverri, Jesús Igualada, Isabel Egocheaga, Beatriz Nozal-Mateo, Ane Abad-Motos, Elena Figuero, Nuria Bouzó-Molina, Teresa Lozano, Carlos Álvarez-Ortega, Javier Torres, María José Descalzo, Juan Carlos Catalá, Enrique Martín-Rioboo, Alejandra Moliner, Rocío Rodríguez-Contreras, Manuel Carnero-Alcázar, Francisco Marín, Manuel Anguita
{"title":"Adherence to periprocedural antithrombotic treatment recommendations and its prognostic impact in patients with high ischemic and hemorrhagic risk.","authors":"María Anguita-Gámez, David Vivas, Raquel Ferrandis, María Asunción Esteve-Pastor, Rafael González-Manzanares, Marysol Echeverri, Jesús Igualada, Isabel Egocheaga, Beatriz Nozal-Mateo, Ane Abad-Motos, Elena Figuero, Nuria Bouzó-Molina, Teresa Lozano, Carlos Álvarez-Ortega, Javier Torres, María José Descalzo, Juan Carlos Catalá, Enrique Martín-Rioboo, Alejandra Moliner, Rocío Rodríguez-Contreras, Manuel Carnero-Alcázar, Francisco Marín, Manuel Anguita","doi":"10.1016/j.rec.2024.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>To analyze the clinical impact of the inappropriate use of antithrombotic treatment in patients with high ischemic or hemorrhagic risk during the periprocedural/perisurgical period in Spain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective multicenter observational registry of patients receiving antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy who required an intervention. The incidence of 30-day events was compared based on the peri-intervention management of antithrombotic treatment and the patients' risk classification (high vs. moderate-to-low risk). The primary endpoint was a composite of death, cardiovascular ischemic events, or bleeding events classified as BARC 2 or higher.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1152 patients were analyzed. Of these, 1.9% had both high ischemic and hemorrhagic risks (A);10.8% had high ischemic risk and low-to-moderate hemorrhagic risk (B); 12% had high hemorrhagic risk and low-to-moderate ischemic risk (C); and 75.3% had both low-to-moderate risks (D). The prevalence of inappropriate treatment was higher in the subgroup with high hemorrhagic risk and low-to-moderate ischemic risk (C) (62.6% vs 40.9% in subgroup A; P < .05; 40.3% in subgroup B; P < .001; and 39.8% in subgroup D; P < .05). The incidence of the composite endpoint was higher in the subgroups with high ischemic and hemorrhagic risks (22.7%) and high ischemic and low-to-moderate hemorrhagic risks (20.9%), compared with 3.6% in subgroup C (P < .05) and 5.7% in subgroup D (P < .001). Among patients with inappropriate treatment, the incidence of the composite endpoint was significantly higher in subgroups with high ischemic and hemorrhagic risks (44.4% vs 7.7%; P = .043) and high ischemic and low-to-moderate hemorrhagic risks (30% vs 14.8%; P = .042).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of inappropriate periprocedural/perisurgical treatment was higher in patients with high hemorrhagic risk and low-to-moderate ischemic risk. The incidence of events was higher in patients with high ischemic risk, with inadequate antithrombotic management being associated with a higher event rate in these groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":38430,"journal":{"name":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2024.09.010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: To analyze the clinical impact of the inappropriate use of antithrombotic treatment in patients with high ischemic or hemorrhagic risk during the periprocedural/perisurgical period in Spain.

Methods: Prospective multicenter observational registry of patients receiving antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy who required an intervention. The incidence of 30-day events was compared based on the peri-intervention management of antithrombotic treatment and the patients' risk classification (high vs. moderate-to-low risk). The primary endpoint was a composite of death, cardiovascular ischemic events, or bleeding events classified as BARC 2 or higher.

Results: A total of 1152 patients were analyzed. Of these, 1.9% had both high ischemic and hemorrhagic risks (A);10.8% had high ischemic risk and low-to-moderate hemorrhagic risk (B); 12% had high hemorrhagic risk and low-to-moderate ischemic risk (C); and 75.3% had both low-to-moderate risks (D). The prevalence of inappropriate treatment was higher in the subgroup with high hemorrhagic risk and low-to-moderate ischemic risk (C) (62.6% vs 40.9% in subgroup A; P < .05; 40.3% in subgroup B; P < .001; and 39.8% in subgroup D; P < .05). The incidence of the composite endpoint was higher in the subgroups with high ischemic and hemorrhagic risks (22.7%) and high ischemic and low-to-moderate hemorrhagic risks (20.9%), compared with 3.6% in subgroup C (P < .05) and 5.7% in subgroup D (P < .001). Among patients with inappropriate treatment, the incidence of the composite endpoint was significantly higher in subgroups with high ischemic and hemorrhagic risks (44.4% vs 7.7%; P = .043) and high ischemic and low-to-moderate hemorrhagic risks (30% vs 14.8%; P = .042).

Conclusions: The prevalence of inappropriate periprocedural/perisurgical treatment was higher in patients with high hemorrhagic risk and low-to-moderate ischemic risk. The incidence of events was higher in patients with high ischemic risk, with inadequate antithrombotic management being associated with a higher event rate in these groups.

高缺血和出血风险患者坚持围手术期抗血栓治疗建议及其对预后的影响。
导言和目标:分析西班牙在围手术期/手术前期间对缺血或出血风险较高的患者不当使用抗血栓治疗的临床影响:方法:对接受抗血小板和/或抗凝治疗并需要进行介入治疗的患者进行前瞻性多中心观察登记。根据干预期间的抗血栓治疗管理和患者的风险分类(高风险与中低风险),比较了 30 天事件的发生率。主要终点是死亡、心血管缺血事件或出血事件(BARC 2 级或以上)的综合结果:共对 1152 名患者进行了分析。其中,1.9%的患者同时具有高缺血和高出血风险(A);10.8%的患者具有高缺血风险和中低出血风险(B);12%的患者具有高出血风险和中低缺血风险(C);75.3%的患者同时具有中低风险(D)。在出血风险高和中低缺血风险(C)的亚组中,不恰当治疗的发生率更高(62.6% 对 A 亚组的 40.9%;P 结论:出血风险高和中低缺血风险患者的围手术期/围手术期治疗不当发生率较高。高缺血风险患者的事件发生率更高,在这些组别中,抗血栓治疗不当与较高的事件发生率有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
219
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信