Religiosity, perceived family support, and gender disclosure of LGBTQ + medical students in Thailand.

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Pakawat Wiwattanaworaset, Papan Vadhanavikkit, Sorawit Wainipitapong, Maytinee Srifuengfung, Awirut Oon-Arom, Mayteewat Chiddaycha, Teeravut Wiwattarangkul
{"title":"Religiosity, perceived family support, and gender disclosure of LGBTQ + medical students in Thailand.","authors":"Pakawat Wiwattanaworaset, Papan Vadhanavikkit, Sorawit Wainipitapong, Maytinee Srifuengfung, Awirut Oon-Arom, Mayteewat Chiddaycha, Teeravut Wiwattarangkul","doi":"10.1186/s40359-024-02170-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The well-being of LGBTQ + medical students can be influenced by religiosity, family support, and the disclosure of their gender identity or sexual orientation. These factors have frequently been overlooked and warrant further consideration in creating a supportive environment for all students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter study investigated two main outcomes including the differences in religiosity and perceived family support between LGBTQ + and non-LGBTQ + medical students in Thailand, and the gender disclosure to family among LGBTQ + medical students. It was conducted among students from five medical schools across Thailand, using online questionnaires during the academic year 2021-2022. Data were collected on demographic characteristics, religiosity, gender identity/sexual orientation disclosure to family, and perceived family support. Comparisons between groups were conducted using chi-square test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,322 participants, 31.2% identified themselves as LGBTQ+, among whom 81.8% were Buddhists. The proportion of non-religious LGBTQ + students was significantly higher (vs. non-LGBTQ+; 15.0% vs. 8.4%, respectively; p = 0.001). However, there was no statistical difference in religiosity between LGBTQ + and non-LGBTQ + students as well as between LGBTQ + subgroups. Although, 74% of LGBTQ + students reported good family support, significantly more LGBTQ + students perceived poor family support (vs. non-LGBTQ+, 7.0% vs. 4.7%; p = 0.002). Regarding the disclosure of gender identity or sexual orientation to the family, the majority of LGBTQ + individuals indicated either a non-disclosure or uncertainty. There were significant associations between perceived family support and the likelihood of disclosing one's identity to family members, as better perceived support was associated with higher disclosure rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No statistically significant difference in religiosity was found between LGBTQ + and non-LGBTQ + students. The majority of LGBTQ + medical students reported receiving good family support; however, among those who perceived their family's support to be lacking, there was a greater tendency to conceal their gender identity from their families. For future studies, it is crucial to investigate whether this concealment extends to other spheres of their lives and to assess the potential impact on their well-being, including mental health and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"12 1","pages":"653"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562599/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02170-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The well-being of LGBTQ + medical students can be influenced by religiosity, family support, and the disclosure of their gender identity or sexual orientation. These factors have frequently been overlooked and warrant further consideration in creating a supportive environment for all students.

Methods: This multicenter study investigated two main outcomes including the differences in religiosity and perceived family support between LGBTQ + and non-LGBTQ + medical students in Thailand, and the gender disclosure to family among LGBTQ + medical students. It was conducted among students from five medical schools across Thailand, using online questionnaires during the academic year 2021-2022. Data were collected on demographic characteristics, religiosity, gender identity/sexual orientation disclosure to family, and perceived family support. Comparisons between groups were conducted using chi-square test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

Results: Of the 1,322 participants, 31.2% identified themselves as LGBTQ+, among whom 81.8% were Buddhists. The proportion of non-religious LGBTQ + students was significantly higher (vs. non-LGBTQ+; 15.0% vs. 8.4%, respectively; p = 0.001). However, there was no statistical difference in religiosity between LGBTQ + and non-LGBTQ + students as well as between LGBTQ + subgroups. Although, 74% of LGBTQ + students reported good family support, significantly more LGBTQ + students perceived poor family support (vs. non-LGBTQ+, 7.0% vs. 4.7%; p = 0.002). Regarding the disclosure of gender identity or sexual orientation to the family, the majority of LGBTQ + individuals indicated either a non-disclosure or uncertainty. There were significant associations between perceived family support and the likelihood of disclosing one's identity to family members, as better perceived support was associated with higher disclosure rates.

Conclusions: No statistically significant difference in religiosity was found between LGBTQ + and non-LGBTQ + students. The majority of LGBTQ + medical students reported receiving good family support; however, among those who perceived their family's support to be lacking, there was a greater tendency to conceal their gender identity from their families. For future studies, it is crucial to investigate whether this concealment extends to other spheres of their lives and to assess the potential impact on their well-being, including mental health and quality of life.

泰国 LGBTQ + 医学生的宗教信仰、感知到的家庭支持和性别披露。
背景:LGBTQ+医学生的幸福感可能会受到宗教信仰、家庭支持以及性别认同或性取向披露的影响。这些因素经常被忽视,因此在为所有学生创造支持性环境时需要进一步考虑:这项多中心研究调查了两个主要结果,包括泰国 LGBTQ + 和非 LGBTQ + 医学生在宗教信仰和感知到的家庭支持方面的差异,以及 LGBTQ + 医学生向家庭披露性别的情况。该研究在 2021-2022 学年期间通过在线问卷对泰国五所医学院的学生进行了调查。收集的数据包括人口统计学特征、宗教信仰、向家人公开性别认同/性取向以及感知到的家庭支持。组间比较采用卡方检验(chi-square test)和Wilcoxon秩和检验(Wilcoxon rank-sum test):在 1,322 名参与者中,31.2% 的人认为自己是 LGBTQ+,其中 81.8% 是佛教徒。无宗教信仰的 LGBTQ+ 学生比例明显更高(与非 LGBTQ+ 相比,分别为 15.0% 和 8.4%;P = 0.001)。不过,LGBTQ + 学生与非 LGBTQ + 学生之间以及 LGBTQ + 亚群之间在宗教信仰方面没有统计学差异。虽然有 74% 的 LGBTQ + 学生表示家庭支持良好,但认为家庭支持不佳的 LGBTQ + 学生要多得多(与非 LGBTQ + 相比,7.0% 对 4.7%;p = 0.002)。关于向家人公开性别认同或性取向的问题,大多数 LGBTQ+ 表示不公开或不确定。感知到的家庭支持与向家庭成员披露个人身份的可能性之间存在重要关联,因为感知到的支持越好,披露率越高:LGBTQ + 学生和非 LGBTQ + 学生在宗教信仰方面没有明显的统计学差异。大多数 LGBTQ + 医学生表示得到了良好的家庭支持;然而,在那些认为缺乏家庭支持的学生中,他们更倾向于向家人隐瞒自己的性别认同。对于未来的研究而言,至关重要的是调查这种隐瞒是否会延伸到他们生活的其他领域,并评估对他们的福祉(包括心理健康和生活质量)的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信