Disparities in casemix, acute interventions, discharge destinations and mortality of patients with traumatic brain injury between Europe and India.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Deepak Gupta, Ranjit D Singh, Rick Jg Vreeburg, Jeroen Tjm van Dijck, Hugo F den Boogert, Kaveri Sharma, Kokkula Praneeth, David B Clarke, Fiona E Lecky, Andrew Ir Maas, Virendra Deo Sinha, Godard Cw de Ruiter, Wilco C Peul, Thomas A van Essen
{"title":"Disparities in casemix, acute interventions, discharge destinations and mortality of patients with traumatic brain injury between Europe and India.","authors":"Deepak Gupta, Ranjit D Singh, Rick Jg Vreeburg, Jeroen Tjm van Dijck, Hugo F den Boogert, Kaveri Sharma, Kokkula Praneeth, David B Clarke, Fiona E Lecky, Andrew Ir Maas, Virendra Deo Sinha, Godard Cw de Ruiter, Wilco C Peul, Thomas A van Essen","doi":"10.7189/jogh.14.04227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major global health problem that disproportionally affects low- and middle-income countries. The needs for patients with TBI therefore may differ between levels of national development. We aimed to describe differences in epidemiology and acute care provision of TBI between India and Europe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from two prospective observational registry studies - the Collaborative Indian NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI (CINTER-TBI) and the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI (CENTER-TBI), which included TBI patients with an indication for brain CT-scan presenting to 65 centres across Europe and Israel and two trauma centres in India. We performed descriptive analyses of demographic, injury, and treatment characteristics and used random-effects logistic regression with covariate adjustment to examine the likelihood of acute neurosurgical interventions and in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 22 849 patients from CENTER-TBI and 3904 from CINTER-TBI. The median age in Europe was 55 years (IQR = 32-76) compared to 27 years (IQR = 18-40) in India. The most common cause of TBI in Europe were falls (n = 12150 (53%), while traffic incidents predominated in India (n = 2130 (55%)). The proportion of patients with severe TBI was higher in India (n = 867 (22%)) than in Europe (n = 1661 (7%). Professional pre-hospital care involving ambulance service was utilised by three-fourths (n = 17203 (75%)) of European and less than a one-tenth (n = 224 (6%)) of Indian patients in our sample. Patients with severe TBI were more likely to undergo surgical contusion/haematoma evacuation in India compared to Europe (OR = 2.0; 95% CI = 1.7-2.5) and Indian patients had higher odds of undergoing intracranial pressure monitor placement (OR = 2.3; 95% CI = 2.0-2.7). A primary decompressive craniectomy was likewise more often performed in the Indian cohort (OR = 5.1; 95% CI = 3.5-7.5). Discharge destinations in Europe included rehabilitation centres (n = 1261 (6%)) or nursing homes (n = 1208 (5%)), which was rarely the case in India (n = 13 (0%) and n = 9 (0%), respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Substantial disparities between India and Europe exist along the neurotrauma care chain, with both systems being likely to face unique features and challenges in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"14 ","pages":"04227"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.04227","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major global health problem that disproportionally affects low- and middle-income countries. The needs for patients with TBI therefore may differ between levels of national development. We aimed to describe differences in epidemiology and acute care provision of TBI between India and Europe.

Methods: We used data from two prospective observational registry studies - the Collaborative Indian NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI (CINTER-TBI) and the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI (CENTER-TBI), which included TBI patients with an indication for brain CT-scan presenting to 65 centres across Europe and Israel and two trauma centres in India. We performed descriptive analyses of demographic, injury, and treatment characteristics and used random-effects logistic regression with covariate adjustment to examine the likelihood of acute neurosurgical interventions and in-hospital mortality.

Results: We included 22 849 patients from CENTER-TBI and 3904 from CINTER-TBI. The median age in Europe was 55 years (IQR = 32-76) compared to 27 years (IQR = 18-40) in India. The most common cause of TBI in Europe were falls (n = 12150 (53%), while traffic incidents predominated in India (n = 2130 (55%)). The proportion of patients with severe TBI was higher in India (n = 867 (22%)) than in Europe (n = 1661 (7%). Professional pre-hospital care involving ambulance service was utilised by three-fourths (n = 17203 (75%)) of European and less than a one-tenth (n = 224 (6%)) of Indian patients in our sample. Patients with severe TBI were more likely to undergo surgical contusion/haematoma evacuation in India compared to Europe (OR = 2.0; 95% CI = 1.7-2.5) and Indian patients had higher odds of undergoing intracranial pressure monitor placement (OR = 2.3; 95% CI = 2.0-2.7). A primary decompressive craniectomy was likewise more often performed in the Indian cohort (OR = 5.1; 95% CI = 3.5-7.5). Discharge destinations in Europe included rehabilitation centres (n = 1261 (6%)) or nursing homes (n = 1208 (5%)), which was rarely the case in India (n = 13 (0%) and n = 9 (0%), respectively).

Conclusions: Substantial disparities between India and Europe exist along the neurotrauma care chain, with both systems being likely to face unique features and challenges in the future.

欧洲与印度脑外伤患者在病例组合、急性干预、出院目的地和死亡率方面的差异。
背景:创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是一个重大的全球性健康问题,对中低收入国家的影响尤为严重。因此,不同发展水平的国家对创伤性脑损伤患者的需求可能有所不同。我们旨在描述印度和欧洲在创伤性脑损伤流行病学和急症护理方面的差异:我们使用了两项前瞻性观察登记研究的数据--印度 TBI 神经创伤有效性合作研究 (CINTER-TBI) 和欧洲 TBI 神经创伤有效性合作研究 (CENTER-TBI),其中包括在欧洲和以色列的 65 个中心以及印度的两个创伤中心就诊的有脑 CT 扫描指征的 TBI 患者。我们对人口统计学、损伤和治疗特征进行了描述性分析,并使用随机效应逻辑回归和协变量调整来研究急性神经外科干预和院内死亡率的可能性:我们纳入了 22 849 名 CENTER-TBI 患者和 3 904 名 CINTER-TBI 患者。欧洲的中位年龄为 55 岁(IQR = 32-76),而印度为 27 岁(IQR = 18-40)。欧洲最常见的 TBI 原因是跌倒(n = 12150,占 53%),而印度则以交通事故为主(n = 2130,占 55%)。印度严重创伤性脑损伤患者的比例(n = 867 (22%))高于欧洲(n = 1661 (7%))。在我们的样本中,四分之三(n = 17203 (75%))的欧洲患者和不到十分之一(n = 224 (6%))的印度患者使用了救护车提供的专业院前护理。与欧洲相比,印度的严重创伤性脑损伤患者更有可能接受挫伤/血肿清除手术(OR = 2.0; 95% CI = 1.7-2.5),印度患者接受颅内压监测仪的几率更高(OR = 2.3; 95% CI = 2.0-2.7)。同样,印度队列中进行初级减压颅骨切除术的比例更高(OR = 5.1; 95% CI = 3.5-7.5)。欧洲的出院目的地包括康复中心(n = 1261 (6%))或疗养院(n = 1208 (5%)),而印度很少有这种情况(分别为n = 13 (0%)和n = 9 (0%)):结论:印度和欧洲在神经创伤护理链方面存在巨大差异,这两个系统在未来都可能面临独特的特点和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信