In vivo dynamic migration of the posterior interosseous nerve across various elbow and forearm positions.

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Kensuke Ikuta, Hideaki Miyamoto, Takahiro Inui, Hirotaka Kawano
{"title":"In vivo dynamic migration of the posterior interosseous nerve across various elbow and forearm positions.","authors":"Kensuke Ikuta, Hideaki Miyamoto, Takahiro Inui, Hirotaka Kawano","doi":"10.5397/cise.2024.00213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) is at risk of iatrogenic nerve injury during elbow surgery when using a lateral or posterolateral approach. Results of cadaveric studies indicated that maintaining forearm pronation throughout the surgery can help move the PIN away from the surgical window. However, in vivo dynamic migration of the PIN in response to changes in the elbow and forearm position is unclear. This study aimed to clarify the in vivo dynamic migration pattern of the PIN in response to changes in the elbow and forearm position using ultrasound imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 43 upper extremities of 22 healthy volunteers (16 females; mean age, 29 years). Using ultrasound imaging, we measured the shortest distance from the radial head (RH) to the point where the PIN crossed the lateral aspect of the radial axis in six positions of the elbow and forearm: 90° forearm supination, 90° pronation, and neutral forearm position, each at 135° of elbow flexion and 0° of elbow extension.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RH-to-nerve distance was greater during elbow extension than during elbow flexion regardless of the forearm position. However, the maximum migration distance was 3.5 mm when transitioning from elbow extension and forearm pronation (25.1 mm) to elbow flexion and forearm supination (21.6 mm).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although forearm pronation may help move the PIN away from the surgical window, care should be taken not to injure the nerve when performing elbow surgery using a lateral or posterolateral approach. Level of evidence: Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":33981,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2024.00213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) is at risk of iatrogenic nerve injury during elbow surgery when using a lateral or posterolateral approach. Results of cadaveric studies indicated that maintaining forearm pronation throughout the surgery can help move the PIN away from the surgical window. However, in vivo dynamic migration of the PIN in response to changes in the elbow and forearm position is unclear. This study aimed to clarify the in vivo dynamic migration pattern of the PIN in response to changes in the elbow and forearm position using ultrasound imaging.

Methods: This study included 43 upper extremities of 22 healthy volunteers (16 females; mean age, 29 years). Using ultrasound imaging, we measured the shortest distance from the radial head (RH) to the point where the PIN crossed the lateral aspect of the radial axis in six positions of the elbow and forearm: 90° forearm supination, 90° pronation, and neutral forearm position, each at 135° of elbow flexion and 0° of elbow extension.

Results: The RH-to-nerve distance was greater during elbow extension than during elbow flexion regardless of the forearm position. However, the maximum migration distance was 3.5 mm when transitioning from elbow extension and forearm pronation (25.1 mm) to elbow flexion and forearm supination (21.6 mm).

Conclusions: Although forearm pronation may help move the PIN away from the surgical window, care should be taken not to injure the nerve when performing elbow surgery using a lateral or posterolateral approach. Level of evidence: Level III.

骨间后神经在不同肘部和前臂位置的体内动态迁移。
背景:在使用外侧或后外侧入路进行肘关节手术时,骨间后神经(PIN)有先天性神经损伤的风险。尸体研究结果表明,在整个手术过程中保持前臂前伸有助于将 PIN 移离手术窗口。然而,PIN 在体内随肘部和前臂位置变化而发生动态移动的情况尚不清楚。本研究旨在利用超声波成像明确 PIN 在体内随肘部和前臂位置变化而动态移动的模式:本研究包括 22 名健康志愿者(16 名女性,平均年龄 29 岁)的 43 个上肢。通过超声成像,我们测量了在肘部和前臂的六种姿势下,从桡骨头(RH)到 PIN 穿过桡骨轴外侧的点的最短距离:前臂上举 90°、前臂前伸 90°、前臂中立位、肘部屈曲 135°和肘部伸展 0°:结果:无论前臂位置如何,伸肘时RH到神经的距离都大于屈肘时。然而,从肘关节伸展和前臂前伸(25.1 mm)过渡到肘关节屈曲和前臂上伸(21.6 mm)时,最大移行距离为 3.5 mm:结论:尽管前臂上举可帮助 PIN 从手术窗口移开,但在使用外侧或后外侧入路进行肘部手术时应注意不要损伤神经。证据等级:III级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信