A prospective cohort study: promising results with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of anterior bridge plating in adult humeral shaft fractures.

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Gur-Aziz Singh Sidhu, Deepak Jain, Harpal Singh Selhi, Harjot Kaur, Sergio Rowinski, Saphalya Pattnaik, Neil Ashwood
{"title":"A prospective cohort study: promising results with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of anterior bridge plating in adult humeral shaft fractures.","authors":"Gur-Aziz Singh Sidhu, Deepak Jain, Harpal Singh Selhi, Harjot Kaur, Sergio Rowinski, Saphalya Pattnaik, Neil Ashwood","doi":"10.5397/cise.2024.00423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adult humeral shaft fractures have traditionally been managed conservatively, but surgical intervention is considered for displaced fractures or when conservative treatment is unlikely to be successful. The optimal surgical approach remains controversial, with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using plates and screws considered the gold standard. However, concerns about soft tissue damage have led to the development of less invasive techniques, such as anterior bridge plating using minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO). This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of MIPO for humeral shaft fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study included 43 patients who underwent anterior bridge plating with MIPO for closed, displaced humeral shaft fractures. Forty patients had full follow-up (functional and radiological) and three patients were lost to follow-up. Fractures were classified using the AO classification system. Surgical technique involved incision, reduction, and fixation with locking compression plates. Follow-up assessments were conducted at various intervals, and functional outcomes were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fracture union was achieved in 38 of 40 patients (95%). Two patients required secondary bone grafts for non-union. The mean time to union was between 12 and 16 weeks. Excellent shoulder function was observed in 82.5% of patients, and excellent elbow function in 77.5%. The range of motion on the operated side differed statistically significantly from the non-operated side but was not clinically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MIPO with anterior bridge plating is a viable option for the surgical management of humeral shaft fractures. It offers good fracture healing rates and satisfactory functional outcomes and avoids extensive soft tissue dissection associated with ORIF. Level of evidence: II.</p>","PeriodicalId":33981,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2024.00423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adult humeral shaft fractures have traditionally been managed conservatively, but surgical intervention is considered for displaced fractures or when conservative treatment is unlikely to be successful. The optimal surgical approach remains controversial, with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using plates and screws considered the gold standard. However, concerns about soft tissue damage have led to the development of less invasive techniques, such as anterior bridge plating using minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO). This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of MIPO for humeral shaft fractures.

Methods: A prospective cohort study included 43 patients who underwent anterior bridge plating with MIPO for closed, displaced humeral shaft fractures. Forty patients had full follow-up (functional and radiological) and three patients were lost to follow-up. Fractures were classified using the AO classification system. Surgical technique involved incision, reduction, and fixation with locking compression plates. Follow-up assessments were conducted at various intervals, and functional outcomes were evaluated.

Results: Fracture union was achieved in 38 of 40 patients (95%). Two patients required secondary bone grafts for non-union. The mean time to union was between 12 and 16 weeks. Excellent shoulder function was observed in 82.5% of patients, and excellent elbow function in 77.5%. The range of motion on the operated side differed statistically significantly from the non-operated side but was not clinically significant.

Conclusions: MIPO with anterior bridge plating is a viable option for the surgical management of humeral shaft fractures. It offers good fracture healing rates and satisfactory functional outcomes and avoids extensive soft tissue dissection associated with ORIF. Level of evidence: II.

一项前瞻性队列研究:成人肱骨骨干骨折前桥钢板微创骨合成术效果良好。
背景:成人肱骨骨干骨折传统上一直采用保守治疗,但对于移位骨折或保守治疗不太可能成功时,则会考虑手术治疗。最佳手术方法仍存在争议,使用钢板和螺钉的切开复位内固定术(ORIF)被认为是金标准。然而,对软组织损伤的担忧导致了微创技术的发展,如使用微创钢板骨合成术(MIPO)的前桥钢板固定。本研究旨在评估 MIPO 治疗肱骨轴骨折的效果:一项前瞻性队列研究共纳入了43例因闭合性、移位性肱骨轴骨折而接受前方桥接钢板和MIPO的患者。40名患者接受了全面随访(功能和放射学),3名患者失去了随访机会。骨折采用 AO 分类系统进行分类。手术方法包括切开、复位和使用锁定加压钢板固定。每隔一段时间进行一次随访评估,并对功能结果进行评价:结果:40 例患者中有 38 例(95%)实现了骨折愈合。两名患者因骨折未愈合而需要二次植骨。平均愈合时间为 12 至 16 周。82.5%的患者肩关节功能良好,77.5%的患者肘关节功能良好。手术侧的活动范围与非手术侧相比有显著的统计学差异,但无临床意义:结论:前桥钢板 MIPO 是手术治疗肱骨轴骨折的可行方案。结论:前路桥接钢板 MIPO 是手术治疗肱骨轴骨折的可行方案,它具有良好的骨折愈合率和令人满意的功能效果,并避免了与 ORIF 相关的大面积软组织剥离。证据等级:II.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信