EFFECTIVENESS OF THE BALANCED SCORECARD IN IMPROVING STAFF PERFORMANCE, PATIENT OUTCOMES AND RESOURCE OPTIMIZATION IN LOW- AND MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

Q4 Medicine
West African journal of medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-10
J I Aleme, F O Adeniji, D S Ogaji
{"title":"EFFECTIVENESS OF THE BALANCED SCORECARD IN IMPROVING STAFF PERFORMANCE, PATIENT OUTCOMES AND RESOURCE OPTIMIZATION IN LOW- AND MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.","authors":"J I Aleme, F O Adeniji, D S Ogaji","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/background: </strong>Low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) usually have weak health systems with poor health outcomes. The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is a strategic management tool widely used to improve healthcare services by aligning operational activities with long-term objectives across four dimensions namely patient, financial, internal process, and learning and growth. While BSC has been adopted in various high-income countries with positive impacts, its effectiveness in improving public health systems in LMIC is still unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of BSC in public health settings in LMIC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Systematic review was carried out. The search strategy was applied across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and AJOL, from 1995 to September 2024, following the PRISMA guideline. Key criteria were used in the selection of eligible studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,159 articles retrieved from the search, 9 articles were included (3 African and 6 Asian studies). Two were in Upper-Middle, 4 in Lower-Middle, and 3 in low-income settings. One of the studies was a randomized controlled trial, 5 were pre-post and 3 were case studies. The time to evaluation of BSC implementation ranged from 10 months to 5 years. Post - implementation, change in patient satisfaction ranged between 3.7% to 16%, staff satisfaction (0.6% to 4.6%), staff training (14.8% to 35.3%), laboratory functionality (-1.0% to 45.8%), drug availability (1.9% to 17.0%), equipment functionality (11.9% to 22.8%), HMIS use (8.3% to 24.1%), and revenue generation (0.1 to 1.83%).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>The BSC in the majority of the studies was modified and had additional perspectives to suit their context. BSC implementation was mostly led by the Ministry of (Public) Health in the countries as a system-wide approach. Implementation was by incorporating BSC indicators into the National Health Strategic Plan or accreditation standards. Some of the Ministries had funding support from partners and cost was noted as one of the limitations to its adoption. BSC implementation in LMIC generally showed positive improvements especially in staff training and resource optimization through improved capacity for service delivery. There was no appreciable increase in revenue generation but since they were public hospitals, they had less focus on financial perspective and more on patients and efficient resource utilization. It is recommended that Ministries of Health in LMIC develop or adapt and utilize the BSC to drive their health system performance by incorporating the indicators into their national performance indicators.</p><p><strong>Acknowledgments: </strong>This review was funded by the Robert Koch Institute as part of the project 'Capacity Building in Applied Public Health Research in GHPP partner countries - CARE' from funds of the Federal Ministry of Health.</p>","PeriodicalId":23680,"journal":{"name":"West African journal of medicine","volume":"41 11 Suppl 1","pages":"S28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"West African journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/background: Low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) usually have weak health systems with poor health outcomes. The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is a strategic management tool widely used to improve healthcare services by aligning operational activities with long-term objectives across four dimensions namely patient, financial, internal process, and learning and growth. While BSC has been adopted in various high-income countries with positive impacts, its effectiveness in improving public health systems in LMIC is still unclear.

Objective: This review seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of BSC in public health settings in LMIC.

Methods: A Systematic review was carried out. The search strategy was applied across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and AJOL, from 1995 to September 2024, following the PRISMA guideline. Key criteria were used in the selection of eligible studies.

Results: Of 1,159 articles retrieved from the search, 9 articles were included (3 African and 6 Asian studies). Two were in Upper-Middle, 4 in Lower-Middle, and 3 in low-income settings. One of the studies was a randomized controlled trial, 5 were pre-post and 3 were case studies. The time to evaluation of BSC implementation ranged from 10 months to 5 years. Post - implementation, change in patient satisfaction ranged between 3.7% to 16%, staff satisfaction (0.6% to 4.6%), staff training (14.8% to 35.3%), laboratory functionality (-1.0% to 45.8%), drug availability (1.9% to 17.0%), equipment functionality (11.9% to 22.8%), HMIS use (8.3% to 24.1%), and revenue generation (0.1 to 1.83%).

Discussion and conclusion: The BSC in the majority of the studies was modified and had additional perspectives to suit their context. BSC implementation was mostly led by the Ministry of (Public) Health in the countries as a system-wide approach. Implementation was by incorporating BSC indicators into the National Health Strategic Plan or accreditation standards. Some of the Ministries had funding support from partners and cost was noted as one of the limitations to its adoption. BSC implementation in LMIC generally showed positive improvements especially in staff training and resource optimization through improved capacity for service delivery. There was no appreciable increase in revenue generation but since they were public hospitals, they had less focus on financial perspective and more on patients and efficient resource utilization. It is recommended that Ministries of Health in LMIC develop or adapt and utilize the BSC to drive their health system performance by incorporating the indicators into their national performance indicators.

Acknowledgments: This review was funded by the Robert Koch Institute as part of the project 'Capacity Building in Applied Public Health Research in GHPP partner countries - CARE' from funds of the Federal Ministry of Health.

平衡计分卡在中低收入国家提高员工绩效、改善患者疗效和优化资源方面的成效:系统回顾。
导言/背景:中低收入国家(LMIC)的医疗系统通常比较薄弱,医疗效果不佳。平衡计分卡(BSC)是一种战略管理工具,被广泛应用于改善医疗保健服务,其方法是将业务活动与患者、财务、内部流程以及学习与成长四个方面的长期目标相结合。虽然平衡计分卡已在多个高收入国家采用并产生了积极影响,但其在改善低收入和中等收入国家公共卫生系统方面的有效性仍不明确:本综述旨在评估 BSC 在低收入和中等收入国家公共卫生环境中的有效性:方法:开展了一项系统综述。按照 PRISMA 指南,从 1995 年到 2024 年 9 月,在 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、Google Scholar 和 AJOL 上采用了检索策略。结果:在检索到的 1,159 篇文章中,共纳入了 9 篇文章(3 篇非洲研究和 6 篇亚洲研究)。其中 2 篇在中上层国家,4 篇在中下层国家,3 篇在低收入国家。其中一项研究是随机对照试验,5 项是前后对比研究,3 项是案例研究。对实施 BSC 的评估时间从 10 个月到 5 年不等。实施后,患者满意度的变化在 3.7% 到 16% 之间,员工满意度(0.6% 到 4.6%)、员工培训(14.8% 到 35.3%)、实验室功能(-1.0% 到 45.8%)、药品供应(1.9% 到 17.0%)、设备功能(11.9% 到 22.8%)、HMIS 使用(8.3% 到 24.1%)和创收(0.1% 到 1.83%):大多数研究中的 BSC 都经过了修改,并根据具体情况增加了新的视角。在这些国家中,业务支助标准的实施大多由(公共)卫生部领导,是一种全系统方法。实施方式是将 BSC 指标纳入国家卫生战略计划或认证标准。一些部委得到了合作伙伴的资金支持,成本被认为是采用该方法的限制因素之一。在低收入和中等收入国家实施的业务支助标准普遍显示出积极的改进,特别是通过提高提供服务的能力在人员培训和资源优化方面。创收没有明显增加,但由于这些医院是公立医院,因此对财务方面的关注较少,而更多地关注病人和资源的有效利用。建议低收入和中等收入国家的卫生部制定或调整并利用 BSC,将这些指标纳入其国家绩效指标,以推动其卫生系统的绩效:本综述由罗伯特-科赫研究所(Robert Koch Institute)资助,是联邦卫生部资助的 "GHPP伙伴国应用公共卫生研究能力建设--CARE "项目的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
West African journal of medicine
West African journal of medicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
212
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信