The infected blood inquiry: Impact on public perceptions of blood supply risk, safety, and donation attitudes.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Richard Mills, Eva-Maria Merz, Mark Croucher, Barbara Masser, Susan R Brailsford, Robert Smith, Eamonn Ferguson
{"title":"The infected blood inquiry: Impact on public perceptions of blood supply risk, safety, and donation attitudes.","authors":"Richard Mills, Eva-Maria Merz, Mark Croucher, Barbara Masser, Susan R Brailsford, Robert Smith, Eamonn Ferguson","doi":"10.1111/tme.13108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The UK's Infected Blood Inquiry (IBI) highlighted a major public health scandal, with at least 30 000 people infected and more than 3000 deaths attributable to infected blood and blood products. This study investigates the impact of the IBI announcement on May 20, 2024, on public perceptions of blood supply risk, safety, and donation intentions in the UK compared to the USA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 2 (country: UK vs. USA) × 2 (time: pre-, post-IBI announcement) between-within-subject study was conducted with 1635 participants (888 UK, 747 USA). Pre-IBI data were collected from May 3 to 7, 2024, and post-IBI data from May 30 to June 30, 2024. Key measures were perceived infection risk from transfusion, transfusion safety, willingness to donate and encourage others. The impact was assessed using differences-in-differences (DiD) and reliable-change-indices (RCI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>UK participants showed a significant but small decrease in perceived safety compared to USA participants, with 1 in 30 UK individuals perceiving a significant reduction in perceived transfusion safety. Decreases in perceived safety were associated with significant decreases in willingness to donate and encouragement of others in the whole sample and in USA participants and significant decreases in willingness to encourage others in UK participants. Older people reported a greater reduction in safety, and non-donors were more likely to be put off donating and not ask others to donate as a result of their perception that safety had been reduced.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, perceived safety decreased marginally in the UK general population. Future research should explore the long-term impacts of the IBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":23306,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tme.13108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The UK's Infected Blood Inquiry (IBI) highlighted a major public health scandal, with at least 30 000 people infected and more than 3000 deaths attributable to infected blood and blood products. This study investigates the impact of the IBI announcement on May 20, 2024, on public perceptions of blood supply risk, safety, and donation intentions in the UK compared to the USA.

Methods: A 2 (country: UK vs. USA) × 2 (time: pre-, post-IBI announcement) between-within-subject study was conducted with 1635 participants (888 UK, 747 USA). Pre-IBI data were collected from May 3 to 7, 2024, and post-IBI data from May 30 to June 30, 2024. Key measures were perceived infection risk from transfusion, transfusion safety, willingness to donate and encourage others. The impact was assessed using differences-in-differences (DiD) and reliable-change-indices (RCI).

Results: UK participants showed a significant but small decrease in perceived safety compared to USA participants, with 1 in 30 UK individuals perceiving a significant reduction in perceived transfusion safety. Decreases in perceived safety were associated with significant decreases in willingness to donate and encouragement of others in the whole sample and in USA participants and significant decreases in willingness to encourage others in UK participants. Older people reported a greater reduction in safety, and non-donors were more likely to be put off donating and not ask others to donate as a result of their perception that safety had been reduced.

Conclusion: Overall, perceived safety decreased marginally in the UK general population. Future research should explore the long-term impacts of the IBI.

受感染血液调查:对公众对血液供应风险、安全性和捐献态度看法的影响。
背景:英国受感染血液调查(IBI)凸显了一个重大的公共卫生丑闻,至少有3万人受到感染,3000多人死于受感染的血液和血液制品。与美国相比,本研究调查了 2024 年 5 月 20 日宣布的 IBI 对英国公众对血液供应风险、安全性和捐献意愿的看法的影响:方法:对 1635 名参与者(888 名英国人,747 名美国人)进行了一项 2(国家:英国 vs. 美国)×2(时间:IBI 公告发布前、发布后)的主体间研究。IBI 前的数据收集时间为 2024 年 5 月 3 日至 7 日,IBI 后的数据收集时间为 2024 年 5 月 30 日至 6 月 30 日。主要衡量指标包括输血感染风险感知、输血安全性、捐赠意愿和鼓励他人捐赠的意愿。采用差异指数(DiD)和可靠变化指数(RCI)对影响进行评估:结果:与美国参与者相比,英国参与者的输血安全感明显下降,但下降幅度较小,每 30 名英国人中就有 1 人的输血安全感明显下降。在整个样本和美国参与者中,安全感的降低与捐赠意愿和鼓励他人意愿的显著降低有关,而在英国参与者中,鼓励他人意愿的显著降低与安全感的降低有关。老年人的安全感下降幅度更大,非捐献者更有可能因认为安全感下降而放弃捐献或不要求他人捐献:总体而言,英国普通人群的安全感略有下降。未来的研究应探索 IBI 的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfusion Medicine
Transfusion Medicine 医学-血液学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Transfusion Medicine publishes articles on transfusion medicine in its widest context, including blood transfusion practice (blood procurement, pharmaceutical, clinical, scientific, computing and documentary aspects), immunohaematology, immunogenetics, histocompatibility, medico-legal applications, and related molecular biology and biotechnology. In addition to original articles, which may include brief communications and case reports, the journal contains a regular educational section (based on invited reviews and state-of-the-art reports), technical section (including quality assurance and current practice guidelines), leading articles, letters to the editor, occasional historical articles and signed book reviews. Some lectures from Society meetings that are likely to be of general interest to readers of the Journal may be published at the discretion of the Editor and subject to the availability of space in the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信