Perceptions, experiences and concerns with sexually transmitted infections among current and former PrEP users: a longitudinal qualitative study of gay, bisexual and queer men in Canada.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Sexual health Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1071/SH23195
Emerich Daroya, Alex Wells, Mark Gaspar, Jad Sinno, Mark Hull, Nathan J Lachowsky, Darrell H S Tan, Daniel Grace
{"title":"Perceptions, experiences and concerns with sexually transmitted infections among current and former PrEP users: a longitudinal qualitative study of gay, bisexual and queer men in Canada.","authors":"Emerich Daroya, Alex Wells, Mark Gaspar, Jad Sinno, Mark Hull, Nathan J Lachowsky, Darrell H S Tan, Daniel Grace","doi":"10.1071/SH23195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use has been attributed to heightened rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), ostensibly due to increased condomless anal sex (CAS) and greater frequency of STI testing. Few qualitative studies have assessed how gay, bisexual and queer men (GBQM) who use PrEP perceive STIs and how these attitudes have evolved post-PrEP uptake. We investigated the perspectives of current and former PrEP users on STIs. Methods Annual, in-depth longitudinal interviews were conducted with 38 current and former PrEP users in Ontario (n =18) and British Columbia (n =20), Canada, as part of a mixed-methods implementation science study (2020-2022). Over 3years, 109 interviews were conducted. Data analysis included reflexive thematic coding and longitudinal recurrent cross-sectional analysis using NVivo 12. Results Four STI-related themes emerged: (1) lack of STI-related concerns due to treatment and prevention optimism, (2) stigma-related concerns, (3) perceived risk among other PrEP users due to increased CAS, and (4) inconsistent testing concerns among non-PrEP users. Over time, some STI-related anxieties decreased with increased knowledge and reduced stigma. However, concerns persisted for other participants due to perceived risky sexual behaviours among other PrEP users and non-PrEP users. Both current and former PrEP users who expressed STI-related apprehensions consistently indicated adopting risk-reduction strategies, including condom use and having fewer sexual partners throughout the study. Conclusions Findings show how varied STI perceptions and experiences among current and former PrEP users shaped sexual decision-making over time. Providers, public health experts, and policymakers should develop a more comprehensive strategy to address STI concerns among GBQM.</p>","PeriodicalId":22165,"journal":{"name":"Sexual health","volume":"21 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/SH23195","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use has been attributed to heightened rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), ostensibly due to increased condomless anal sex (CAS) and greater frequency of STI testing. Few qualitative studies have assessed how gay, bisexual and queer men (GBQM) who use PrEP perceive STIs and how these attitudes have evolved post-PrEP uptake. We investigated the perspectives of current and former PrEP users on STIs. Methods Annual, in-depth longitudinal interviews were conducted with 38 current and former PrEP users in Ontario (n =18) and British Columbia (n =20), Canada, as part of a mixed-methods implementation science study (2020-2022). Over 3years, 109 interviews were conducted. Data analysis included reflexive thematic coding and longitudinal recurrent cross-sectional analysis using NVivo 12. Results Four STI-related themes emerged: (1) lack of STI-related concerns due to treatment and prevention optimism, (2) stigma-related concerns, (3) perceived risk among other PrEP users due to increased CAS, and (4) inconsistent testing concerns among non-PrEP users. Over time, some STI-related anxieties decreased with increased knowledge and reduced stigma. However, concerns persisted for other participants due to perceived risky sexual behaviours among other PrEP users and non-PrEP users. Both current and former PrEP users who expressed STI-related apprehensions consistently indicated adopting risk-reduction strategies, including condom use and having fewer sexual partners throughout the study. Conclusions Findings show how varied STI perceptions and experiences among current and former PrEP users shaped sexual decision-making over time. Providers, public health experts, and policymakers should develop a more comprehensive strategy to address STI concerns among GBQM.

目前和以前的 PrEP 使用者对性传播感染的看法、经历和担忧:一项针对加拿大男同性恋、双性恋和同性恋男性的纵向定性研究。
背景 使用暴露前预防疗法(PrEP)后,性传播感染(STI)的发病率有所上升,这表面上是由于无套肛交(CAS)的增加和性传播感染检测频率的提高。很少有定性研究对使用 PrEP 的男同性恋者、双性恋者和同性恋者(GBQM)如何看待性传播感染以及这些态度在使用 PrEP 后发生了怎样的变化进行评估。我们调查了目前和以前的 PrEP 使用者对性传播感染的看法。方法 作为一项混合方法实施科学研究(2020-2022 年)的一部分,我们对加拿大安大略省(n =18)和不列颠哥伦比亚省(n =20)的 38 名 PrEP 现使用者和前使用者进行了年度深入纵向访谈。在 3 年的时间里,共进行了 109 次访谈。数据分析包括使用 NVivo 12 进行反思性主题编码和纵向重复横截面分析。结果 出现了四个与性传播感染相关的主题:(1) 由于对治疗和预防持乐观态度而缺乏与性传播感染相关的担忧;(2) 与污名化相关的担忧;(3) 由于 CAS 的增加而认为其他 PrEP 使用者存在风险;(4) 非 PrEP 使用者对检测不一致的担忧。随着时间的推移,一些与性传播感染相关的焦虑随着知识的增加和污名的减少而减少。然而,由于其他 PrEP 使用者和非 PrEP 使用者认为存在危险的性行为,其他参与者的忧虑依然存在。在整个研究过程中,对性传播感染表示担忧的 PrEP 现使用者和前使用者都一致表示采取了降低风险的策略,包括使用安全套和减少性伴侣。结论 研究结果表明,PrEP 的当前使用者和曾经使用者对性传播感染的不同认识和经历如何随着时间的推移影响着他们的性决策。医疗服务提供者、公共卫生专家和政策制定者应制定更全面的策略,以解决 GBQM 对性传播感染的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexual health
Sexual health 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexual Health publishes original and significant contributions to the fields of sexual health including HIV/AIDS, Sexually transmissible infections, issues of sexuality and relevant areas of reproductive health. This journal is directed towards those working in sexual health as clinicians, public health practitioners, researchers in behavioural, clinical, laboratory, public health or social, sciences. The journal publishes peer reviewed original research, editorials, review articles, topical debates, case reports and critical correspondence. Officially sponsored by: The Australasian Chapter of Sexual Health Medicine of RACP Sexual Health Society of Queensland Sexual Health is the official journal of the International Union against Sexually Transmitted Infections (IUSTI), Asia-Pacific, and the Asia-Oceania Federation of Sexology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信