Categorizing Care Delays and Their Impact on Hospital Length of Stay.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Adam D Nadler, Shaker M Eid, Flora Kisuule, Henry J Michtalik, Melinda E Kantsiper, Che M Harris, Venkat P Gundareddy
{"title":"Categorizing Care Delays and Their Impact on Hospital Length of Stay.","authors":"Adam D Nadler, Shaker M Eid, Flora Kisuule, Henry J Michtalik, Melinda E Kantsiper, Che M Harris, Venkat P Gundareddy","doi":"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Unnecessary care delays of hospitalized patients increase the risk of hospital-related complications and drive up health care costs. While health systems focus on reducing the length of stay of hospitalized patients, not many studies looked at specific causes of the care delays that prolong length of stay. In this study, we sought to systematically identify and categorize the various care delays that contribute to prolonged length of stay on a hospital medicine service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study looking at all inpatient encounters to the hospitalist service (N = 6633) for the fiscal year 2021. Observation status, COVID-19 positive, and other services' discharged patients were excluded (N = 2849) leaving 3784 eligible encounters. The resulting 5% stratified random sample accounted for 190 encounters accounting for a total of 1152 patient-days. Using a standardized data extraction tool, a day-by-day review of the sample encounters was performed for all care delays. These care delays were categorized into specific groups (System, Discharge, Provider, Patient/Family, or Consultant related) and subgroups based on predetermined criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stratified sample was found to be comparable to the total patient population, with no statistically significant differences in key demographic and clinical metrics. About 30% of all patient-days had a care delay; 33% of these delays were attributable to system delays internal to the hospital such as waiting for imaging/procedures; 28% of delays were due to discharge barriers, driven overwhelmingly by a lack of available post-acute care beds, and about 20% of delays were attributable to the provider.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study systematically looked at care delays that led to prolonged hospital length of stay. Most of these care delays were caused by either wait times for procedures and imaging studies or by a lack of post-acute care bed availability. Hospitals and health systems can use this approach to better determine which systemic changes are likely to be the most effective at reducing length of stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":20986,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Management in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000503","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Unnecessary care delays of hospitalized patients increase the risk of hospital-related complications and drive up health care costs. While health systems focus on reducing the length of stay of hospitalized patients, not many studies looked at specific causes of the care delays that prolong length of stay. In this study, we sought to systematically identify and categorize the various care delays that contribute to prolonged length of stay on a hospital medicine service.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study looking at all inpatient encounters to the hospitalist service (N = 6633) for the fiscal year 2021. Observation status, COVID-19 positive, and other services' discharged patients were excluded (N = 2849) leaving 3784 eligible encounters. The resulting 5% stratified random sample accounted for 190 encounters accounting for a total of 1152 patient-days. Using a standardized data extraction tool, a day-by-day review of the sample encounters was performed for all care delays. These care delays were categorized into specific groups (System, Discharge, Provider, Patient/Family, or Consultant related) and subgroups based on predetermined criteria.

Results: The stratified sample was found to be comparable to the total patient population, with no statistically significant differences in key demographic and clinical metrics. About 30% of all patient-days had a care delay; 33% of these delays were attributable to system delays internal to the hospital such as waiting for imaging/procedures; 28% of delays were due to discharge barriers, driven overwhelmingly by a lack of available post-acute care beds, and about 20% of delays were attributable to the provider.

Conclusion: Our study systematically looked at care delays that led to prolonged hospital length of stay. Most of these care delays were caused by either wait times for procedures and imaging studies or by a lack of post-acute care bed availability. Hospitals and health systems can use this approach to better determine which systemic changes are likely to be the most effective at reducing length of stay.

护理延迟的分类及其对住院时间的影响。
背景和目的:住院病人不必要的护理延误会增加住院相关并发症的风险,并推高医疗成本。虽然医疗系统注重缩短住院患者的住院时间,但并没有多少研究关注导致住院时间延长的护理延误的具体原因。在这项研究中,我们试图系统地识别导致住院时间延长的各种护理延误,并对其进行分类:我们进行了一项回顾性观察研究,调查了 2021 财年住院医生服务的所有住院病人(N = 6633)。排除了观察状态、COVID-19 阳性和其他服务的出院患者(N = 2849),剩下 3784 例符合条件的患者。由此产生的 5% 分层随机样本包含 190 个病例,总计 1152 个病程。使用标准化数据提取工具,对样本病例的所有护理延迟进行逐日审查。根据预先确定的标准,这些护理延误被分为特定组别(系统、出院、医护人员、患者/家属或顾问相关)和子组别:结果发现,分层样本与患者总人数相当,在主要人口统计学和临床指标上没有显著差异。在所有患者日中,约有30%出现了护理延误;其中33%的延误可归因于医院内部的系统延误,如等待成像/手术;28%的延误可归因于出院障碍,主要原因是缺乏可用的急性期后护理床位;约20%的延误可归因于医疗服务提供者:我们的研究系统地分析了导致住院时间延长的护理延误。这些护理延误大多是由手术和影像检查的等待时间或缺乏后期护理床位造成的。医院和医疗系统可以利用这种方法更好地确定哪些系统性改变可能最有效地缩短住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quality Management in Health Care
Quality Management in Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Quality Management in Health Care (QMHC) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for our readers to explore the theoretical, technical, and strategic elements of health care quality management. The journal''s primary focus is on organizational structure and processes as these affect the quality of care and patient outcomes. In particular, it: -Builds knowledge about the application of statistical tools, control charts, benchmarking, and other devices used in the ongoing monitoring and evaluation of care and of patient outcomes; -Encourages research in and evaluation of the results of various organizational strategies designed to bring about quantifiable improvements in patient outcomes; -Fosters the application of quality management science to patient care processes and clinical decision-making; -Fosters cooperation and communication among health care providers, payers and regulators in their efforts to improve the quality of patient outcomes; -Explores links among the various clinical, technical, administrative, and managerial disciplines involved in patient care, as well as the role and responsibilities of organizational governance in ongoing quality management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信