Social Power May Enhance Workplace Initiative: An Experimental Investigation Among Two Samples.

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Tyler N Livingston, Carter R Adams, Connor MacKinnon
{"title":"Social Power May Enhance Workplace Initiative: An Experimental Investigation Among Two Samples.","authors":"Tyler N Livingston, Carter R Adams, Connor MacKinnon","doi":"10.1177/00332941241302275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) refers to voluntary actions members take to benefit organizational function. However, the benefits of OCB for organizations are sometimes countered by detriments for employees who exhibit them, resulting in threats to organizational members' psychological wellbeing. The present research examined whether social power-the perceived ability to control allocations and outcomes in a social hierarchy-could increase OCB endorsement while buffering against negative personal costs. Indeed, manipulated social power enhanced OCB endorsement. This effect was mediated by increased positive affect and goal seeking among participants assigned to a high-power condition relative to participants assigned to a low-power condition. Further, participants assigned to a high-power (vs. low-power) condition did not report increased occupational burden despite their greater OCB endorsement. Patterns of results were similar among a sample of community members (<i>N</i> = 149; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 37 years) and a sample of university students (<i>N</i> = 129; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 20 years). Organizations might empower members by employing procedural justice principles that facilitate members' meaningful contributions to workplace operations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21149,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Reports","volume":" ","pages":"332941241302275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941241302275","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) refers to voluntary actions members take to benefit organizational function. However, the benefits of OCB for organizations are sometimes countered by detriments for employees who exhibit them, resulting in threats to organizational members' psychological wellbeing. The present research examined whether social power-the perceived ability to control allocations and outcomes in a social hierarchy-could increase OCB endorsement while buffering against negative personal costs. Indeed, manipulated social power enhanced OCB endorsement. This effect was mediated by increased positive affect and goal seeking among participants assigned to a high-power condition relative to participants assigned to a low-power condition. Further, participants assigned to a high-power (vs. low-power) condition did not report increased occupational burden despite their greater OCB endorsement. Patterns of results were similar among a sample of community members (N = 149; Mage = 37 years) and a sample of university students (N = 129; Mage = 20 years). Organizations might empower members by employing procedural justice principles that facilitate members' meaningful contributions to workplace operations.

社会权力可提高工作场所的主动性:两个样本的实验研究
组织公民行为(OCB)是指组织成员为使组织功能受益而采取的自愿行动。然而,组织公民行为对组织的益处有时也会被表现出这种行为的员工的害处所抵消,从而对组织成员的心理健康造成威胁。本研究考察了社会权力--在社会等级制度中控制分配和结果的感知能力--是否能在缓冲个人负面成本的同时增加对组织行为的认可。事实上,受操纵的社会权力增强了对组织共同行动的认可。与分配到低社会权力条件下的参与者相比,分配到高社会权力条件下的参与者的积极情绪和目标追求得到了增强,从而调节了这种效应。此外,被分配到高权力(相对于低权力)条件下的参与者尽管有更多的职业行为支持,但他们并没有报告职业负担的增加。社区成员样本(N = 149;年龄 = 37 岁)和大学生样本(N = 129;年龄 = 20 岁)的结果模式相似。组织可以通过采用程序公正原则来增强成员的能力,从而促进成员为工作场所的运作做出有意义的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Reports
Psychological Reports PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
171
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信