{"title":"The Combined Impact of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior on Executive Functions in Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Hung-Yu Chen, Chen-Sin Hung, Ting-Ting Wu, Fei-Fei Ren, Yu-Kai Chang, Feng-Tzu Chen","doi":"10.2147/PRBM.S486089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The interplay between physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) significantly influences cognitive health in older adults, with executive functions (EFs) being particularly vulnerable to lifestyle factors. However, previous research on older adults focused mainly on PA and is limited due to the lack of comprehensive consideration of other factors that influence EFs. Current guidelines suggest an association between sedentary behavior (SB) and EFs, yet few studies have examined the combined effects of PA and SB on EFs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This cross-sectional study aimed to explore the relationship between PA, SB, and EFs in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 116 healthy older adults aged ≥65 years were recruited and categorized into four groups based on activity lifestyles: higher PA and higher SB (PHSH); higher PA and lower SB (PHSL); lower PA and higher SB (PLSH); and lower PA and lower SB (PLSL). EFs were assessed using the Tower of London (TOL) task and the Stroop test, which measure high-order EFs (planning and problem-solving) and core EFs (inhibitory control), respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PHSL group performed better on the TOL task, with lower total move scores and shorter total problem-solving times, compared to the PLSH group. The total move score of the PLSL group was better, and the total problem-solving time of the PHSH group was shorter than those of the PLSH group. However, the Stroop test scores did not differ between the four groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that increasing PA or reducing SB selectively enhances executive functions, particularly in planning and problem-solving, while less impacting inhibitory control in older adults. This highlights the importance of considering the nuanced effects of PA and SB on different aspects of executing functioning in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":20954,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","volume":"17 ","pages":"3851-3861"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11552394/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S486089","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The interplay between physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) significantly influences cognitive health in older adults, with executive functions (EFs) being particularly vulnerable to lifestyle factors. However, previous research on older adults focused mainly on PA and is limited due to the lack of comprehensive consideration of other factors that influence EFs. Current guidelines suggest an association between sedentary behavior (SB) and EFs, yet few studies have examined the combined effects of PA and SB on EFs.
Objective: This cross-sectional study aimed to explore the relationship between PA, SB, and EFs in older adults.
Methods: A total of 116 healthy older adults aged ≥65 years were recruited and categorized into four groups based on activity lifestyles: higher PA and higher SB (PHSH); higher PA and lower SB (PHSL); lower PA and higher SB (PLSH); and lower PA and lower SB (PLSL). EFs were assessed using the Tower of London (TOL) task and the Stroop test, which measure high-order EFs (planning and problem-solving) and core EFs (inhibitory control), respectively.
Results: The PHSL group performed better on the TOL task, with lower total move scores and shorter total problem-solving times, compared to the PLSH group. The total move score of the PLSL group was better, and the total problem-solving time of the PHSH group was shorter than those of the PLSH group. However, the Stroop test scores did not differ between the four groups.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that increasing PA or reducing SB selectively enhances executive functions, particularly in planning and problem-solving, while less impacting inhibitory control in older adults. This highlights the importance of considering the nuanced effects of PA and SB on different aspects of executing functioning in older adults.
期刊介绍：
Psychology Research and Behavior Management is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on the science of psychology and its application in behavior management to develop improved outcomes in the clinical, educational, sports and business arenas. Specific topics covered in the journal include: -Neuroscience, memory and decision making -Behavior modification and management -Clinical applications -Business and sports performance management -Social and developmental studies -Animal studies The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical studies, surveys, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
