Yubo Guo, Lu Lin, Shihai Zhao, Gan Sun, Yuyan Chen, Ke Xue, Yuxin Yang, Shuo Chen, Yan Zhang, Guobin Li, Yanjie Zhu, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Yining Wang
{"title":"Myocardial Fibrosis Assessment at 3-T versus 5-T Myocardial Late Gadolinium Enhancement MRI: Early Results.","authors":"Yubo Guo, Lu Lin, Shihai Zhao, Gan Sun, Yuyan Chen, Ke Xue, Yuxin Yang, Shuo Chen, Yan Zhang, Guobin Li, Yanjie Zhu, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Yining Wang","doi":"10.1148/radiol.233424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Cardiac MRI at 5 T has recently become available and potentially improves tissue contrast enhancement at gadolinium chelate-enhanced T1-weighted imaging. Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of 5-T myocardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI in assessing myocardial fibrosis by comparing image quality and LGE quantification with reference-standard 3-T myocardial LGE MRI. Materials and Methods Consecutive patients with confirmed myocardial fibrosis on previous 3-T MRI scans between January 2023 and July 2023 prospectively underwent follow-up imaging from August 2023 to November 2023. Each participant underwent follow-up 5-T imaging using an identical dose of contrast agent. Radiologist scoring of image quality using a Likert scale (range, 1-5), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), contrast ratio, and semiautomatic quantitative LGE assessment were obtained and reported as medians and IQRs. Paired Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare characteristics derived at 3-T and 5-T imaging. Results A total of 18 participants (mean age, 49 years ± 17 [SD]; nine male participants) were included, with a mean interval of 6.2 months ± 2.3 between undergoing 3-T and 5-T MRI. Median image quality scores were 4.0 (IQR, 3.0-4.2) at 3 T and 4.0 (IQR, 3.0-4.4) at 5 T (<i>P</i> = .45). SNR at 5 T was higher than at 3 T (183.7 [IQR, 147.2-255.9] vs 125.8 [IQR, 108.2-171.6], respectively; <i>P</i> = .002). Median CNR at 5 T was higher than at 3 T in normal myocardium (50.8 [IQR, 35.4-67.9] vs 16.5 [IQR, 11.3-24.6], respectively) and pericardial fat (21.4 [IQR, 7.1-29.3] vs -5.0 [IQR, -16.4 to -2.3], respectively) (both <i>P</i> < .001). There was no evidence of a difference in the percentage of LGE quantified between 5 T and 3 T (median, 11.8% [IQR, 7.7%-20.5%] vs 12.6% [IQR, 6.6%-20.4%], respectively; <i>P</i> = .81). Conclusion Myocardial LGE MRI at 5 T was found to be feasible, with no evidence of differences in subjective image quality and myocardial fibrosis quantification compared with 3-T myocardial LGE MRI. Furthermore, with use of identical contrast agent doses, SNRs and CNRs were improved at 5 T. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Czum in this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"313 2","pages":"e233424"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.233424","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Cardiac MRI at 5 T has recently become available and potentially improves tissue contrast enhancement at gadolinium chelate-enhanced T1-weighted imaging. Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of 5-T myocardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI in assessing myocardial fibrosis by comparing image quality and LGE quantification with reference-standard 3-T myocardial LGE MRI. Materials and Methods Consecutive patients with confirmed myocardial fibrosis on previous 3-T MRI scans between January 2023 and July 2023 prospectively underwent follow-up imaging from August 2023 to November 2023. Each participant underwent follow-up 5-T imaging using an identical dose of contrast agent. Radiologist scoring of image quality using a Likert scale (range, 1-5), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), contrast ratio, and semiautomatic quantitative LGE assessment were obtained and reported as medians and IQRs. Paired Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare characteristics derived at 3-T and 5-T imaging. Results A total of 18 participants (mean age, 49 years ± 17 [SD]; nine male participants) were included, with a mean interval of 6.2 months ± 2.3 between undergoing 3-T and 5-T MRI. Median image quality scores were 4.0 (IQR, 3.0-4.2) at 3 T and 4.0 (IQR, 3.0-4.4) at 5 T (P = .45). SNR at 5 T was higher than at 3 T (183.7 [IQR, 147.2-255.9] vs 125.8 [IQR, 108.2-171.6], respectively; P = .002). Median CNR at 5 T was higher than at 3 T in normal myocardium (50.8 [IQR, 35.4-67.9] vs 16.5 [IQR, 11.3-24.6], respectively) and pericardial fat (21.4 [IQR, 7.1-29.3] vs -5.0 [IQR, -16.4 to -2.3], respectively) (both P < .001). There was no evidence of a difference in the percentage of LGE quantified between 5 T and 3 T (median, 11.8% [IQR, 7.7%-20.5%] vs 12.6% [IQR, 6.6%-20.4%], respectively; P = .81). Conclusion Myocardial LGE MRI at 5 T was found to be feasible, with no evidence of differences in subjective image quality and myocardial fibrosis quantification compared with 3-T myocardial LGE MRI. Furthermore, with use of identical contrast agent doses, SNRs and CNRs were improved at 5 T. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Czum in this issue.
期刊介绍:
Published regularly since 1923 by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), Radiology has long been recognized as the authoritative reference for the most current, clinically relevant and highest quality research in the field of radiology. Each month the journal publishes approximately 240 pages of peer-reviewed original research, authoritative reviews, well-balanced commentary on significant articles, and expert opinion on new techniques and technologies.
Radiology publishes cutting edge and impactful imaging research articles in radiology and medical imaging in order to help improve human health.