Disparities in trends of smoke-free home associated with socioeconomic disadvantages in the United States from 2001 to 2019

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Boram Lee , Douglas E. Levy
{"title":"Disparities in trends of smoke-free home associated with socioeconomic disadvantages in the United States from 2001 to 2019","authors":"Boram Lee ,&nbsp;Douglas E. Levy","doi":"10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine disparities in trends of smoke-free home (SFH) rule prevalence in the United States from 2001 to 2019 by individuals' number of socioeconomic disadvantages.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were drawn from the 2001–2019 Tobacco Use Supplements to the U.S. Current Population Survey, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. The sample comprised respondents (aged≥18 years) who answered items about SFH rules and socioeconomic disadvantage, defined as past-month unemployment, income below the federal poverty line, and/or education less than a high school diploma (<em>N</em> = 867,552). Multivariable logistic regressions estimated associations between adoption of an SFH rule and the number of socioeconomic disadvantages, including interaction terms between time and disadvantages, to assess changes in disparities over time.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>SFH prevalence increased substantially from 64.6 % in 2001–2002 to 89.0 % in 2018–2019. Differences in SFH prevalence by socioeconomic disadvantage narrowed somewhat over the 19 years among non-smokers but widened among smokers. Among non-smokers, SFH prevalence increased by 17.2 ppt (76.5 % to 93.7 %) for those without disadvantages, while it increased by 24.3 ppt (61.8 % to 86.1 %) among those with three disadvantages. In contrast, among smokers, increases in SFH prevalence over time were smaller among those with one (22.8 % to 51.5 %), two (19.5 % to 45.1 %), and three disadvantages (17.3 % to 37.1 %), compared with those without disadvantages (27.7 % to 61.4 %). The widened disparities were found even among smokers living with children.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite a large increase in the SFH prevalence, disparities remain. Our findings underscore the need for continued efforts to promote SFH, particularly among socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20339,"journal":{"name":"Preventive medicine","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 108173"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743524003281","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine disparities in trends of smoke-free home (SFH) rule prevalence in the United States from 2001 to 2019 by individuals' number of socioeconomic disadvantages.

Methods

Data were drawn from the 2001–2019 Tobacco Use Supplements to the U.S. Current Population Survey, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. The sample comprised respondents (aged≥18 years) who answered items about SFH rules and socioeconomic disadvantage, defined as past-month unemployment, income below the federal poverty line, and/or education less than a high school diploma (N = 867,552). Multivariable logistic regressions estimated associations between adoption of an SFH rule and the number of socioeconomic disadvantages, including interaction terms between time and disadvantages, to assess changes in disparities over time.

Results

SFH prevalence increased substantially from 64.6 % in 2001–2002 to 89.0 % in 2018–2019. Differences in SFH prevalence by socioeconomic disadvantage narrowed somewhat over the 19 years among non-smokers but widened among smokers. Among non-smokers, SFH prevalence increased by 17.2 ppt (76.5 % to 93.7 %) for those without disadvantages, while it increased by 24.3 ppt (61.8 % to 86.1 %) among those with three disadvantages. In contrast, among smokers, increases in SFH prevalence over time were smaller among those with one (22.8 % to 51.5 %), two (19.5 % to 45.1 %), and three disadvantages (17.3 % to 37.1 %), compared with those without disadvantages (27.7 % to 61.4 %). The widened disparities were found even among smokers living with children.

Conclusion

Despite a large increase in the SFH prevalence, disparities remain. Our findings underscore the need for continued efforts to promote SFH, particularly among socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers.
2001 年至 2019 年美国与社会经济劣势相关的无烟家庭趋势差异。
目的研究2001年至2019年美国无烟家庭(SFH)规则普及率趋势的差异,按个人的社会经济劣势数量进行分类:数据来自 2001-2019 年美国当前人口调查烟草使用补充资料,这是一项具有全国代表性的横断面调查。样本包括回答有关 SFH 规则和社会经济劣势(定义为上月失业、收入低于联邦贫困线和/或教育程度低于高中文凭)项目的受访者(年龄≥18 岁)(N = 867,552 人)。多变量逻辑回归估算了采用自费住房规则与社会经济劣势数量之间的关联,包括时间与劣势之间的交互项,以评估差异随时间的变化:SFH的流行率从2001-2002年的64.6%大幅上升至2018-2019年的89.0%。19年间,非吸烟者中因社会经济劣势而导致的SFH患病率差异有所缩小,但吸烟者中的差异却有所扩大。在非吸烟者中,无劣势人群的SFH患病率增加了17.2个百分点(从76.5%上升到93.7%),而有三种劣势人群的SFH患病率增加了24.3个百分点(从61.8%上升到86.1%)。相比之下,在吸烟者中,有一项不利条件(22.8%至51.5%)、两项不利条件(19.5%至45.1%)和三项不利条件(17.3%至37.1%)的吸烟者的 SFH 患病率随时间推移的增长幅度要小于没有不利条件的吸烟者(27.7%至61.4%)。即使在与子女同住的吸烟者中,差距也有所扩大:尽管 SFH 患病率大幅上升,但差距依然存在。我们的研究结果表明,有必要继续努力推广自律吸烟,尤其是在社会经济条件较差的吸烟者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Preventive medicine
Preventive medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1972 by Ernst Wynder, Preventive Medicine is an international scholarly journal that provides prompt publication of original articles on the science and practice of disease prevention, health promotion, and public health policymaking. Preventive Medicine aims to reward innovation. It will favor insightful observational studies, thoughtful explorations of health data, unsuspected new angles for existing hypotheses, robust randomized controlled trials, and impartial systematic reviews. Preventive Medicine''s ultimate goal is to publish research that will have an impact on the work of practitioners of disease prevention and health promotion, as well as of related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信