Quality assurance of internal mammary node irradiation in the DBCG IMN2 study

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Lasse Refsgaard , Emma S. Buhl , Anders W. Mølby Nielsen , Mette S. Thomsen , Karen Andersen , Ingelise Jensen , Martin Berg , Ebbe L. Lorenzen , Lise B.J. Thorsen , Jens Overgaard , Stine S. Korreman , Birgitte V. Offersen , on behalf of the DBCG RT Committee
{"title":"Quality assurance of internal mammary node irradiation in the DBCG IMN2 study","authors":"Lasse Refsgaard ,&nbsp;Emma S. Buhl ,&nbsp;Anders W. Mølby Nielsen ,&nbsp;Mette S. Thomsen ,&nbsp;Karen Andersen ,&nbsp;Ingelise Jensen ,&nbsp;Martin Berg ,&nbsp;Ebbe L. Lorenzen ,&nbsp;Lise B.J. Thorsen ,&nbsp;Jens Overgaard ,&nbsp;Stine S. Korreman ,&nbsp;Birgitte V. Offersen ,&nbsp;on behalf of the DBCG RT Committee","doi":"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose/objective</h3><div>The Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) IMN2 study investigated the gain from internal mammary node irradiation (IMNI) in node-positive breast cancer patients. IMNI was indicated in right-sided patients, but not in left-sided. Target volume delineations were based on bony landmarks in contrast to the contemporary vessel-based ESTRO consensus guideline. Our objective was to compare IMNI doses in right-sided versus left-sided patients.</div></div><div><h3>Material/methods</h3><div>Treatment plans and delineated structures including CTVn_IMN (IMN_old) from 2008 to 2014 were collected from the DBCG RT Nation study. During the study period, IMN_old was only delineated in right-sided patients. Right and left-sided CTVn_IMN structures were auto-segmented following the ESTRO guidelines (IMN_ESTRO). Due to cranial discordance between IMN_old and IMN_ESTRO, the IMN_ESTRO models were separated into IMN_ESTRO_cranial and IMN_ESTRO_intercostal space(IC)1-3, IC1-4, and IC4_only.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Treatment plans for 2837 patients were available (62.5 % of patients in the IMN2 study). In right-sided patients, the median IMN_old dose coverage (92.4 %) was higher than IMN_ESTRO (71.7 %), p &lt; 0.001. Dose coverage in IMN_ESTRO_IC1-3 was comparable to IMN_old. Comparing IMN_ESTRO_IC1-3 in all patients by laterality, the median CTVn_V90% was 94.6 % (IQR 64.8–100.0) in right-sided patients and 20.4 % (IQR 0.9–55.8) in left-sided patients, p &lt; 0.001. For right-sided patients, median CTV_V90% was 82.3 % in IMN_ESTRO_IC4_only. Median mean heart doses were lower in right-sided patients (1.2 Gy) than in left-sided (2.3 Gy), p &lt; 0.001. Median mean lung doses were higher in right-sided patients (16.0 Gy) than in left-sided (12.7 Gy), p &lt; 0.001.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>For IMN_ESTRO_IC1-3, we found a significantly higher IMN dose coverage in right-sided than in left-sided patients supporting treatment according to study guidelines in the DBCG IMN2 study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 110600"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814024042622","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/objective

The Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) IMN2 study investigated the gain from internal mammary node irradiation (IMNI) in node-positive breast cancer patients. IMNI was indicated in right-sided patients, but not in left-sided. Target volume delineations were based on bony landmarks in contrast to the contemporary vessel-based ESTRO consensus guideline. Our objective was to compare IMNI doses in right-sided versus left-sided patients.

Material/methods

Treatment plans and delineated structures including CTVn_IMN (IMN_old) from 2008 to 2014 were collected from the DBCG RT Nation study. During the study period, IMN_old was only delineated in right-sided patients. Right and left-sided CTVn_IMN structures were auto-segmented following the ESTRO guidelines (IMN_ESTRO). Due to cranial discordance between IMN_old and IMN_ESTRO, the IMN_ESTRO models were separated into IMN_ESTRO_cranial and IMN_ESTRO_intercostal space(IC)1-3, IC1-4, and IC4_only.

Results

Treatment plans for 2837 patients were available (62.5 % of patients in the IMN2 study). In right-sided patients, the median IMN_old dose coverage (92.4 %) was higher than IMN_ESTRO (71.7 %), p < 0.001. Dose coverage in IMN_ESTRO_IC1-3 was comparable to IMN_old. Comparing IMN_ESTRO_IC1-3 in all patients by laterality, the median CTVn_V90% was 94.6 % (IQR 64.8–100.0) in right-sided patients and 20.4 % (IQR 0.9–55.8) in left-sided patients, p < 0.001. For right-sided patients, median CTV_V90% was 82.3 % in IMN_ESTRO_IC4_only. Median mean heart doses were lower in right-sided patients (1.2 Gy) than in left-sided (2.3 Gy), p < 0.001. Median mean lung doses were higher in right-sided patients (16.0 Gy) than in left-sided (12.7 Gy), p < 0.001.

Conclusion

For IMN_ESTRO_IC1-3, we found a significantly higher IMN dose coverage in right-sided than in left-sided patients supporting treatment according to study guidelines in the DBCG IMN2 study.
DBCG IMN2 研究中乳腺内结节照射的质量保证。
目的/目标:丹麦乳腺癌小组(DBCG)IMN2 研究调查了结节阳性乳腺癌(BC)患者从乳腺内结节照射(IMNI)中获得的收益。IMNI适用于右侧患者,但不适用于左侧患者。靶区的划分基于骨性地标,这与当代基于血管的 ESTRO 共识指南不同。我们的目标是比较右侧和左侧患者的 IMNI 剂量:从 DBCG RT Nation 研究中收集了 2008 年至 14 年的治疗计划和划定结构,包括 CTVn_IMN(IMN_old)。在研究期间,仅在右侧患者中划定了 IMN_old。根据 ESTRO 指南(IMN_ESTRO)对右侧和左侧 CTVn_IMN 结构进行了自动分割。由于 IMN_old 和 IMN_ESTRO 的颅骨不一致,IMN_ESTRO 模型被分为 IMN_ESTRO_颅骨和 IMN_ESTRO_肋间隙(IC)1-3、IC1-4 和 IC4_only:有 2,837 名患者(占 IMN2 研究中患者的 62.5%)的治疗计划可供选择。在右侧患者中,IMN_old 的中位剂量覆盖率(92.4%)高于 IMN_ESTRO(71.7%),P 结论:对于 IMN_ESTRO_IC1-3,我们发现右侧患者的 IMN 剂量覆盖率明显高于左侧患者,支持根据研究指南进行治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Radiotherapy and Oncology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信