{"title":"First-Line Durvalumab plus Tremelimumab Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Real-World Clinical Practice.","authors":"Yasutoshi Fujii, Tomokazu Kawaoka, Yuki Shirane, Ryoichi Miura, Hikaru Nakahara, Kenji Yamaoka, Shinsuke Uchikawa, Hatsue Fujino, Atsushi Ono, Eisuke Murakami, Daiki Miki, Nelson Clair Hayes, Masataka Tsuge, Yuko Nakamura, Kazuo Awai, Shiro Oka","doi":"10.1159/000542517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Durvalumab plus tremelimumab combination therapy (STRIDE regimen) is a new first-line option for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), but little real-world data are available to determine which patients are most likely to respond.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively evaluated patients with uHCC who were treated with the STRIDE regimen as the 1st line at our hospital. The primary endpoint of the study was the objective response rate (ORR). We focused on identifying factors associated with cases that had a favorable response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one patients were included. In best response, there were 11 partial response cases, with an ORR of 52.4%. Median progression-free survival was 6.8 months, and overall survival did not reach the median time. A high tumor-to-liver ratio of the maximum value of the standardized uptake value (TLR) on baseline fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) was associated with response, while TLRs were significantly higher in poorly differentiated uHCC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The STRIDE regimen may be beneficial for systemic therapy-naive uHCC patients. High TLR on baseline FDG-PET could be a potentially useful biomarker for response.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542517","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Durvalumab plus tremelimumab combination therapy (STRIDE regimen) is a new first-line option for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), but little real-world data are available to determine which patients are most likely to respond.
Methods: This study retrospectively evaluated patients with uHCC who were treated with the STRIDE regimen as the 1st line at our hospital. The primary endpoint of the study was the objective response rate (ORR). We focused on identifying factors associated with cases that had a favorable response.
Results: Twenty-one patients were included. In best response, there were 11 partial response cases, with an ORR of 52.4%. Median progression-free survival was 6.8 months, and overall survival did not reach the median time. A high tumor-to-liver ratio of the maximum value of the standardized uptake value (TLR) on baseline fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) was associated with response, while TLRs were significantly higher in poorly differentiated uHCC.
Conclusion: The STRIDE regimen may be beneficial for systemic therapy-naive uHCC patients. High TLR on baseline FDG-PET could be a potentially useful biomarker for response.
期刊介绍:
Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.