Effects of Licorice Functional Components Intakes on Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and NETWORK Toxicology.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Nutrients Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI:10.3390/nu16213768
Tianyu Wu, Jingyi Yang, Jiayue Xia, Guiju Sun
{"title":"Effects of Licorice Functional Components Intakes on Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and NETWORK Toxicology.","authors":"Tianyu Wu, Jingyi Yang, Jiayue Xia, Guiju Sun","doi":"10.3390/nu16213768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effects of licorice functional ingredient intake on blood pressure, explore its potential mechanisms of action, and provide safety information for personalized nutritional interventions in special populations and for the application of licorice-derived functional foods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, EBSCO, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to 31 August 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the intake of licorice or its functional components were included. The range of continuous variables was assessed using the weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals. Genes associated with hypertension were screened using an online database. Machine learning, receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve analysis, molecular docking, and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were employed to explore the potential mechanisms underlying licorice-induced blood pressure fluctuations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight RCTs (541 participants) were included in the meta-analysis, which indicated interventions containing glycyrrhizic acid (GA) as the main component increased systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (SBP: WMD [95% <i>CI</i>] = 3.48 [2.74, 4.21], <i>p</i> < 0.001; DBP: WMD [95% <i>CI</i>] = 1.27 [0.76, 1.78], <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, interventions dominated by licorice flavonoids(LF) had no significant effect on SBP or DBP (SBP: WMD [95% <i>CI</i>] = 0.58 [-1.15, 2.31], <i>p</i> = 0.511; DBP: WMD [95% <i>CI</i>] = 0.17 [-1.53, 1.88], <i>p</i> = 0.843). Three machine learning algorithms identified five biomarkers associated with hypertension: calmodulin 3 (CALM3), cluster of differentiation 9 (CD9), growth factor independence 1B transcriptional repressor (GFI1B), myosin light chain kinase (MYLK), and Ras suppressor-1 (RSU1). After removing biomarkers with lower validity and reliability, GFI1B, MYLK, and RSU1 were selected for subsequent analysis. The network toxicology results suggested that GA and its metabolite glycyrrhetinic acid may act on GFI1B, MYLK, and RSU1, influencing blood pressure fluctuations by modulating nitrogen metabolism signaling pathways.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were distinct differences in the effects of licorice functional components on blood pressure. Functional constituents dominated by GA were shown to increase both SBP and DBP, whereas those dominated by LF did not exhibit significant effects on blood pressure. The hypertensive mechanism of GA may involve the modulation of GFI1B, MYLK, and RSU1 to regulate nitrogen metabolic pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":19486,"journal":{"name":"Nutrients","volume":"16 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11547873/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrients","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16213768","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effects of licorice functional ingredient intake on blood pressure, explore its potential mechanisms of action, and provide safety information for personalized nutritional interventions in special populations and for the application of licorice-derived functional foods.

Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, EBSCO, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to 31 August 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the intake of licorice or its functional components were included. The range of continuous variables was assessed using the weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals. Genes associated with hypertension were screened using an online database. Machine learning, receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve analysis, molecular docking, and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were employed to explore the potential mechanisms underlying licorice-induced blood pressure fluctuations.

Results: Eight RCTs (541 participants) were included in the meta-analysis, which indicated interventions containing glycyrrhizic acid (GA) as the main component increased systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (SBP: WMD [95% CI] = 3.48 [2.74, 4.21], p < 0.001; DBP: WMD [95% CI] = 1.27 [0.76, 1.78], p < 0.001). However, interventions dominated by licorice flavonoids(LF) had no significant effect on SBP or DBP (SBP: WMD [95% CI] = 0.58 [-1.15, 2.31], p = 0.511; DBP: WMD [95% CI] = 0.17 [-1.53, 1.88], p = 0.843). Three machine learning algorithms identified five biomarkers associated with hypertension: calmodulin 3 (CALM3), cluster of differentiation 9 (CD9), growth factor independence 1B transcriptional repressor (GFI1B), myosin light chain kinase (MYLK), and Ras suppressor-1 (RSU1). After removing biomarkers with lower validity and reliability, GFI1B, MYLK, and RSU1 were selected for subsequent analysis. The network toxicology results suggested that GA and its metabolite glycyrrhetinic acid may act on GFI1B, MYLK, and RSU1, influencing blood pressure fluctuations by modulating nitrogen metabolism signaling pathways.

Conclusions: There were distinct differences in the effects of licorice functional components on blood pressure. Functional constituents dominated by GA were shown to increase both SBP and DBP, whereas those dominated by LF did not exhibit significant effects on blood pressure. The hypertensive mechanism of GA may involve the modulation of GFI1B, MYLK, and RSU1 to regulate nitrogen metabolic pathways.

甘草功能成分摄入量对血压的影响:带 Meta 分析的系统综述》和《网络毒理学》。
目的研究甘草功能成分摄入对血压的影响,探索其潜在的作用机制,为特殊人群的个性化营养干预和甘草衍生功能食品的应用提供安全信息:方法:对 PubMed、Cochrane Library、Medline、Embase、EBSCO、ScienceDirect 和 Web of Science 等数据库进行了检索,检索期从开始至 2024 年 8 月 31 日。纳入了调查甘草或其功能成分摄入量的随机对照试验(RCT)。连续变量的范围采用加权平均差(WMD)和 95% 置信区间进行评估。使用在线数据库筛选了与高血压相关的基因。采用机器学习、接收者操作特征曲线分析、分子对接和基因组富集分析(GSEA)来探索甘草诱导血压波动的潜在机制:结果表明,以甘草酸(GA)为主要成分的干预措施会增加收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)(SBP:WMD [95% CI] = 3.48 [2.74, 4.21],p < 0.001;DBP:WMD [95% CI] = 1.27 [0.76, 1.78],p < 0.001)。然而,以甘草黄酮(LF)为主的干预措施对 SBP 或 DBP 没有显著影响(SBP:WMD [95% CI] = 0.58 [-1.15, 2.31],p = 0.511;DBP:WMD [95% CI] = 0.17 [-1.53, 1.88],p = 0.843)。三种机器学习算法确定了五个与高血压相关的生物标记物:钙调蛋白 3 (CALM3)、分化簇 9 (CD9)、生长因子独立性 1B 转录抑制因子 (GFI1B)、肌球蛋白轻链激酶 (MYLK) 和 Ras 抑制因子-1 (RSU1)。在剔除有效性和可靠性较低的生物标记物后,GFI1B、MYLK 和 RSU1 被选中进行后续分析。网络毒理学结果表明,GA及其代谢产物甘草亭酸可能作用于GFI1B、MYLK和RSU1,通过调节氮代谢信号通路影响血压波动:甘草功能成分对血压的影响存在明显差异。结论:甘草功能成分对血压的影响存在明显差异,以 GA 为主的功能成分可增加 SBP 和 DBP,而以 LF 为主的功能成分对血压的影响不明显。GA 的高血压机制可能涉及调节 GFI1B、MYLK 和 RSU1,从而调节氮代谢途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrients
Nutrients NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
15.30%
发文量
4599
审稿时长
16.74 days
期刊介绍: Nutrients (ISSN 2072-6643) is an international, peer-reviewed open access advanced forum for studies related to Human Nutrition. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信