Unravelling the complexity of suicidality: a network analysis of theory-driven and culturally relevant suicide risk factors in a country with high suicide rates.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-10 DOI:10.1080/08039488.2024.2424960
Jurgita Rimkevičienė, Dovilė Grigienė, Said Dadašev, Paulius Skruibis, Danutė Gailienė
{"title":"Unravelling the complexity of suicidality: a network analysis of theory-driven and culturally relevant suicide risk factors in a country with high suicide rates.","authors":"Jurgita Rimkevičienė, Dovilė Grigienė, Said Dadašev, Paulius Skruibis, Danutė Gailienė","doi":"10.1080/08039488.2024.2424960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to explore whether individual theory-based constructs are sufficient in explaining suicidality in a culture marked by high suicide rates and whether, if any, culturally relevant factors need to be considered additionally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study used a community sample of 1873 Lithuanian adults (age <i>M</i> = 43.61 SD = 16.96, 69.1% female). A survey using online and pen-and-paper formats was conducted, measuring suicidality, the main constructs from two predominant theories of suicide (thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, acquired capability for suicide, and defeat and entrapment), and culturally relevant factors (gender role expectations, attitudes towards help-seeking, perfectionism, negative social comparisons, alcohol use, child-parent relationships and childhood experiences). Network analysis method was used in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the key factors identified in the two theories perceived burdensomeness had stronger links with self-perceived risk for suicide compared to thwarted belongingness and entrapment. Acquired capability to suicide had no direct links with other factors in the network apart from a weak link with history of suicidal behavior. In the network some of the culturally relevant variables (reasons for alcohol use, experience of sexual abuse, emotional neglect, and cultural norms representing restricted emotionality and attitudes towards psychological help) had direct relationships with suicidality, not only <i>via</i> key theory based factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest the need to consider cultural context when applying universal suicide theories.</p>","PeriodicalId":19201,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"743-751"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2024.2424960","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to explore whether individual theory-based constructs are sufficient in explaining suicidality in a culture marked by high suicide rates and whether, if any, culturally relevant factors need to be considered additionally.

Methods: The study used a community sample of 1873 Lithuanian adults (age M = 43.61 SD = 16.96, 69.1% female). A survey using online and pen-and-paper formats was conducted, measuring suicidality, the main constructs from two predominant theories of suicide (thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, acquired capability for suicide, and defeat and entrapment), and culturally relevant factors (gender role expectations, attitudes towards help-seeking, perfectionism, negative social comparisons, alcohol use, child-parent relationships and childhood experiences). Network analysis method was used in the analysis.

Results: From the key factors identified in the two theories perceived burdensomeness had stronger links with self-perceived risk for suicide compared to thwarted belongingness and entrapment. Acquired capability to suicide had no direct links with other factors in the network apart from a weak link with history of suicidal behavior. In the network some of the culturally relevant variables (reasons for alcohol use, experience of sexual abuse, emotional neglect, and cultural norms representing restricted emotionality and attitudes towards psychological help) had direct relationships with suicidality, not only via key theory based factors.

Conclusions: The results suggest the need to consider cultural context when applying universal suicide theories.

揭示自杀的复杂性:在一个自杀率较高的国家对理论驱动和文化相关的自杀风险因素进行网络分析。
目的:本研究旨在探讨以个体理论为基础的建构是否足以解释高自杀率文化中的自杀倾向,以及是否需要额外考虑与文化相关的因素:研究使用了 1873 个立陶宛成年人的社区样本(年龄中位数 = 43.61,标准差 = 16.96,69.1% 为女性)。调查采用在线和纸笔两种形式,测量自杀倾向、两种主要自杀理论的主要结构(挫败的归属感、感知到的负担、获得的自杀能力以及挫败和禁锢)以及文化相关因素(性别角色期望、寻求帮助的态度、完美主义、消极的社会比较、饮酒、子女与父母的关系以及童年经历)。分析采用了网络分析方法:从这两种理论所确定的关键因素来看,与归属感受挫和被禁锢相比,感知到的负担与自我感觉的自杀风险有更强的联系。除了与自杀行为史有微弱联系外,后天自杀能力与网络中的其他因素没有直接联系。在该网络中,一些与文化相关的变量(酗酒原因、性虐待经历、情感忽视以及代表情感受限和对心理帮助的态度的文化规范)与自杀有直接关系,而不仅仅是通过基于关键理论的因素:结论:研究结果表明,在应用普遍自杀理论时需要考虑文化背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
86
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Nordic Journal of Psychiatry publishes international research on all areas of psychiatry. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry is the official journal for the eight psychiatry associations in the Nordic and Baltic countries. The journal aims to provide a leading international forum for high quality research on all themes of psychiatry including: Child psychiatry Adult psychiatry Psychotherapy Pharmacotherapy Social psychiatry Psychosomatic medicine Nordic Journal of Psychiatry accepts original research articles, review articles, brief reports, editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信