Model-Fitting Weighted Least Squares as an Alternative to Principal Component Analysis for Analyzing Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy Spectrum Images.
IF 2.9 4区 工程技术Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"Model-Fitting Weighted Least Squares as an Alternative to Principal Component Analysis for Analyzing Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy Spectrum Images.","authors":"David Wahlqvist, Martin Ek","doi":"10.1093/mam/ozae106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spectrum imaging with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) has become ubiquitous in material characterization using electron microscopy. Multivariate statistical methods, commonly principal component analysis (PCA), are often used to aid analysis of the resulting multidimensional datasets; PCA can provide denoising prior to further analysis or grouping of pixels into distinct phases with similar signals. However, it is well known that PCA can introduce artifacts at low signal-to-noise ratios. Unfortunately, when evaluating the benefits and risks with PCA, it is often compared only against raw data, where it tends to shine; alternative data analysis methods providing a fair point of comparison are often lacking. Here, we directly compare PCA with a strategy based on (the conceptually and computationally simpler) weighted least squares (WLS). We show that for four representative cases, model fitting of the sum spectrum followed by WLS (mfWLS) consistently outperforms PCA in terms of finding and accurately describing compositional gradients and inclusions and as a preprocessing step to clustering. Additionally, we demonstrate that some common artifacts and biases displayed by PCA are avoided with the mfWLS approach. In summary, mfWLS can provide a superior option to PCA for analysis of EDS spectrum images as the signal is simply and accurately modeled.</p>","PeriodicalId":18625,"journal":{"name":"Microscopy and Microanalysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microscopy and Microanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mam/ozae106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Spectrum imaging with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) has become ubiquitous in material characterization using electron microscopy. Multivariate statistical methods, commonly principal component analysis (PCA), are often used to aid analysis of the resulting multidimensional datasets; PCA can provide denoising prior to further analysis or grouping of pixels into distinct phases with similar signals. However, it is well known that PCA can introduce artifacts at low signal-to-noise ratios. Unfortunately, when evaluating the benefits and risks with PCA, it is often compared only against raw data, where it tends to shine; alternative data analysis methods providing a fair point of comparison are often lacking. Here, we directly compare PCA with a strategy based on (the conceptually and computationally simpler) weighted least squares (WLS). We show that for four representative cases, model fitting of the sum spectrum followed by WLS (mfWLS) consistently outperforms PCA in terms of finding and accurately describing compositional gradients and inclusions and as a preprocessing step to clustering. Additionally, we demonstrate that some common artifacts and biases displayed by PCA are avoided with the mfWLS approach. In summary, mfWLS can provide a superior option to PCA for analysis of EDS spectrum images as the signal is simply and accurately modeled.
期刊介绍:
Microscopy and Microanalysis publishes original research papers in the fields of microscopy, imaging, and compositional analysis. This distinguished international forum is intended for microscopists in both biology and materials science. The journal provides significant articles that describe new and existing techniques and instrumentation, as well as the applications of these to the imaging and analysis of microstructure. Microscopy and Microanalysis also includes review articles, letters to the editor, and book reviews.