The causal relationship between diabetes mellitus and the risk of sensorineural hearing loss: A Mendelian randomization study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Qingqing Guo, Dingren Niu, Ling Zhou
{"title":"The causal relationship between diabetes mellitus and the risk of sensorineural hearing loss: A Mendelian randomization study.","authors":"Qingqing Guo, Dingren Niu, Ling Zhou","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000039950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An increasing body of evidence suggests that diabetes mellitus (DM) plays a role in sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). However, the specific causal relationship between DM and SNHL remains partially uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the causal relationship between DM and the risk of SNHL using a Mendelian randomization (MR) study. Single nucleotide polymorphisms closely related to DM were selected as instrumental variables using open genome-wide association study datasets. Three methods based on inverse variance weighted were utilized to investigate the causal relationship between DM and SNHL. Subsequently, multivariable MR (MVMR) was executed to adjust for confounding genetic associations. In addition, a range of sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the stability and reliability of the MR results. The inverse variance weighted analysis indicated a potential genetic causality between DM and SNHL (odds ratio [OR]: 2.179; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.123-4.231; P = .021). The sensitivity analyses showed that the included single nucleotide polymorphisms had no heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy, and outliers (P > .05). Moreover, the leave-one-out method further verified the robustness of the MR analysis results. Finally, the results of the MVMR study predicted that there was a genetic causal relationship between type 1 DM and SNHL (OR: 1.032; 95%CI: 1.018-1.047; P = 5.45 × 10-6), while there was no causality between type 2 DM and SNHL (OR: 1.000; 95%CI: 0.958-1.036; P = .853). Our study suggested that DM and type 1 DM may be genetically responsible for SNHL. Although our study did not detect a genetic causal relationship between type 2 DM and SNHL, this does not rule out a relationship between them at other mechanistic levels. Further studies are required to confirm the findings and look into the physiological and pathological mechanism underlying these relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"103 45","pages":"e39950"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11557036/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000039950","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An increasing body of evidence suggests that diabetes mellitus (DM) plays a role in sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). However, the specific causal relationship between DM and SNHL remains partially uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the causal relationship between DM and the risk of SNHL using a Mendelian randomization (MR) study. Single nucleotide polymorphisms closely related to DM were selected as instrumental variables using open genome-wide association study datasets. Three methods based on inverse variance weighted were utilized to investigate the causal relationship between DM and SNHL. Subsequently, multivariable MR (MVMR) was executed to adjust for confounding genetic associations. In addition, a range of sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the stability and reliability of the MR results. The inverse variance weighted analysis indicated a potential genetic causality between DM and SNHL (odds ratio [OR]: 2.179; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.123-4.231; P = .021). The sensitivity analyses showed that the included single nucleotide polymorphisms had no heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy, and outliers (P > .05). Moreover, the leave-one-out method further verified the robustness of the MR analysis results. Finally, the results of the MVMR study predicted that there was a genetic causal relationship between type 1 DM and SNHL (OR: 1.032; 95%CI: 1.018-1.047; P = 5.45 × 10-6), while there was no causality between type 2 DM and SNHL (OR: 1.000; 95%CI: 0.958-1.036; P = .853). Our study suggested that DM and type 1 DM may be genetically responsible for SNHL. Although our study did not detect a genetic causal relationship between type 2 DM and SNHL, this does not rule out a relationship between them at other mechanistic levels. Further studies are required to confirm the findings and look into the physiological and pathological mechanism underlying these relationships.

糖尿病与感音神经性听力损失风险之间的因果关系:孟德尔随机研究
越来越多的证据表明,糖尿病(DM)是导致感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)的原因之一。然而,糖尿病与感音神经性听力损失之间的具体因果关系仍存在部分不确定性。本研究旨在通过孟德尔随机化(MR)研究来探讨 DM 与 SNHL 风险之间的因果关系。利用开放的全基因组关联研究数据集,选择与 DM 密切相关的单核苷酸多态性作为工具变量。利用三种基于反方差加权的方法来研究 DM 与 SNHL 之间的因果关系。随后,执行了多变量 MR(MVMR)以调整混杂的遗传关联。此外,还进行了一系列敏感性分析,以评估 MR 结果的稳定性和可靠性。逆方差加权分析表明,DM 和 SNHL 之间存在潜在的遗传因果关系(几率比 [OR]:2.179;95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.123-4.231;P = .021)。敏感性分析表明,纳入的单核苷酸多态性不存在异质性、水平多态性和异常值(P > .05)。此外,剔除法进一步验证了 MR 分析结果的稳健性。最后,MVMR 研究结果预测 1 型 DM 与 SNHL 之间存在遗传因果关系(OR:1.032;95%CI:1.018-1.047;P = 5.45 × 10-6),而 2 型 DM 与 SNHL 之间不存在因果关系(OR:1.000;95%CI:0.958-1.036;P = .853)。我们的研究表明,DM和1型DM可能是导致SNHL的遗传因素。虽然我们的研究没有发现2型糖尿病和SNHL之间存在遗传因果关系,但这并不排除它们之间在其他机制层面上的关系。还需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现,并探究这些关系背后的生理和病理机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信