Comparing Safety Profiles of Skin-Sparing and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Retrospective Analysis

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Microsurgery Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1002/micr.31256
Madeleine M. Blazel, Joseph D. Quick, Rachel E. Schafer, Priya Shukla, Shannon S. Wu, Steven Bernard, Graham Schwarz, Risal Djohan, Raffi Gurunian, Sarah N. Bishop
{"title":"Comparing Safety Profiles of Skin-Sparing and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Retrospective Analysis","authors":"Madeleine M. Blazel,&nbsp;Joseph D. Quick,&nbsp;Rachel E. Schafer,&nbsp;Priya Shukla,&nbsp;Shannon S. Wu,&nbsp;Steven Bernard,&nbsp;Graham Schwarz,&nbsp;Risal Djohan,&nbsp;Raffi Gurunian,&nbsp;Sarah N. Bishop","doi":"10.1002/micr.31256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Mastectomy is performed prior to or concurrently with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. However, the complication rates of nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) versus skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with DIEP are not well-characterized.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective study included patients who underwent SSM or NSM with DIEP reconstruction between January 2019 and July 2022 at an academic institution. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative complication rate. Variables were compared using Student's <i>t</i>-tests/Wilcoxon rank-sum and Chi-square/Fisher's exact tests.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 535 patients, 195 (36%) underwent NSM and 340 (64%) underwent SSM. The 30-day postoperative complication rates did not differ between cohorts (16.4% in NSM vs. 16.8% in SSM, <i>p</i> &gt; 0.9). The NSM cohort had a higher rate of any flap necrosis (9.2% vs. 3.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.01) compared to the SSM cohort, though rates of total DIEP flap loss rate did not differ (4.1% vs. 1.5% respectively). Site-wide total DIEP flap loss was 2.4%. The NSM cohort had smaller preoperative sternal notch-to-nipple distances (25.0 vs. 26.5 cm, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and had lower rates of preoperative radiation therapy (28.2% vs. 42.9%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.002) compared to the SSM cohort. The cohorts did not differ in demographic or operative variables including reconstruction timing (delayed vs. immediate interval), readmission, and reoperation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Individuals who received an NSM prior to DIEP reconstruction had more flap complications compared to the SSM cohort. Both cohorts had comparable overall 30-day postoperative complication rates and demographic variables, and rate of total DIEP flap loss was 2.4%. Patient preference can further guide surgical decision-making.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":"44 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/micr.31256","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/micr.31256","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Mastectomy is performed prior to or concurrently with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. However, the complication rates of nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) versus skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with DIEP are not well-characterized.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients who underwent SSM or NSM with DIEP reconstruction between January 2019 and July 2022 at an academic institution. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative complication rate. Variables were compared using Student's t-tests/Wilcoxon rank-sum and Chi-square/Fisher's exact tests.

Results

Of 535 patients, 195 (36%) underwent NSM and 340 (64%) underwent SSM. The 30-day postoperative complication rates did not differ between cohorts (16.4% in NSM vs. 16.8% in SSM, p > 0.9). The NSM cohort had a higher rate of any flap necrosis (9.2% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.01) compared to the SSM cohort, though rates of total DIEP flap loss rate did not differ (4.1% vs. 1.5% respectively). Site-wide total DIEP flap loss was 2.4%. The NSM cohort had smaller preoperative sternal notch-to-nipple distances (25.0 vs. 26.5 cm, p < 0.001) and had lower rates of preoperative radiation therapy (28.2% vs. 42.9%, p < 0.002) compared to the SSM cohort. The cohorts did not differ in demographic or operative variables including reconstruction timing (delayed vs. immediate interval), readmission, and reoperation.

Conclusions

Individuals who received an NSM prior to DIEP reconstruction had more flap complications compared to the SSM cohort. Both cohorts had comparable overall 30-day postoperative complication rates and demographic variables, and rate of total DIEP flap loss was 2.4%. Patient preference can further guide surgical decision-making.

比较带深层上腹部穿孔器瓣乳房重建术的切皮乳房切除术和乳头切开乳房切除术的安全性:回顾性分析
背景:乳房切除术是在下腹穿孔器(DIEP)皮瓣乳房重建术之前或同时进行的。然而,乳头保留乳房切除术(NSM)与带 DIEP 的皮肤保留乳房切除术(SSM)的并发症发生率尚未得到很好的描述:这项回顾性研究纳入了2019年1月至2022年7月期间在一家学术机构接受SSM或NSM与DIEP重建术的患者。主要结果是术后30天并发症发生率。变量比较采用学生 t 检验/Wilcoxon 秩和检验和 Chi-square 检验/Fisher's 精确检验:在535名患者中,195人(36%)接受了NSM手术,340人(64%)接受了SSM手术。两组患者术后30天的并发症发生率没有差异(NSM为16.4%,SSM为16.8%,P > 0.9)。与SSM队列相比,NSM队列的皮瓣坏死率更高(9.2% vs. 3.5%,p = 0.01),但DIEP皮瓣总脱落率没有差异(分别为4.1% vs. 1.5%)。整个部位的 DIEP 皮瓣总脱落率为 2.4%。NSM队列的术前胸骨切迹到乳头的距离较小(25.0 cm vs. 26.5 cm,p 结论:NSM队列的术前胸骨切迹到乳头的距离较小,p 结论:NSM队列的术前胸骨切迹到乳头的距离较小:与SSM队列相比,在DIEP重建前接受NSM的患者有更多的皮瓣并发症。两组患者术后30天的总体并发症发生率和人口统计学变量相当,DIEP皮瓣总脱落率为2.4%。患者的偏好可进一步指导手术决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microsurgery
Microsurgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Microsurgery is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning surgery under microscopic magnification. Microsurgery publishes clinical studies, research papers, invited articles, relevant reviews, and other scholarly works from all related fields including orthopaedic surgery, otolaryngology, pediatric surgery, plastic surgery, urology, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信