Clinical and demographic factors linked to low-value emergency department visits in pediatric patients with spina bifida.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Peter Y Cai, Erin R McNamara, Hatim Thaker, Carlos R Estrada, Hsin-Hsiao S Wang
{"title":"Clinical and demographic factors linked to low-value emergency department visits in pediatric patients with spina bifida.","authors":"Peter Y Cai, Erin R McNamara, Hatim Thaker, Carlos R Estrada, Hsin-Hsiao S Wang","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Identifying factors associated with emergency visits that could be delivered at lower-cost sites may help guide population health strategies for pediatric patients with spina bifida.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Emergency department encounters (2016-2023) by patients with spina bifida (< 18-years-old) in Pediatric Health Information System were identified. Absence of clinical and imaging charges was defined as low-value emergency visit. We utilized a control population of patients (<18-years-old) with obstructive/reflux uropathy who presented for emergency department encounters (2016-2023). Mixed effects (with repeated individual measurements as random effect) logistic regression was fitted to model odds of low-value emergency visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, we included 22,672 emergency visits by patients with spina bifida. 20.7% of these emergency visits were low-value versus 17.7% in controls (p<0.001). Costs related to low-value emergency visits account for 3.8% of all costs for emergency visit-related encounters in patients with spina bifida. Low-value emergency visits were associated with younger age [OR 1.05 (1.04 - 1.06) per year younger], Hispanic/Latino [OR 1.21 (1.06 - 1.39) compared to non-Hispanics], black [OR 1.35 (1.16 - 1.58) compared to white], public insurance [OR 1.14 (1.01 - 1.29) compared to private insurance], and genitourinary encounter diagnosis [OR 1.16 (1.04 - 1.30)]. Using a standard patient, we found that the odds of low-value emergency visit across hospitals ranged from 0.31 to 5.36.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Younger age, Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, black and other race, public insurance, and genitourinary encounter diagnosis were associated with higher odds for low-value emergency visits in pediatric patients with spina bifida. There was wide variation across hospitals that warrants further investigation to elucidate best practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"101097JU0000000000004329"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004329","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Identifying factors associated with emergency visits that could be delivered at lower-cost sites may help guide population health strategies for pediatric patients with spina bifida.

Materials and methods: Emergency department encounters (2016-2023) by patients with spina bifida (< 18-years-old) in Pediatric Health Information System were identified. Absence of clinical and imaging charges was defined as low-value emergency visit. We utilized a control population of patients (<18-years-old) with obstructive/reflux uropathy who presented for emergency department encounters (2016-2023). Mixed effects (with repeated individual measurements as random effect) logistic regression was fitted to model odds of low-value emergency visit.

Results: In total, we included 22,672 emergency visits by patients with spina bifida. 20.7% of these emergency visits were low-value versus 17.7% in controls (p<0.001). Costs related to low-value emergency visits account for 3.8% of all costs for emergency visit-related encounters in patients with spina bifida. Low-value emergency visits were associated with younger age [OR 1.05 (1.04 - 1.06) per year younger], Hispanic/Latino [OR 1.21 (1.06 - 1.39) compared to non-Hispanics], black [OR 1.35 (1.16 - 1.58) compared to white], public insurance [OR 1.14 (1.01 - 1.29) compared to private insurance], and genitourinary encounter diagnosis [OR 1.16 (1.04 - 1.30)]. Using a standard patient, we found that the odds of low-value emergency visit across hospitals ranged from 0.31 to 5.36.

Conclusions: Younger age, Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, black and other race, public insurance, and genitourinary encounter diagnosis were associated with higher odds for low-value emergency visits in pediatric patients with spina bifida. There was wide variation across hospitals that warrants further investigation to elucidate best practices.

与脊柱裂儿科患者低价值急诊就诊有关的临床和人口学因素。
目的:确定可在费用较低的地点提供急诊服务的相关因素,有助于指导脊柱裂儿科患者的人口健康策略:对儿科健康信息系统中脊柱裂患者(小于 18 岁)的急诊就诊情况(2016-2023 年)进行了识别。没有临床和影像学费用被定义为低价值急诊就诊。我们利用了患者对照人群(结果:共有 22,660 名脊柱裂患者接受了急诊治疗):我们总共收录了 22,672 例脊柱裂患者的急诊。其中 20.7% 的急诊就诊为低值就诊,而对照组的这一比例为 17.7%(P 结论:脊柱裂患者的年龄较小、西班牙裔和拉丁裔比例较高:年龄较小、西班牙裔/拉美裔、黑人和其他种族、公共保险以及泌尿生殖系统疾病诊断与脊柱裂儿科患者低价值急诊就诊几率较高有关。不同医院之间的差异很大,需要进一步调查以阐明最佳实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Urology
Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
7.60%
发文量
3746
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the American Urological Association (AUA), and the most widely read and highly cited journal in the field, The Journal of Urology® brings solid coverage of the clinically relevant content needed to stay at the forefront of the dynamic field of urology. This premier journal presents investigative studies on critical areas of research and practice, survey articles providing short condensations of the best and most important urology literature worldwide, and practice-oriented reports on significant clinical observations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信