Reproducibility of liver ADC measurements using first moment optimized diffusion imaging.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Timothy J Allen, Rianne A van der Heijden, Gregory Simchick, Diego Hernando
{"title":"Reproducibility of liver ADC measurements using first moment optimized diffusion imaging.","authors":"Timothy J Allen, Rianne A van der Heijden, Gregory Simchick, Diego Hernando","doi":"10.1002/mrm.30372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cardiac-induced liver motion can bias liver ADC measurements and compromise reproducibility. The purpose of this work was to enable motion-robust DWI on multiple MR scanners and assess reproducibility of the resulting liver ADC measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First moment-optimized diffusion imaging (MODI) was implemented on three MR scanners with various gradient performances and field strengths. MODI-DWI and conventional Stejskal-Tanner monopolar (MONO) DWI were acquired in eight (N = 8) healthy volunteers on each scanner, and DWI repetitions were combined using three different averaging methods. For each combination of scanner, acquisition, and averaging method, ADC measurements from each liver segment were collected. Systematic differences in ADC values between scanners and methods were assessed with linear mixed effects modeling, and reproducibility was quantified via reproducibility coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MODI reduced left-right liver lobe ADC bias from 0.43 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s (MONO) to 0.19 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s (MODI) when simple (unweighted) repetition averaging was used. The bias was reduced from 0.23 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s to 0.06 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s using weighted averaging, and 0.14 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s to 0.01 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s using squared weighted averaging. There was no significant difference in ADC measurements between field strengths or scanner gradient performance. MODI improved reproducibility coefficients compared to MONO: 0.84 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s vs. 0.63 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s (MODI vs. MONO) for simple averaging, 0.66 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s vs. 0.50 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s for weighted averaging, and 0.61 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s vs. 0.47 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s for squared weighted averaging.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The feasibility of motion-robust liver DWI using MODI was demonstrated on multiple MR scanners. MODI improved interlobar agreement and reproducibility of ADC measurements in a healthy cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":18065,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30372","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Cardiac-induced liver motion can bias liver ADC measurements and compromise reproducibility. The purpose of this work was to enable motion-robust DWI on multiple MR scanners and assess reproducibility of the resulting liver ADC measurements.

Methods: First moment-optimized diffusion imaging (MODI) was implemented on three MR scanners with various gradient performances and field strengths. MODI-DWI and conventional Stejskal-Tanner monopolar (MONO) DWI were acquired in eight (N = 8) healthy volunteers on each scanner, and DWI repetitions were combined using three different averaging methods. For each combination of scanner, acquisition, and averaging method, ADC measurements from each liver segment were collected. Systematic differences in ADC values between scanners and methods were assessed with linear mixed effects modeling, and reproducibility was quantified via reproducibility coefficients.

Results: MODI reduced left-right liver lobe ADC bias from 0.43 × 10-3 mm2/s (MONO) to 0.19 × 10-3 mm2/s (MODI) when simple (unweighted) repetition averaging was used. The bias was reduced from 0.23 × 10-3 mm2/s to 0.06 × 10-3 mm2/s using weighted averaging, and 0.14 × 10-3 mm2/s to 0.01 × 10-3 mm2/s using squared weighted averaging. There was no significant difference in ADC measurements between field strengths or scanner gradient performance. MODI improved reproducibility coefficients compared to MONO: 0.84 × 10-3 mm2/s vs. 0.63 × 10-3 mm2/s (MODI vs. MONO) for simple averaging, 0.66 × 10-3 mm2/s vs. 0.50 × 10-3 mm2/s for weighted averaging, and 0.61 × 10-3 mm2/s vs. 0.47 × 10-3 mm2/s for squared weighted averaging.

Conclusion: The feasibility of motion-robust liver DWI using MODI was demonstrated on multiple MR scanners. MODI improved interlobar agreement and reproducibility of ADC measurements in a healthy cohort.

利用第一矩优化扩散成像测量肝脏 ADC 的再现性。
目的:心脏引起的肝脏运动会使肝脏 ADC 测量产生偏差并影响再现性。这项工作的目的是在多台磁共振扫描仪上实现无运动的 DWI,并评估由此获得的肝脏 ADC 测量结果的重现性:方法:首先在三台具有不同梯度性能和场强的磁共振扫描仪上实施了瞬间优化扩散成像(MODI)。MODI-DWI 和传统的 Stejskal-Tanner 单极(MONO)DWI 在每台扫描仪上对八名(N = 8)健康志愿者进行了采集,并使用三种不同的平均方法合并了 DWI 重复。对于每种扫描仪、采集和平均方法的组合,都收集了每个肝段的 ADC 测量值。通过线性混合效应建模评估不同扫描仪和方法之间 ADC 值的系统性差异,并通过再现性系数量化再现性:结果:当使用简单(非加权)重复平均时,MODI 将左右肝叶 ADC 偏差从 0.43 × 10-3 mm2/s(MONO)降低到 0.19 × 10-3 mm2/s(MODI)。使用加权平均时,偏差从 0.23 × 10-3 mm2/s 降至 0.06 × 10-3 mm2/s;使用平方加权平均时,偏差从 0.14 × 10-3 mm2/s 降至 0.01 × 10-3 mm2/s。不同场强或扫描仪梯度性能之间的 ADC 测量结果没有明显差异。与 MONO 相比,MODI 提高了重现性系数:简单平均为 0.84 × 10-3 mm2/s 对 0.63 × 10-3 mm2/s(MODI 对 MONO),加权平均为 0.66 × 10-3 mm2/s 对 0.50 × 10-3 mm2/s,平方加权平均为 0.61 × 10-3 mm2/s 对 0.47 × 10-3 mm2/s:结论:使用 MODI 在多台磁共振扫描仪上进行运动抑制肝脏 DWI 的可行性已得到证实。MODI 改善了健康人群中 ADC 测量的叶间一致性和可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
24.20%
发文量
376
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Magn Reson Med) is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations concerned with all aspects of the development and use of nuclear magnetic resonance and electron paramagnetic resonance techniques for medical applications. Reports of original investigations in the areas of mathematics, computing, engineering, physics, biophysics, chemistry, biochemistry, and physiology directly relevant to magnetic resonance will be accepted, as well as methodology-oriented clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信