Lauren Zeitlinger, George M Chavez, Morgan Darrow, Robert J Canter, R Lor Randall, Steven W Thorpe
{"title":"Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Member Survey: Intra-Operative Peripheral Margins in Soft Tissue Sarcoma.","authors":"Lauren Zeitlinger, George M Chavez, Morgan Darrow, Robert J Canter, R Lor Randall, Steven W Thorpe","doi":"10.1002/jso.27936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Routine intraoperative peripheral margin sampling is often employed by musculoskeletal surgical oncologists. Several recommendations exist regarding this practice pattern. It is unknown what the practice patterns of Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) members are. Evidence-based data to support or refute this practice is currently lacking. We developed an anonymous survey with two primary objectives. To determine the practice patterns of active MSTS members with respect to intraoperative peripheral margin sampling and to elucidate the most common rationale for routine sampling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous survey was distributed through the MSTS to 320 active members. Results were collected with a branching logic fashion via Microsoft Forms®.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surveys were sent to 320 MSTS members in 2021. A total of 108 responses were collected. A total of 55 (51%) respondents noted that they routinely send intraoperative peripheral margins. Primary reasons for margin assessment included concerns about adequacy of margins. Members who routinely send frozen margins sent on average 4-6 specimens.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is significant variability in this practice amongst MSTS members. Given there is no evidence to support or refute this practice, Further investigation is required to determine the clinical utility of routine intraoperative peripheral margin sampling.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27936","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Routine intraoperative peripheral margin sampling is often employed by musculoskeletal surgical oncologists. Several recommendations exist regarding this practice pattern. It is unknown what the practice patterns of Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) members are. Evidence-based data to support or refute this practice is currently lacking. We developed an anonymous survey with two primary objectives. To determine the practice patterns of active MSTS members with respect to intraoperative peripheral margin sampling and to elucidate the most common rationale for routine sampling.
Methods: An anonymous survey was distributed through the MSTS to 320 active members. Results were collected with a branching logic fashion via Microsoft Forms®.
Results: Surveys were sent to 320 MSTS members in 2021. A total of 108 responses were collected. A total of 55 (51%) respondents noted that they routinely send intraoperative peripheral margins. Primary reasons for margin assessment included concerns about adequacy of margins. Members who routinely send frozen margins sent on average 4-6 specimens.
Conclusions: There is significant variability in this practice amongst MSTS members. Given there is no evidence to support or refute this practice, Further investigation is required to determine the clinical utility of routine intraoperative peripheral margin sampling.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.