Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Member Survey: Intra-Operative Peripheral Margins in Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Lauren Zeitlinger, George M Chavez, Morgan Darrow, Robert J Canter, R Lor Randall, Steven W Thorpe
{"title":"Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Member Survey: Intra-Operative Peripheral Margins in Soft Tissue Sarcoma.","authors":"Lauren Zeitlinger, George M Chavez, Morgan Darrow, Robert J Canter, R Lor Randall, Steven W Thorpe","doi":"10.1002/jso.27936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Routine intraoperative peripheral margin sampling is often employed by musculoskeletal surgical oncologists. Several recommendations exist regarding this practice pattern. It is unknown what the practice patterns of Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) members are. Evidence-based data to support or refute this practice is currently lacking. We developed an anonymous survey with two primary objectives. To determine the practice patterns of active MSTS members with respect to intraoperative peripheral margin sampling and to elucidate the most common rationale for routine sampling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous survey was distributed through the MSTS to 320 active members. Results were collected with a branching logic fashion via Microsoft Forms®.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surveys were sent to 320 MSTS members in 2021. A total of 108 responses were collected. A total of 55 (51%) respondents noted that they routinely send intraoperative peripheral margins. Primary reasons for margin assessment included concerns about adequacy of margins. Members who routinely send frozen margins sent on average 4-6 specimens.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is significant variability in this practice amongst MSTS members. Given there is no evidence to support or refute this practice, Further investigation is required to determine the clinical utility of routine intraoperative peripheral margin sampling.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27936","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Routine intraoperative peripheral margin sampling is often employed by musculoskeletal surgical oncologists. Several recommendations exist regarding this practice pattern. It is unknown what the practice patterns of Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) members are. Evidence-based data to support or refute this practice is currently lacking. We developed an anonymous survey with two primary objectives. To determine the practice patterns of active MSTS members with respect to intraoperative peripheral margin sampling and to elucidate the most common rationale for routine sampling.

Methods: An anonymous survey was distributed through the MSTS to 320 active members. Results were collected with a branching logic fashion via Microsoft Forms®.

Results: Surveys were sent to 320 MSTS members in 2021. A total of 108 responses were collected. A total of 55 (51%) respondents noted that they routinely send intraoperative peripheral margins. Primary reasons for margin assessment included concerns about adequacy of margins. Members who routinely send frozen margins sent on average 4-6 specimens.

Conclusions: There is significant variability in this practice amongst MSTS members. Given there is no evidence to support or refute this practice, Further investigation is required to determine the clinical utility of routine intraoperative peripheral margin sampling.

肌肉骨骼肿瘤协会会员调查:软组织肉瘤的术中周边边缘。
背景和目的:肌肉骨骼肿瘤外科医生经常采用常规术中外周边缘取样。关于这种实践模式有几种建议。目前尚不清楚肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会 (MSTS) 会员的实践模式。目前还缺乏支持或反驳这种做法的循证数据。我们制定了一项匿名调查,主要目的有两个。确定活跃的 MSTS 会员在术中外周边缘取样方面的实践模式,并阐明常规取样的最常见理由:方法:通过 MSTS 向 320 名活跃会员发放匿名调查问卷。方法: 通过 MSTS 向 320 名活跃会员发放匿名调查问卷,并通过 Microsoft Forms® 以分支逻辑方式收集结果:2021 年向 320 名 MSTS 会员发送了调查问卷。共收集到 108 份回复。共有 55 位(51%)受访者指出,他们会定期发送术中周边边缘。边缘评估的主要原因包括对边缘是否充分的担忧。例行送检冷冻切缘的成员平均送检 4-6 份标本:结论:MSTS 成员在这一做法上存在很大差异。鉴于没有证据支持或反驳这种做法,需要进一步调查以确定术中常规边缘取样的临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信