Concurrent oculomotor hyperactivity and deficient anti-saccade performance in obsessive-compulsive disorder

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Zhenni Wang , Chen Zhang , Qihui Guo , Qing Fan , Lihui Wang
{"title":"Concurrent oculomotor hyperactivity and deficient anti-saccade performance in obsessive-compulsive disorder","authors":"Zhenni Wang ,&nbsp;Chen Zhang ,&nbsp;Qihui Guo ,&nbsp;Qing Fan ,&nbsp;Lihui Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.11.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Existing studies mainly focused on the inhibition of the task-interfering response to understand the inhibitory deficits of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, recent studies suggested that inhibitory function is broadly involved in response preparation and implementation. It is yet unknown if the inhibition dysfunction in OCD extends beyond the task-interfering response to the general inhibitory function. Here we address this issue based on the multidimensional eye-movement measurements, which can better capture the inhibitory deficits than manual responses. Thirty-one OCD patients and 32 healthy controls (HCs) completed the anti-saccade task where multidimensional eye-movement features were developed. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) suggested two components of inhibitory function that negatively correlated with each other: one component of oculomotor hyperactivity in generating oculomotor output which is characterized with early premature saccades, early cross rates and saccade number; the other component of task-specific oculomotor efficiency which is characterized with task accuracy, saccade latency, correction rate, and amplitude gain. Importantly, OCD showed both stronger oculomotor hyperactivity and deficient oculomotor efficiency than HCs, and the machine-learning-based classifications showed that the features of oculomotor hyperactivity had higher prediction accuracy than the features of oculomotor efficiency in distinguishing OCD from HCs. Our results suggested that OCD has concurrent deficits in oculomotor hyperactivity and oculomotor efficiency, which may originate from a common inhibitory dysfunction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":"180 ","pages":"Pages 402-410"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395624006332","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing studies mainly focused on the inhibition of the task-interfering response to understand the inhibitory deficits of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, recent studies suggested that inhibitory function is broadly involved in response preparation and implementation. It is yet unknown if the inhibition dysfunction in OCD extends beyond the task-interfering response to the general inhibitory function. Here we address this issue based on the multidimensional eye-movement measurements, which can better capture the inhibitory deficits than manual responses. Thirty-one OCD patients and 32 healthy controls (HCs) completed the anti-saccade task where multidimensional eye-movement features were developed. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) suggested two components of inhibitory function that negatively correlated with each other: one component of oculomotor hyperactivity in generating oculomotor output which is characterized with early premature saccades, early cross rates and saccade number; the other component of task-specific oculomotor efficiency which is characterized with task accuracy, saccade latency, correction rate, and amplitude gain. Importantly, OCD showed both stronger oculomotor hyperactivity and deficient oculomotor efficiency than HCs, and the machine-learning-based classifications showed that the features of oculomotor hyperactivity had higher prediction accuracy than the features of oculomotor efficiency in distinguishing OCD from HCs. Our results suggested that OCD has concurrent deficits in oculomotor hyperactivity and oculomotor efficiency, which may originate from a common inhibitory dysfunction.
强迫症患者同时存在眼球运动过度活跃和反施法表现缺陷。
现有研究主要关注任务干扰反应的抑制,以了解强迫症(OCD)的抑制缺陷。然而,最近的研究表明,抑制功能广泛参与反应的准备和实施。强迫症的抑制功能障碍是否超出了任务干扰反应的范围而扩展到一般抑制功能,目前尚不清楚。与手动反应相比,多维眼动测量能更好地捕捉抑制功能障碍。31名强迫症患者和32名健康对照组(HCs)完成了反闪烁任务,并在此基础上开发了多维眼动特征。确证因子分析(CFA)表明,抑制功能有两个相互负相关的组成部分:一个组成部分是在产生眼球运动输出时的眼球运动亢进,其特征是早期过早囊视、早期交叉率和囊视次数;另一个组成部分是任务特异性眼球运动效率,其特征是任务准确性、囊视延迟、矫正率和振幅增益。重要的是,强迫症患者的眼球运动亢进和眼球运动效率均高于普通人,而基于机器学习的分类结果显示,在区分强迫症和普通人时,眼球运动亢进的预测准确率高于眼球运动效率的预测准确率。我们的研究结果表明,强迫症患者同时存在眼球运动过动症和眼球运动效率障碍,这可能源于一种共同的抑制功能障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of psychiatric research
Journal of psychiatric research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
622
审稿时长
130 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research: (1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors; (2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology; (3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信