{"title":"Trueness and adaptation of screw-retained implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated using 3-dimensional gel deposition.","authors":"Zhe Sun, Yuan Li, Jing Zhao, Yuanna Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Implant-supported monolithic zirconia restorations manufactured using the additive 3-dimensional (3D) gel deposition technique have been introduced. However, studies determining the trueness and adaptation of implant-supported crowns made with the technique are lacking.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the trueness and adaptation of implant-supported zirconia crowns fabricated using additive 3D gel deposition in comparison with zirconia crowns made with the widely used subtractive milling technique.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Crowns were fabricated for wide-diameter titanium implants and wide-neck abutments. Self-glazed zirconia (SGZ) crowns were fabricated using 3D gel deposition (n=10) and from 2 brands of zirconia blanks, Wieland and Upcera, using subtractive milling (WMZ and UMZ, n=10). All crowns were digitalized by a scanner, and then 3D deviation analysis was applied. The trueness was assessed by root mean square (RMS). Marginal and internal adaptations were evaluated using the direct-view technique (DT) and replica technique (RT). The results were analyzed by using the 1-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis statistical tests (α=.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RMS and marginal discrepancy of SGZ exhibited the lowest values among the 3 groups (P<.05), and the 2 types of milled zirconia crowns had comparable RMS and marginal discrepancy values (P>.05). The internal discrepancy values of SGZ were significantly lower than those of WMZ and UMZ in all regions (P<.05). Compared with the WMZ, UMZ showed comparable internal discrepancy values in the axial and axio-occlusal transition regions (P>.05) but had significantly lower internal discrepancy value in the occlusal region (P<.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The adaptation of 3 types of wide-diameter implant-supported zirconia crowns can meet the clinical requirements. Compared with the subtractive milling process, 3D gel deposition produced implant-supported zirconia crowns with improved trueness and adaptation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Statement of problem: Implant-supported monolithic zirconia restorations manufactured using the additive 3-dimensional (3D) gel deposition technique have been introduced. However, studies determining the trueness and adaptation of implant-supported crowns made with the technique are lacking.
Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the trueness and adaptation of implant-supported zirconia crowns fabricated using additive 3D gel deposition in comparison with zirconia crowns made with the widely used subtractive milling technique.
Material and methods: Crowns were fabricated for wide-diameter titanium implants and wide-neck abutments. Self-glazed zirconia (SGZ) crowns were fabricated using 3D gel deposition (n=10) and from 2 brands of zirconia blanks, Wieland and Upcera, using subtractive milling (WMZ and UMZ, n=10). All crowns were digitalized by a scanner, and then 3D deviation analysis was applied. The trueness was assessed by root mean square (RMS). Marginal and internal adaptations were evaluated using the direct-view technique (DT) and replica technique (RT). The results were analyzed by using the 1-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis statistical tests (α=.05).
Results: The RMS and marginal discrepancy of SGZ exhibited the lowest values among the 3 groups (P<.05), and the 2 types of milled zirconia crowns had comparable RMS and marginal discrepancy values (P>.05). The internal discrepancy values of SGZ were significantly lower than those of WMZ and UMZ in all regions (P<.05). Compared with the WMZ, UMZ showed comparable internal discrepancy values in the axial and axio-occlusal transition regions (P>.05) but had significantly lower internal discrepancy value in the occlusal region (P<.05).
Conclusions: The adaptation of 3 types of wide-diameter implant-supported zirconia crowns can meet the clinical requirements. Compared with the subtractive milling process, 3D gel deposition produced implant-supported zirconia crowns with improved trueness and adaptation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.