"I am open to self-belief": A study examining the impact of open-label effects on postexercise affect and postintervention exercise behaviour.

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Journal of Sports Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1080/02640414.2024.2425907
Yue Qiu, Dong-Ting Yun, Jiao Liu, Zhi-Xiong Mao
{"title":"\"I am open to self-belief\": A study examining the impact of open-label effects on postexercise affect and postintervention exercise behaviour.","authors":"Yue Qiu, Dong-Ting Yun, Jiao Liu, Zhi-Xiong Mao","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2024.2425907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The contribution of placebo effects can be measured by manipulating psychological factors, such as positive expectations for exercise outcomes, without the need for traditional placebos (such as inert substances). While placebo effects are well known, research has revealed intriguing findings suggesting that placebos can have beneficial effects even when studies are performed without deception. Open-label placebo (OLP) interventions (prescribed honestly), which harness the power of belief, may represent another effective method for enhancing the benefits of exercise effects. This study compared the efficacy of a conventional placebo intervention, an OLP intervention, and a control group among 89 individuals. Participants' levels of affective response after exercise and exercise behaviour were assessed during the intervention period (4 weeks) and at follow-up (4 weeks). The results revealed similar levels of improvement in all outcomes across the three conditions. Both the conventional placebo and OLP intervention groups exhibited greater enhancements in postexercise enjoyment. OLP interventions demonstrated distinct advantages in terms of remembered affect and expectation fulfilment. Nonetheless, neither intervention directly stimulated postintervention exercise behaviour. Future studies should continue to explore the impact of OLP interventions on adherence to exercise behaviour.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"2172-2182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2024.2425907","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The contribution of placebo effects can be measured by manipulating psychological factors, such as positive expectations for exercise outcomes, without the need for traditional placebos (such as inert substances). While placebo effects are well known, research has revealed intriguing findings suggesting that placebos can have beneficial effects even when studies are performed without deception. Open-label placebo (OLP) interventions (prescribed honestly), which harness the power of belief, may represent another effective method for enhancing the benefits of exercise effects. This study compared the efficacy of a conventional placebo intervention, an OLP intervention, and a control group among 89 individuals. Participants' levels of affective response after exercise and exercise behaviour were assessed during the intervention period (4 weeks) and at follow-up (4 weeks). The results revealed similar levels of improvement in all outcomes across the three conditions. Both the conventional placebo and OLP intervention groups exhibited greater enhancements in postexercise enjoyment. OLP interventions demonstrated distinct advantages in terms of remembered affect and expectation fulfilment. Nonetheless, neither intervention directly stimulated postintervention exercise behaviour. Future studies should continue to explore the impact of OLP interventions on adherence to exercise behaviour.

"我对自我信念持开放态度":一项关于开放标签效应对运动后情绪和干预后运动行为影响的研究。
可以通过操纵心理因素(如对运动结果的积极预期)来衡量安慰剂效应的作用,而无需使用传统的安慰剂(如惰性物质)。虽然安慰剂效应已广为人知,但研究发现,即使在没有欺骗的情况下进行研究,安慰剂也能产生有益的效果。开放标签安慰剂(OLP)干预(诚实地开出处方)利用了信念的力量,可能是增强运动效果益处的另一种有效方法。这项研究比较了传统安慰剂干预、OLP干预和对照组在89人中的效果。在干预期间(4 周)和随访期间(4 周),对参与者运动后的情绪反应水平和运动行为进行了评估。结果显示,三种情况下所有结果的改善程度相似。传统安慰剂组和 OLP 干预组在运动后的愉悦感方面都有更大的提高。OLP 干预在记忆情感和期望实现方面表现出明显的优势。不过,这两种干预都没有直接刺激干预后的运动行为。未来的研究应继续探索OLP干预对坚持锻炼行为的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sports Sciences
Journal of Sports Sciences 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
147
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives. The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信