Body composition-derived abdominal circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio cut-offs for Ethiopian adults in Northwest Ethiopia, 2023.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Mekonnen Assefa, Aster Tsegaye, Adamu Addissie, Alemayehu Worku
{"title":"Body composition-derived abdominal circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio cut-offs for Ethiopian adults in Northwest Ethiopia, 2023.","authors":"Mekonnen Assefa, Aster Tsegaye, Adamu Addissie, Alemayehu Worku","doi":"10.1186/s41043-024-00678-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central and general obesity are commonly measured using tools like waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR). However, the universally recognized cutoffs for these measures may be inadequate for individuals of Ethiopian descent. Due to the lack of universally applicable cutoffs, studies recommend tailoring the optimal screening thresholds to each population's specific characteristics. Therefore, this study aimed to determine body composition-based WC, WHR, and WHtR cutoffs for the healthy adult population of Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A population based cross-sectional study was conducted in the Amhara region of Ethiopia from June to August 2023, collecting anthropometric and body composition data from 838 adult participants. Data were analyzed using Stata, and MedCalc software. The cut-off values were determined using ROC analysis, and performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC), Youden index, sensitivity, and specificity.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The optimal cut-off values for WC, HC, WHR, and WHtR to define obesity in men were 85.0 cm, 93.5 cm, 0.89, and 0.53 respectively. Correspondingly, these values in women were 81.1 cm, 97.2 cm, 0.84, and 0.5. These cutoff values showed the highest effectiveness in defining obesity especially for WC and WHtR. The new proposed cutoff values for waist circumference, hip circumference, and waist-to-height ratio had sensitivity ranging 76-93% and specificity of 83-94% in accurately identifying obesity. The current study also determined the cut-off values for underweight, normal weight, and overweight body weight categories. Accordingly, for men, the WC cut-offs were: ≤ 74.55 cm (underweight), 74.56-78.95 cm (normal), and 79.0-85.0 cm (overweight). For women, the cut-offs were: ≤ 68.25 cm (underweight), 68.26-79.59 cm (normal), and 79.60-81.10 cm (overweight). The WHtR thresholds were: ≤0.43 (underweight), 0.44-0.47 (normal), and 0.48-0.53 (overweight) in men; ≤0.43 (underweight), 0.44-0.50 (normal), and 0.50-0.51 (overweight) in women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings indicate that the WC, WHR, and WHtR cutoff values for defining obesity in Ethiopian adults are lower than international standards. The newly proposed cutoff values showed improved sensitivity and specificity, suggesting their potential diagnostic relevance. Considering these country-specific cutoffs may be beneficial for clinical practice and obesity-related research in Ethiopia.</p>","PeriodicalId":15969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition","volume":"43 1","pages":"185"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562662/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-024-00678-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Central and general obesity are commonly measured using tools like waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR). However, the universally recognized cutoffs for these measures may be inadequate for individuals of Ethiopian descent. Due to the lack of universally applicable cutoffs, studies recommend tailoring the optimal screening thresholds to each population's specific characteristics. Therefore, this study aimed to determine body composition-based WC, WHR, and WHtR cutoffs for the healthy adult population of Ethiopia.

Method: A population based cross-sectional study was conducted in the Amhara region of Ethiopia from June to August 2023, collecting anthropometric and body composition data from 838 adult participants. Data were analyzed using Stata, and MedCalc software. The cut-off values were determined using ROC analysis, and performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC), Youden index, sensitivity, and specificity.

Result: The optimal cut-off values for WC, HC, WHR, and WHtR to define obesity in men were 85.0 cm, 93.5 cm, 0.89, and 0.53 respectively. Correspondingly, these values in women were 81.1 cm, 97.2 cm, 0.84, and 0.5. These cutoff values showed the highest effectiveness in defining obesity especially for WC and WHtR. The new proposed cutoff values for waist circumference, hip circumference, and waist-to-height ratio had sensitivity ranging 76-93% and specificity of 83-94% in accurately identifying obesity. The current study also determined the cut-off values for underweight, normal weight, and overweight body weight categories. Accordingly, for men, the WC cut-offs were: ≤ 74.55 cm (underweight), 74.56-78.95 cm (normal), and 79.0-85.0 cm (overweight). For women, the cut-offs were: ≤ 68.25 cm (underweight), 68.26-79.59 cm (normal), and 79.60-81.10 cm (overweight). The WHtR thresholds were: ≤0.43 (underweight), 0.44-0.47 (normal), and 0.48-0.53 (overweight) in men; ≤0.43 (underweight), 0.44-0.50 (normal), and 0.50-0.51 (overweight) in women.

Conclusion: The findings indicate that the WC, WHR, and WHtR cutoff values for defining obesity in Ethiopian adults are lower than international standards. The newly proposed cutoff values showed improved sensitivity and specificity, suggesting their potential diagnostic relevance. Considering these country-specific cutoffs may be beneficial for clinical practice and obesity-related research in Ethiopia.

2023 年埃塞俄比亚西北部埃塞俄比亚成年人的身体成分衍生腹围、腰臀比和腰高比临界值。
背景:中心性肥胖和全身性肥胖通常使用腰围(WC)、臀围(HC)、腰臀比(WHR)和腰高比(WHTR)等工具进行测量。然而,对于埃塞俄比亚后裔来说,这些普遍认可的测量值可能并不合适。由于缺乏普遍适用的临界值,研究建议根据每个人群的具体特征来定制最佳筛查临界值。因此,本研究旨在为埃塞俄比亚的健康成年人群确定基于身体成分的体重指数、体重减轻指数和体重增加指数的临界值:方法:2023 年 6 月至 8 月在埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉地区开展了一项基于人群的横断面研究,收集了 838 名成年参与者的人体测量和身体成分数据。数据使用 Stata 和 MedCalc 软件进行分析。使用 ROC 分析确定临界值,并使用曲线下面积(AUC)、Youden 指数、灵敏度和特异性评估其性能:结果:界定男性肥胖的最佳截断值(WC、HC、WHR 和 WHtR)分别为 85.0 厘米、93.5 厘米、0.89 和 0.53。相应地,女性的这些数值分别为 81.1 厘米、97.2 厘米、0.84 和 0.5。这些临界值在界定肥胖方面显示出最高的有效性,尤其是在腰围和 WHtR 方面。新提出的腰围、臀围和腰围-身高比的临界值在准确识别肥胖方面的灵敏度为 76%-93%,特异度为 83%-94%。本次研究还确定了体重不足、体重正常和体重超重类别的临界值。因此,男性的体重上限为:≤ 74.55 厘米(体重不足)、74.56-78.95 厘米(正常)和 79.0-85.0 厘米(超重)。女性的临界值为:≤ 68.25 厘米(体重不足)、68.26-79.59 厘米(正常)和 79.60-81.10 厘米(超重)。男性的 WHtR 临界值分别为:≤0.43(体重不足)、0.44-0.47(正常)和 0.48-0.53(超重);女性的 WHtR 临界值分别为:≤0.43(体重不足)、0.44-0.50(正常)和 0.50-0.51(超重):结论:研究结果表明,埃塞俄比亚成年人定义肥胖的 WC、WHR 和 WHtR 临界值低于国际标准。新提出的临界值显示出更高的灵敏度和特异性,表明它们具有潜在的诊断意义。在埃塞俄比亚,考虑这些特定国家的临界值可能对临床实践和肥胖相关研究有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition
Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition brings together research on all aspects of issues related to population, nutrition and health. The journal publishes articles across a broad range of topics including global health, maternal and child health, nutrition, common illnesses and determinants of population health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信