A peer-to-peer infection prevention and control programme in neglected settings: The case of home care and nursing homes in North Italy.

IF 0.9 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Monica Ronco, Bruna Odasmini, Stefania Chiappinotto, Alvisa Palese
{"title":"A peer-to-peer infection prevention and control programme in neglected settings: The case of home care and nursing homes in North Italy.","authors":"Monica Ronco, Bruna Odasmini, Stefania Chiappinotto, Alvisa Palese","doi":"10.1177/17571774241287473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are an increasing concern and educational programmes may increase healthcare professionals' adherence to infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines. However, despite evidence regarding the effectiveness of peer-to-peer educational programmes, to our knowledge, no studies have been conducted in non-hospital settings. A post-intervention pilot study based on peer-to-peer meetings on HAI topics in home care and nursing homes was conducted. A survey was administered to eligible nurses willing to participate, collecting socio-demographic data, the perceived effectiveness and quality of the programme, and the topics for future meetings. Twelve '<i>Pills of Prevention</i>' seminars were held, enrolling 115 nurses and nursing aides. Of the 115 participants, 81 (70.4%) were eligible and 31 (38.2%) completed the survey. Participants found tangible changes in the clinical settings mostly at the individual level, with bundles/checklists delivered during the meetings mostly being used in everyday practice. Regarding the perceived quality, the overall satisfaction with the programme was high due to the opportunity to 'freely share own opinions' and the 'appropriateness of selected topics'. 'Bundles/checklists' were seen as the most interesting topics to prioritize in the future among home care nurses, while HAIs in COVID-19 patients were the least. A community-based peer-to-peer programme, still neglected in terms of HAIs' continuing education strategies, is appreciated and may produce benefits both at the individual and the group level.</p>","PeriodicalId":16094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559432/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17571774241287473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are an increasing concern and educational programmes may increase healthcare professionals' adherence to infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines. However, despite evidence regarding the effectiveness of peer-to-peer educational programmes, to our knowledge, no studies have been conducted in non-hospital settings. A post-intervention pilot study based on peer-to-peer meetings on HAI topics in home care and nursing homes was conducted. A survey was administered to eligible nurses willing to participate, collecting socio-demographic data, the perceived effectiveness and quality of the programme, and the topics for future meetings. Twelve 'Pills of Prevention' seminars were held, enrolling 115 nurses and nursing aides. Of the 115 participants, 81 (70.4%) were eligible and 31 (38.2%) completed the survey. Participants found tangible changes in the clinical settings mostly at the individual level, with bundles/checklists delivered during the meetings mostly being used in everyday practice. Regarding the perceived quality, the overall satisfaction with the programme was high due to the opportunity to 'freely share own opinions' and the 'appropriateness of selected topics'. 'Bundles/checklists' were seen as the most interesting topics to prioritize in the future among home care nurses, while HAIs in COVID-19 patients were the least. A community-based peer-to-peer programme, still neglected in terms of HAIs' continuing education strategies, is appreciated and may produce benefits both at the individual and the group level.

被忽视环境中的点对点感染预防和控制计划:意大利北部的家庭护理和养老院案例。
医疗相关感染(HAIs)日益受到人们的关注,而教育计划可以提高医护人员对感染预防和控制(IPC)指南的遵守程度。然而,尽管有证据表明同侪教育计划是有效的,但据我们所知,还没有在非医院环境中开展过研究。我们开展了一项干预后试点研究,该研究基于家庭护理和养老院中有关 HAI 主题的同行会议。对愿意参与的合格护士进行了调查,收集社会人口学数据、对计划有效性和质量的看法以及未来会议的主题。共举办了 12 场 "预防药丸 "研讨会,有 115 名护士和护理助理参加。在 115 名参与者中,81 人(70.4%)符合条件,31 人(38.2%)完成了调查。与会者发现,临床环境发生了切实的变化,主要体现在个人层面,会议期间提供的捆绑包/清单大多被用于日常实践。在质量感知方面,由于有机会 "自由分享自己的观点 "和 "所选主题的适当性",学员对课程的总体满意度很高。在家庭护理护士中,"捆绑/清单 "被认为是最值得今后优先考虑的主题,而 COVID-19 患者的 HAIs 则是最不值得考虑的主题。以社区为基础的同侪计划在 HAIs 继续教育战略中仍被忽视,但该计划值得赞赏,并可在个人和团体层面产生效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Infection Prevention
Journal of Infection Prevention Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Infection Prevention is the professional publication of the Infection Prevention Society. The aim of the journal is to advance the evidence base in infection prevention and control, and to provide a publishing platform for all health professionals interested in this field of practice. Journal of Infection Prevention is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication containing a wide range of articles: ·Original primary research studies ·Qualitative and quantitative studies ·Reviews of the evidence on various topics ·Practice development project reports ·Guidelines for practice ·Case studies ·Overviews of infectious diseases and their causative organisms ·Audit and surveillance studies/projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信