Incompleteness and Misclassification of Maternal Deaths in Zimbabwe: Data from Two Reproductive Age Mortality Surveys, 2007-2008 and 2018-2019.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Reuben Musarandega, Lennarth Nystrom, Grant Murewanhema, Chipo Gwanzura, Solwayo Ngwenya, Robert Pattinson, Rhoderick Machekano, Stephen Peter Munjanja
{"title":"Incompleteness and Misclassification of Maternal Deaths in Zimbabwe: Data from Two Reproductive Age Mortality Surveys, 2007-2008 and 2018-2019.","authors":"Reuben Musarandega, Lennarth Nystrom, Grant Murewanhema, Chipo Gwanzura, Solwayo Ngwenya, Robert Pattinson, Rhoderick Machekano, Stephen Peter Munjanja","doi":"10.1007/s44197-024-00318-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We implemented two cross-sectional reproductive age mortality surveys in 2007-2008 and 2018-2019 to assess changes in the MMR and causes of death in Zimbabwe. We collected data from health institutions, civil registration and vital statistics, the community, and surveillance. This paper analyses missingness and misclassification of deaths in the two surveys.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared proportions of missed and misclassified deaths in the surveys using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Using log-linear regression models, we calculated and compared risk ratios of missed deaths in the data sources. We assessed the effect on MMRs of misclassifying deaths and analysed the sensitivity and specificity of identifying deaths in the surveys using the six-box method and risk ratios calculated through Binomial exact tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All data sources missed and misclassified the deaths. The community survey was seven times [RR 7.1 (5.1-9.7)] and CRVS three times [RR 3.4 (2.4-4.7)] more likely to identify maternal deaths than health records in 2007-08. In 2018-19, CRVS [RR 0.8 (0.7-0.9)] and surveillance [RR 0.7 (0.6-0.9)] were less likely to identify maternal deaths than health records. Misclassification of causes of death significantly reduced MMRs in health records [RR 1.4 (1.2-1.5)]; CRVS [RR 1.3 (1.1-1.5)] and the community survey/surveillance [RR 1.4 (1.2-1.6)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incompleteness and misclassification of maternal deaths are still high in Zimbabwe. Maternal mortality studies must triangulate data sources to improve the completeness of data while efforts to reduce misclassification of deaths continue.</p>","PeriodicalId":15796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44197-024-00318-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We implemented two cross-sectional reproductive age mortality surveys in 2007-2008 and 2018-2019 to assess changes in the MMR and causes of death in Zimbabwe. We collected data from health institutions, civil registration and vital statistics, the community, and surveillance. This paper analyses missingness and misclassification of deaths in the two surveys.

Methods: We compared proportions of missed and misclassified deaths in the surveys using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Using log-linear regression models, we calculated and compared risk ratios of missed deaths in the data sources. We assessed the effect on MMRs of misclassifying deaths and analysed the sensitivity and specificity of identifying deaths in the surveys using the six-box method and risk ratios calculated through Binomial exact tests.

Results: All data sources missed and misclassified the deaths. The community survey was seven times [RR 7.1 (5.1-9.7)] and CRVS three times [RR 3.4 (2.4-4.7)] more likely to identify maternal deaths than health records in 2007-08. In 2018-19, CRVS [RR 0.8 (0.7-0.9)] and surveillance [RR 0.7 (0.6-0.9)] were less likely to identify maternal deaths than health records. Misclassification of causes of death significantly reduced MMRs in health records [RR 1.4 (1.2-1.5)]; CRVS [RR 1.3 (1.1-1.5)] and the community survey/surveillance [RR 1.4 (1.2-1.6)].

Conclusion: Incompleteness and misclassification of maternal deaths are still high in Zimbabwe. Maternal mortality studies must triangulate data sources to improve the completeness of data while efforts to reduce misclassification of deaths continue.

津巴布韦孕产妇死亡的不完整性和错误分类:来自 2007-2008 年和 2018-2019 年两次育龄期死亡率调查的数据。
导言:我们在 2007-2008 年和 2018-2019 年实施了两次横断面育龄死亡率调查,以评估津巴布韦 MMR 和死亡原因的变化。我们从医疗机构、民事登记和生命统计、社区和监测中收集数据。本文分析了两次调查中死亡的漏报和误报情况:我们使用卡方检验(Chi-square)或费雪精确检验(Fisher's exact)比较了两次调查中漏报和误报死亡人数的比例。利用对数线性回归模型,我们计算并比较了数据源中遗漏死亡的风险比。我们评估了死亡分类错误对 MMR 的影响,并使用六箱法和通过二项式精确检验计算出的风险比分析了调查中识别死亡的灵敏度和特异性:结果:所有数据源都漏报和误报了死亡病例。2007-08 年,社区调查识别孕产妇死亡的可能性是健康记录的七倍[RR 7.1 (5.1-9.7)],CRVS 是三倍[RR 3.4 (2.4-4.7)]。在 2018-19 年,CRVS [RR 0.8 (0.7-0.9)] 和监测 [RR 0.7 (0.6-0.9)] 识别孕产妇死亡的可能性低于健康记录。在健康记录[RR 1.4 (1.2-1.5)]、CRVS[RR 1.3 (1.1-1.5)]和社区调查/监测[RR 1.4 (1.2-1.6)]中,死因分类错误大大降低了孕产妇死亡率:结论:在津巴布韦,孕产妇死亡的不完整性和分类错误率仍然很高。孕产妇死亡率研究必须对数据来源进行三角测量,以提高数据的完整性,同时继续努力减少死亡分类错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
1.40%
发文量
57
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health is an esteemed international publication, offering a platform for peer-reviewed articles that drive advancements in global epidemiology and international health. Our mission is to shape global health policy by showcasing cutting-edge scholarship and innovative strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信