Predicting blood pressure response to renal denervation based on a new approach.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Venera Bytyqi, Dennis Kannenkeril, Kristina Striepe, Agnes Bosch, Marina V Karg, Axel Schmid, Mario Schiffer, Michael Uder, Roland E Schmieder
{"title":"Predicting blood pressure response to renal denervation based on a new approach.","authors":"Venera Bytyqi, Dennis Kannenkeril, Kristina Striepe, Agnes Bosch, Marina V Karg, Axel Schmid, Mario Schiffer, Michael Uder, Roland E Schmieder","doi":"10.1097/HJH.0000000000003918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying predictors of blood pressure (BP) response to renal denervation (RDN) is crucial for patient selection. According to Wilder's principle, baseline BP predicts BP change after any antihypertensive intervention. Thus, any observed BP change after RDN is the sum of the BP change depending on the baseline BP and the specific BP reduction due to RDN. Based on this concept, we propose a new definition of BP responders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In our center, 148 patients with uncontrolled hypertension underwent RDN, and 24-h ambulatory BP (ABP) was measured at baseline, and 6 months after the procedure. The decrease in 24-h systolic BP (SBP) correlated with baseline SBP (P = <0.001, r = -0.374). We determined the RDN-specific effect by subtracting the predicted SBP decrease from the observed SBP decrease. The cohort was divided into RDN responders, neutral responders, and nonresponders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study population had a mean age of 59 ± 10.4 years and was 74% male. The RDN-specific (residual) 24-h ABP decreased by -14.9 ± 6.3/-8.2 ± 3.8 mmHg (responder group), 1.0 ± 3.2/0.2 ± 1.9 mmHg (neutral group), and 14.2 ± 10.4/8.3 ± 3.9 mmHg (nonresponder group) 6 months after RDN. Responders had fewer antihypertensive medications (P = 0.018), higher baseline office heart rate (HR) (P = 0.019), higher 24-h ambulatory HR (P = 0.003), lower BMI (P < 0.038), and absence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) (P = 0.020).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our definition of BP responders to RDN separates baseline BP-related changes from RDN-specific changes. Positive predictors for BP response to RDN include low BMI, fewer antihypertensive medications, high baseline office HR, high 24-h ambulatory HR, and absence of T2D.</p>","PeriodicalId":16043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000003918","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Identifying predictors of blood pressure (BP) response to renal denervation (RDN) is crucial for patient selection. According to Wilder's principle, baseline BP predicts BP change after any antihypertensive intervention. Thus, any observed BP change after RDN is the sum of the BP change depending on the baseline BP and the specific BP reduction due to RDN. Based on this concept, we propose a new definition of BP responders.

Methods: In our center, 148 patients with uncontrolled hypertension underwent RDN, and 24-h ambulatory BP (ABP) was measured at baseline, and 6 months after the procedure. The decrease in 24-h systolic BP (SBP) correlated with baseline SBP (P = <0.001, r = -0.374). We determined the RDN-specific effect by subtracting the predicted SBP decrease from the observed SBP decrease. The cohort was divided into RDN responders, neutral responders, and nonresponders.

Results: Our study population had a mean age of 59 ± 10.4 years and was 74% male. The RDN-specific (residual) 24-h ABP decreased by -14.9 ± 6.3/-8.2 ± 3.8 mmHg (responder group), 1.0 ± 3.2/0.2 ± 1.9 mmHg (neutral group), and 14.2 ± 10.4/8.3 ± 3.9 mmHg (nonresponder group) 6 months after RDN. Responders had fewer antihypertensive medications (P = 0.018), higher baseline office heart rate (HR) (P = 0.019), higher 24-h ambulatory HR (P = 0.003), lower BMI (P < 0.038), and absence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) (P = 0.020).

Conclusion: Our definition of BP responders to RDN separates baseline BP-related changes from RDN-specific changes. Positive predictors for BP response to RDN include low BMI, fewer antihypertensive medications, high baseline office HR, high 24-h ambulatory HR, and absence of T2D.

基于新方法预测肾脏去神经化的血压反应。
背景:确定血压(BP)对肾脏神经支配(RDN)反应的预测因素对患者的选择至关重要。根据 Wilder 原理,基线血压可预测任何降压干预后的血压变化。因此,RDN 后观察到的任何血压变化都是取决于基线血压和 RDN 导致的特定血压下降的血压变化之和。基于这一概念,我们提出了血压反应者的新定义:在我们的中心,148 名未控制的高血压患者接受了 RDN,并在基线和术后 6 个月测量了 24 小时动态血压(ABP)。24小时收缩压(SBP)的下降与基线SBP相关(P = 结果:研究对象的平均年龄为 59 ± 10.4 岁,74% 为男性。RDN 6 个月后,RDN 特异性(残余)24 小时 ABP 下降了 -14.9 ± 6.3/-8.2 ± 3.8 mmHg(应答组)、1.0 ± 3.2/0.2 ± 1.9 mmHg(中性组)和 14.2 ± 10.4/8.3 ± 3.9 mmHg(非应答组)。有反应者服用的降压药物较少(P = 0.018),基线办公室心率(HR)较高(P = 0.019),24 小时流动心率较高(P = 0.003),体重指数(BMI)较低:我们对 RDN 血压应答者的定义将基线血压相关变化与 RDN 特异性变化区分开来。低体重指数、较少服用抗高血压药物、高基线诊室心率、高 24 小时动态心率和无 T2D 等因素可积极预测 RDN 的血压反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hypertension
Journal of Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1389
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hypertension publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension. The Journal publishes full papers, reviews or editorials (normally by invitation), and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信