Adherence to antihypertensive medications in Omani patients: a comparison of drug biochemical analysis and the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Abdullah Al-Ani, Yousuf Al Suleimani, Sabrina Ritscher, Stefan W Toennes, Amna Al-Hashar, Ibrahim Al-Zakwani, Mohammed Al Za'abi, Khamis Al Hashmi
{"title":"Adherence to antihypertensive medications in Omani patients: a comparison of drug biochemical analysis and the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale.","authors":"Abdullah Al-Ani, Yousuf Al Suleimani, Sabrina Ritscher, Stefan W Toennes, Amna Al-Hashar, Ibrahim Al-Zakwani, Mohammed Al Za'abi, Khamis Al Hashmi","doi":"10.1097/HJH.0000000000003917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medication nonadherence is a major risk factor for suboptimal or failed hypertension pharmacologic therapy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the nonadherence rate to antihypertensive medications using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and the self-reported Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a prospective cross-sectional cohort design. Patients with hypertension aged ≥18 years and prescribed at least one antihypertensive medication were recruited from an outpatient hypertensive clinic at a tertiary healthcare institution in Oman. Adherence was assessed using LC-MS/MS urine analysis and the MMAS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 162 patients completed the MMAS questionnaire and provided urine samples for LC-MS/MS analysis. The overall mean age of the cohort was 55 ± 13 years, and 57% of the patients were men. The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 146 ± 18 mmHg and 79 ± 10 mmHg, respectively. Using the MMAS method, 65% of the patients reported nonadherence. However, LC-MS/MS analysis revealed that only 27% of the patients were nonadherent. The adherent group by LC-MS/MS had significantly lower systolic (P = 0.026) and diastolic blood pressures (P < 0.001) than the nonadherent group, whereas no differences were observed using the MMAS method. There was weak or no agreement between the MMAS and LC-MS/MS results (P = 0.142).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Almost one-fourth of our patients with hypertension were nonadherent to their medications. There was a weak concordance between the MMAS and LC-MS/MS methods in detecting medication nonadherence. Further research into noninvasive convenient adherence scales or methods and their correlations with LC-MS/MS analysis is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000003917","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medication nonadherence is a major risk factor for suboptimal or failed hypertension pharmacologic therapy.

Objective: To determine the nonadherence rate to antihypertensive medications using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and the self-reported Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS).

Methods: This study used a prospective cross-sectional cohort design. Patients with hypertension aged ≥18 years and prescribed at least one antihypertensive medication were recruited from an outpatient hypertensive clinic at a tertiary healthcare institution in Oman. Adherence was assessed using LC-MS/MS urine analysis and the MMAS.

Results: In total, 162 patients completed the MMAS questionnaire and provided urine samples for LC-MS/MS analysis. The overall mean age of the cohort was 55 ± 13 years, and 57% of the patients were men. The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 146 ± 18 mmHg and 79 ± 10 mmHg, respectively. Using the MMAS method, 65% of the patients reported nonadherence. However, LC-MS/MS analysis revealed that only 27% of the patients were nonadherent. The adherent group by LC-MS/MS had significantly lower systolic (P = 0.026) and diastolic blood pressures (P < 0.001) than the nonadherent group, whereas no differences were observed using the MMAS method. There was weak or no agreement between the MMAS and LC-MS/MS results (P = 0.142).

Conclusion: Almost one-fourth of our patients with hypertension were nonadherent to their medications. There was a weak concordance between the MMAS and LC-MS/MS methods in detecting medication nonadherence. Further research into noninvasive convenient adherence scales or methods and their correlations with LC-MS/MS analysis is warranted.

阿曼患者坚持服用降压药的情况:药物生化分析与莫里斯基坚持服药量表的比较。
背景:用药不依从是高血压药物治疗效果不佳或失败的主要风险因素:不坚持用药是高血压药物治疗效果不佳或失败的主要风险因素:使用高效液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)和自我报告的莫里斯基用药依从性量表(MMAS)确定降压药物的不依从率:本研究采用前瞻性横断面队列设计。研究人员从阿曼一家三级医疗机构的高血压门诊中招募了年龄≥18 岁、至少服用一种降压药的高血压患者。采用 LC-MS/MS 尿液分析和 MMAS 对患者的依从性进行评估:共有 162 名患者填写了 MMAS 问卷,并提供了尿液样本用于 LC-MS/MS 分析。总体平均年龄为 55 ± 13 岁,57% 的患者为男性。平均收缩压和舒张压分别为 146 ± 18 mmHg 和 79 ± 10 mmHg。使用 MMAS 方法,65% 的患者表示没有坚持服药。然而,LC-MS/MS 分析显示,只有 27% 的患者未坚持服药。通过 LC-MS/MS 分析,坚持服药组的收缩压(P = 0.026)和舒张压(P 结论:坚持服药组的收缩压和舒张压均明显低于非坚持服药组:近四分之一的高血压患者没有坚持服药。MMAS 和 LC-MS/MS 方法在检测用药不依从性方面的一致性较弱。有必要进一步研究非侵入性方便的依从性量表或方法及其与 LC-MS/MS 分析的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hypertension
Journal of Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1389
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hypertension publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension. The Journal publishes full papers, reviews or editorials (normally by invitation), and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信