Attitudes and Beliefs Regarding Pain and Discrimination Among Black Adults with Sickle Cell Disease: A Mixed Methods Evaluation of an Adapted Chronic Pain Intervention.
Stephanie Howe Guarino, Olusegun Bakare, Carolyn M Jenkins, Kimberly D Williams, Keshab Subedi, Charmaine S Wright, Lee M Pachter, Sophie Lanzkron
{"title":"Attitudes and Beliefs Regarding Pain and Discrimination Among Black Adults with Sickle Cell Disease: A Mixed Methods Evaluation of an Adapted Chronic Pain Intervention.","authors":"Stephanie Howe Guarino, Olusegun Bakare, Carolyn M Jenkins, Kimberly D Williams, Keshab Subedi, Charmaine S Wright, Lee M Pachter, Sophie Lanzkron","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S469999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study sought to adapt a chronic pain group curriculum for adults with sickle cell disease (SCD). Given the association of experiences of racism and discrimination with health outcomes, this study also explored how such experiences for patients with SCD impact their interactions with clinicians and health-care systems.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This mixed methods study recruited patients (aged ≥18 years) in a sickle cell treatment program; all self-identified as Black or African American. Key informant interviews evaluated a chronic pain program curriculum and rated the curriculum sessions' importance for SCD pain management. A survey containing six validated instruments then measured experiences of pain and discrimination, level of emotional expressivity, and trust in physicians and health insurers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 19 adult patients approached, 12 (63%) completed the interview and survey. Interview data analysis resulted in five themes comprising pain, treatment, mental/emotional, health-care clinicians, and differences in SCD versus other chronic conditions. Each curriculum session was rated as \"very important\" or \"important\" by participants. Most described at least one experience of racism or discrimination in the medical setting and identified clinicians' lack of knowledge as a barrier to appropriate SCD care. Participants identified the importance of non-pharmacological treatments for SCD pain and appropriately managing pain caused by comorbid chronic conditions. Conversely, survey responses reported moderate levels of pain, infrequent discriminatory experiences in the medical setting, and moderate trust in medical professionals, whereas most reported experiences of discrimination in general settings. Many participants reported they either accepted it or did nothing in response to discriminatory experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Study findings emphasize the need to address experiences of racism and stigma in addition to experiences of emotional and physical pain among patients with SCD in the context of pain management. Findings from this study will inform the development of a SCD pain group curriculum for adult patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"3601-3618"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11550914/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S469999","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study sought to adapt a chronic pain group curriculum for adults with sickle cell disease (SCD). Given the association of experiences of racism and discrimination with health outcomes, this study also explored how such experiences for patients with SCD impact their interactions with clinicians and health-care systems.
Patients and methods: This mixed methods study recruited patients (aged ≥18 years) in a sickle cell treatment program; all self-identified as Black or African American. Key informant interviews evaluated a chronic pain program curriculum and rated the curriculum sessions' importance for SCD pain management. A survey containing six validated instruments then measured experiences of pain and discrimination, level of emotional expressivity, and trust in physicians and health insurers.
Results: Of the 19 adult patients approached, 12 (63%) completed the interview and survey. Interview data analysis resulted in five themes comprising pain, treatment, mental/emotional, health-care clinicians, and differences in SCD versus other chronic conditions. Each curriculum session was rated as "very important" or "important" by participants. Most described at least one experience of racism or discrimination in the medical setting and identified clinicians' lack of knowledge as a barrier to appropriate SCD care. Participants identified the importance of non-pharmacological treatments for SCD pain and appropriately managing pain caused by comorbid chronic conditions. Conversely, survey responses reported moderate levels of pain, infrequent discriminatory experiences in the medical setting, and moderate trust in medical professionals, whereas most reported experiences of discrimination in general settings. Many participants reported they either accepted it or did nothing in response to discriminatory experiences.
Conclusion: Study findings emphasize the need to address experiences of racism and stigma in addition to experiences of emotional and physical pain among patients with SCD in the context of pain management. Findings from this study will inform the development of a SCD pain group curriculum for adult patients.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.