The Phase 3 KEYLYNK-006 Study of Pembrolizumab plus Olaparib versus Pembrolizumab plus Pemetrexed as Maintenance Therapy for Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

IF 21 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Jhanelle E Gray, Michael Schenker, Mehmet Ali Nahit Şendur, Viktoriya Leonova, Dariusz Kowalski, Terufumi Kato, Rashida Orlova, James Chih-Hsin Yang, Adrian Langleben, Arnold Pilz, Andrei Ungureanu, Milena Perez Mak, Flavia De Angelis, Himani Aggarwal, Zachary Zimmer, Bin Zhao, Mark Shamoun, Tae Min Kim
{"title":"The Phase 3 KEYLYNK-006 Study of Pembrolizumab plus Olaparib versus Pembrolizumab plus Pemetrexed as Maintenance Therapy for Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.","authors":"Jhanelle E Gray, Michael Schenker, Mehmet Ali Nahit Şendur, Viktoriya Leonova, Dariusz Kowalski, Terufumi Kato, Rashida Orlova, James Chih-Hsin Yang, Adrian Langleben, Arnold Pilz, Andrei Ungureanu, Milena Perez Mak, Flavia De Angelis, Himani Aggarwal, Zachary Zimmer, Bin Zhao, Mark Shamoun, Tae Min Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.jtho.2024.10.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poly (ADP-ribose) inhibitors, including olaparib, upregulate programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), which may increase efficacy of anti-PD-(L)1 therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the phase 3 KEYLYNK-006 trial (NCT03976323), eligible adults with previously untreated metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC without targetable genetic alterations who had complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) following induction therapy with 4 cycles of pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W, pemetrexed 500 mg/m<sup>2</sup> , and carboplatin AUC5 or cisplatin 75 mg/m<sup>2</sup> were randomized 1:1 to olaparib 300 mg orally twice daily or pemetrexed Q3W, both given with ≤31 cycles of pembrolizumab Q3W. Dual primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). PFS was tested at interim analysis 2 (IA2; ie, final PFS analysis), OS at final analysis (FA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1003 patients who received induction therapy, 672 (67.0%) were randomized to pembrolizumab plus olaparib (n=337) or pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed (n=335) in the intention-to-treat population. Median follow-up at FA was 39.9 (range, 28.1-51.5) months. At IA2, median (95% CI) PFS was 7.1 (5.6-8.7) months versus 8.3 (6.9-11.5) months in the olaparib versus pemetrexed groups (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.92-1.36; P=0.87). At FA, median (95% CI) OS was 20.7 (18.0-24.8) months versus 23.0 (19.0-26.4) months (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.87-1.25; P=0.6649). Grade 3-5 maintenance treatment-related AEs occurred in 26.1% versus 30.1% patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib did not improve PFS or OS versus pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed in previously untreated metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC without targetable genetic alterations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17515,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":21.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2024.10.026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Poly (ADP-ribose) inhibitors, including olaparib, upregulate programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), which may increase efficacy of anti-PD-(L)1 therapies.

Methods: In the phase 3 KEYLYNK-006 trial (NCT03976323), eligible adults with previously untreated metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC without targetable genetic alterations who had complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) following induction therapy with 4 cycles of pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W, pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 , and carboplatin AUC5 or cisplatin 75 mg/m2 were randomized 1:1 to olaparib 300 mg orally twice daily or pemetrexed Q3W, both given with ≤31 cycles of pembrolizumab Q3W. Dual primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). PFS was tested at interim analysis 2 (IA2; ie, final PFS analysis), OS at final analysis (FA).

Results: Of 1003 patients who received induction therapy, 672 (67.0%) were randomized to pembrolizumab plus olaparib (n=337) or pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed (n=335) in the intention-to-treat population. Median follow-up at FA was 39.9 (range, 28.1-51.5) months. At IA2, median (95% CI) PFS was 7.1 (5.6-8.7) months versus 8.3 (6.9-11.5) months in the olaparib versus pemetrexed groups (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.92-1.36; P=0.87). At FA, median (95% CI) OS was 20.7 (18.0-24.8) months versus 23.0 (19.0-26.4) months (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.87-1.25; P=0.6649). Grade 3-5 maintenance treatment-related AEs occurred in 26.1% versus 30.1% patients.

Conclusion: Pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib did not improve PFS or OS versus pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed in previously untreated metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC without targetable genetic alterations.

Pembrolizumab联合Olaparib与Pembrolizumab联合培美曲塞作为转移性非鳞状非小细胞肺癌维持疗法的3期KEYLYNK-006研究。
背景:包括奥拉帕利在内的聚(ADP-核糖)抑制剂会上调程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1),这可能会提高抗PD-(L)1疗法的疗效:在 KEYLYNK-006 3 期试验(NCT03976323)中,符合条件的既往未接受过治疗的转移性非鳞状 NSCLC 患者,如果没有可靶向的基因改变,且在接受 4 个周期的诱导治疗后出现完全应答 (CR)、部分应答 (PR) 或疾病稳定 (SD),则随机分为 1:奥拉帕利(olaparib)300 毫克,口服,每天两次,或培美曲塞 Q3W,均与≤31 个周期的 pembrolizumab Q3W 同时进行。双重主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。无进展生存期在中期分析2(IA2;即最终无进展生存期分析)时进行检测,OS在最终分析(FA)时进行检测:在1003名接受诱导治疗的患者中,672人(67.0%)随机接受了pembrolizumab联合奥拉帕利(337人)或pembrolizumab联合培美曲塞(335人)的意向治疗。FA的中位随访时间为39.9个月(28.1-51.5个月)。在IA2,奥拉帕利与培美曲塞组的中位(95% CI)PFS分别为7.1(5.6-8.7)个月和8.3(6.9-11.5)个月(HR,1.12;95% CI,0.92-1.36;P=0.87)。在FA,中位(95% CI)OS为20.7(18.0-24.8)个月对23.0(19.0-26.4)个月(HR,1.04;95% CI,0.87-1.25;P=0.6649)。3-5级维持治疗相关AE发生率为26.1%对30.1%:Pembrolizumab联合奥拉帕利维持治疗与Pembrolizumab联合培美曲塞相比,并不能改善既往未经治疗的无靶向基因改变的转移性非鳞状NSCLC患者的PFS或OS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Journal of Thoracic Oncology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
36.00
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1406
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Thoracic Oncology (JTO), the official journal of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer,is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to the prevention, detection, diagnosis, and treatment of all thoracic malignancies.The readship includes epidemiologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, thoracic surgeons, pulmonologists, radiologists, pathologists, nuclear medicine physicians, and research scientists with a special interest in thoracic oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信