Superb Microvascular Imaging Is Better Than Power Doppler Ultrasound in Diagnosing Subclinical Synovitis in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis in Remission.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 ACOUSTICS
Esin Kurtulus Ozturk, Ayse Bahar Kelesoglu Dincer, Saffet Ozturk
{"title":"Superb Microvascular Imaging Is Better Than Power Doppler Ultrasound in Diagnosing Subclinical Synovitis in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis in Remission.","authors":"Esin Kurtulus Ozturk, Ayse Bahar Kelesoglu Dincer, Saffet Ozturk","doi":"10.1002/jcu.23891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the value and reliability of superb microvascular imaging (SMI) in detecting subclinical synovial inflammation in patients with inflammatory arthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients with inflammatory arthritis who had achieved clinical remission were retrospectively analyzed and evaluated with SMI and power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS). Subclinical synovitis was graded by a semiquantitative score (0-3) for each imaging method. Imaging findings and synovitis scores were compared between the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) group and non-RA group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty RA patients with 270 joints and 38 non-RA patients with 112 joints were recruited. In all patients, the remission rates of SMI and PDUS were 73.7% and 79.7%, respectively. The remission rates by SMI were found lower and the sensitivity of SMI was higher than PDUS in both RA and non-RA groups. Compared with PDUS, the number of joint count with synovial vascular flow signals was found to be significantly higher in SMI in each group (p < 0.001). Moreover, semiquantitative ultrasound scores were found significantly higher with SMI in each joint (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SMI appears to be better than PDUS in detecting synovial signals in terms of joint number and vascularity scoring in monitoring disease activity in patients with inflammatory arthritis in clinical remission. Future research should focus on SMI and new ultrasound-based activity scores to identify and achieve true remission.</p>","PeriodicalId":15386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.23891","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the value and reliability of superb microvascular imaging (SMI) in detecting subclinical synovial inflammation in patients with inflammatory arthritis.

Methods: All patients with inflammatory arthritis who had achieved clinical remission were retrospectively analyzed and evaluated with SMI and power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS). Subclinical synovitis was graded by a semiquantitative score (0-3) for each imaging method. Imaging findings and synovitis scores were compared between the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) group and non-RA group.

Results: Eighty RA patients with 270 joints and 38 non-RA patients with 112 joints were recruited. In all patients, the remission rates of SMI and PDUS were 73.7% and 79.7%, respectively. The remission rates by SMI were found lower and the sensitivity of SMI was higher than PDUS in both RA and non-RA groups. Compared with PDUS, the number of joint count with synovial vascular flow signals was found to be significantly higher in SMI in each group (p < 0.001). Moreover, semiquantitative ultrasound scores were found significantly higher with SMI in each joint (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: SMI appears to be better than PDUS in detecting synovial signals in terms of joint number and vascularity scoring in monitoring disease activity in patients with inflammatory arthritis in clinical remission. Future research should focus on SMI and new ultrasound-based activity scores to identify and achieve true remission.

在诊断炎症性关节炎缓解期患者的亚临床滑膜炎方面,超微血管成像优于动力多普勒超声。
研究目的本研究旨在探讨超级微血管成像(SMI)在检测炎症性关节炎患者亚临床滑膜炎症方面的价值和可靠性:对所有临床缓解的炎症性关节炎患者进行回顾性分析,并使用 SMI 和动力多普勒超声(PDUS)进行评估。每种影像学方法均采用半定量评分(0-3 分)对亚临床滑膜炎进行分级。比较类风湿性关节炎(RA)组与非类风湿性关节炎组的成像结果和滑膜炎评分:结果:共招募了 80 名类风湿关节炎患者(270 个关节)和 38 名非类风湿关节炎患者(112 个关节)。在所有患者中,SMI 和 PDUS 的缓解率分别为 73.7% 和 79.7%。在 RA 组和非 RA 组中,SMI 的缓解率均低于 PDUS,而 SMI 的灵敏度则高于 PDUS。与 PDUS 相比,SMI 发现各组中带有滑膜血管血流信号的关节数明显较多(P 结论:SMI 似乎比 PDUS 更好:在临床缓解期炎症性关节炎患者的疾病活动监测中,SMI 在关节数量和血管性评分方面检测滑膜信号的效果似乎优于 PDUS。未来的研究应重点关注 SMI 和基于超声的新活动度评分,以识别和实现真正的缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Ultrasound (JCU) is an international journal dedicated to the worldwide dissemination of scientific information on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of medical sonography. The scope of the journal includes--but is not limited to--the following areas: sonography of the gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tract, vascular system, nervous system, head and neck, chest, breast, musculoskeletal system, and other superficial structures; Doppler applications; obstetric and pediatric applications; and interventional sonography. Studies comparing sonography with other imaging modalities are encouraged, as are studies evaluating the economic impact of sonography. Also within the journal''s scope are innovations and improvements in instrumentation and examination techniques and the use of contrast agents. JCU publishes original research articles, case reports, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letters to the editor. The journal is also dedicated to being an educational resource for its readers, through the publication of review articles and various scientific contributions from members of the editorial board and other world-renowned experts in sonography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信