Superb Microvascular Imaging Is Better Than Power Doppler Ultrasound in Diagnosing Subclinical Synovitis in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis in Remission.
{"title":"Superb Microvascular Imaging Is Better Than Power Doppler Ultrasound in Diagnosing Subclinical Synovitis in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis in Remission.","authors":"Esin Kurtulus Ozturk, Ayse Bahar Kelesoglu Dincer, Saffet Ozturk","doi":"10.1002/jcu.23891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the value and reliability of superb microvascular imaging (SMI) in detecting subclinical synovial inflammation in patients with inflammatory arthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients with inflammatory arthritis who had achieved clinical remission were retrospectively analyzed and evaluated with SMI and power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS). Subclinical synovitis was graded by a semiquantitative score (0-3) for each imaging method. Imaging findings and synovitis scores were compared between the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) group and non-RA group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty RA patients with 270 joints and 38 non-RA patients with 112 joints were recruited. In all patients, the remission rates of SMI and PDUS were 73.7% and 79.7%, respectively. The remission rates by SMI were found lower and the sensitivity of SMI was higher than PDUS in both RA and non-RA groups. Compared with PDUS, the number of joint count with synovial vascular flow signals was found to be significantly higher in SMI in each group (p < 0.001). Moreover, semiquantitative ultrasound scores were found significantly higher with SMI in each joint (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SMI appears to be better than PDUS in detecting synovial signals in terms of joint number and vascularity scoring in monitoring disease activity in patients with inflammatory arthritis in clinical remission. Future research should focus on SMI and new ultrasound-based activity scores to identify and achieve true remission.</p>","PeriodicalId":15386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.23891","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the value and reliability of superb microvascular imaging (SMI) in detecting subclinical synovial inflammation in patients with inflammatory arthritis.
Methods: All patients with inflammatory arthritis who had achieved clinical remission were retrospectively analyzed and evaluated with SMI and power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS). Subclinical synovitis was graded by a semiquantitative score (0-3) for each imaging method. Imaging findings and synovitis scores were compared between the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) group and non-RA group.
Results: Eighty RA patients with 270 joints and 38 non-RA patients with 112 joints were recruited. In all patients, the remission rates of SMI and PDUS were 73.7% and 79.7%, respectively. The remission rates by SMI were found lower and the sensitivity of SMI was higher than PDUS in both RA and non-RA groups. Compared with PDUS, the number of joint count with synovial vascular flow signals was found to be significantly higher in SMI in each group (p < 0.001). Moreover, semiquantitative ultrasound scores were found significantly higher with SMI in each joint (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: SMI appears to be better than PDUS in detecting synovial signals in terms of joint number and vascularity scoring in monitoring disease activity in patients with inflammatory arthritis in clinical remission. Future research should focus on SMI and new ultrasound-based activity scores to identify and achieve true remission.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Ultrasound (JCU) is an international journal dedicated to the worldwide dissemination of scientific information on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of medical sonography.
The scope of the journal includes--but is not limited to--the following areas: sonography of the gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tract, vascular system, nervous system, head and neck, chest, breast, musculoskeletal system, and other superficial structures; Doppler applications; obstetric and pediatric applications; and interventional sonography. Studies comparing sonography with other imaging modalities are encouraged, as are studies evaluating the economic impact of sonography. Also within the journal''s scope are innovations and improvements in instrumentation and examination techniques and the use of contrast agents.
JCU publishes original research articles, case reports, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letters to the editor. The journal is also dedicated to being an educational resource for its readers, through the publication of review articles and various scientific contributions from members of the editorial board and other world-renowned experts in sonography.