Jeya Anandakumar , Htun Ja Mai , Natalie BV Riblet , Hena Waseem
{"title":"Telehealth interventions for stroke management and rehabilitation in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review","authors":"Jeya Anandakumar , Htun Ja Mai , Natalie BV Riblet , Hena Waseem","doi":"10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The burden of stroke is higher in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) than in high-income countries due to the lack of stroke care centers, stroke specialist, and rehabilitation access. One way to increase access to stroke care in LMICs is through the use of telehealth.</div></div><div><h3>Material & method</h3><div>We performed a scoping review to summarize the evidence on telehealth in LMICs. We searched Medline, SCOPUS, and Web of Science through February 18th, 2022. Reviewers screened for studies reporting on health outcomes following telehealth interventions (imaging, thrombolysis, and rehabilitation) in LMICs. We included all study designs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 259 studies, 10 studies met the eligibility criteria. Nine reported on functional or disability measures, 6 reported on cerebral infarction or intracerebral hemorrhage, 5 reported on door-to-needle time to thrombolysis, and 6 reported on mortality rate. Out of 9 studies, 8 reported that the use of telehealth for stroke management and rehabilitation in LMICs has led to a decrease in the degree of post-stroke disability. However, the comparison group may have received no rehabilitation treatment at all in LMICs. All 5 studies that measured administration of thrombolytic therapy in respective telehealth interventions were within the recommended 3-hour time window. Studies with a comparison arm found that there was no significant difference in mortality and cerebral infarction/intracerebral hemorrhage rates between telehealth and control.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Evidence from this review suggests that telehealth may improve post-stroke disability and facilitate the timely administration of thrombolytics therapy within the 3-hour window by allowing remote access to distant tertiary stroke care center in situations where it would otherwise be delayed in LMICs due to logistical barriers such as an extended travel time. Further research using randomized and quasi-experimental studies are needed in LMICs to determine the overall effectiveness of telehealth intervention for stroke management and rehabilitation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15487,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 110906"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586824004454","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The burden of stroke is higher in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) than in high-income countries due to the lack of stroke care centers, stroke specialist, and rehabilitation access. One way to increase access to stroke care in LMICs is through the use of telehealth.
Material & method
We performed a scoping review to summarize the evidence on telehealth in LMICs. We searched Medline, SCOPUS, and Web of Science through February 18th, 2022. Reviewers screened for studies reporting on health outcomes following telehealth interventions (imaging, thrombolysis, and rehabilitation) in LMICs. We included all study designs.
Results
Out of 259 studies, 10 studies met the eligibility criteria. Nine reported on functional or disability measures, 6 reported on cerebral infarction or intracerebral hemorrhage, 5 reported on door-to-needle time to thrombolysis, and 6 reported on mortality rate. Out of 9 studies, 8 reported that the use of telehealth for stroke management and rehabilitation in LMICs has led to a decrease in the degree of post-stroke disability. However, the comparison group may have received no rehabilitation treatment at all in LMICs. All 5 studies that measured administration of thrombolytic therapy in respective telehealth interventions were within the recommended 3-hour time window. Studies with a comparison arm found that there was no significant difference in mortality and cerebral infarction/intracerebral hemorrhage rates between telehealth and control.
Conclusion
Evidence from this review suggests that telehealth may improve post-stroke disability and facilitate the timely administration of thrombolytics therapy within the 3-hour window by allowing remote access to distant tertiary stroke care center in situations where it would otherwise be delayed in LMICs due to logistical barriers such as an extended travel time. Further research using randomized and quasi-experimental studies are needed in LMICs to determine the overall effectiveness of telehealth intervention for stroke management and rehabilitation.
期刊介绍:
This International journal, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, publishes articles on clinical neurosurgery and neurology and the related neurosciences such as neuro-pathology, neuro-radiology, neuro-ophthalmology and neuro-physiology.
The journal has a broad International perspective, and emphasises the advances occurring in Asia, the Pacific Rim region, Europe and North America. The Journal acts as a focus for publication of major clinical and laboratory research, as well as publishing solicited manuscripts on specific subjects from experts, case reports and other information of interest to clinicians working in the clinical neurosciences.