Safety and Effectiveness of Urologist-Directed Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Pancreatolithiasis.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Journal of endourology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1089/end.2024.0402
Ridwan Alam, Yasin Bhanji, Mark N Alshak, Matthew J Rabinowitz, Oscar Li, Gregory A Joice, Hiten D Patel, Jared S Winoker, Brian R Matlaga
{"title":"Safety and Effectiveness of Urologist-Directed Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Pancreatolithiasis.","authors":"Ridwan Alam, Yasin Bhanji, Mark N Alshak, Matthew J Rabinowitz, Oscar Li, Gregory A Joice, Hiten D Patel, Jared S Winoker, Brian R Matlaga","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) can be used in conjunction with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for the treatment of large (≥5 mm) or impacted pancreatolithiasis. We report our experience demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of urologist-directed SWL for pancreatolithiasis. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We performed a retrospective review of all patients undergoing SWL for pancreatolithiasis at our institution between 2016 and 2020. We defined a treatment cycle as one in which the patient underwent a predefined number of SWL procedures prior to performance of a post-SWL ERCP. Stone-free status was defined as the absence of stone fragments at post-SWL ERCP. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine characteristics associated with stone persistence after a treatment cycle. <b><i>Results:</i></b> There were 44 patients who underwent 59 treatment cycles consisting of 118 pancreatic SWL procedures. Forty-two cycles (71.2%) were staged, and 17 (28.8%) were not staged. The median size of the largest pancreatic stone was 9 mm [IQR 6-11] and was impacted in 38 cases (64.4%). Patients reported pain in 51 cases (86.4%), of which 28 required the use of opioid analgesics. Patients were rendered stone free in 38 cycles (64.4%). Pain improvement was noted in 39 cases (66.1%), and the reduction in opioid use was statistically significant (28 cases vs. 10 cases, <i>P</i> = 0.004). Impacted stones were associated with an increased odds of stone persistence (OR 7.04, 95% CI 1.14-43.43, <i>P</i> = 0.04). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In this joint venture with gastroenterology, we demonstrate that urologist-directed SWL for pancreatolithiasis is safe, effective, and in line with published rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":"1415-1420"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0402","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) can be used in conjunction with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for the treatment of large (≥5 mm) or impacted pancreatolithiasis. We report our experience demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of urologist-directed SWL for pancreatolithiasis. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all patients undergoing SWL for pancreatolithiasis at our institution between 2016 and 2020. We defined a treatment cycle as one in which the patient underwent a predefined number of SWL procedures prior to performance of a post-SWL ERCP. Stone-free status was defined as the absence of stone fragments at post-SWL ERCP. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine characteristics associated with stone persistence after a treatment cycle. Results: There were 44 patients who underwent 59 treatment cycles consisting of 118 pancreatic SWL procedures. Forty-two cycles (71.2%) were staged, and 17 (28.8%) were not staged. The median size of the largest pancreatic stone was 9 mm [IQR 6-11] and was impacted in 38 cases (64.4%). Patients reported pain in 51 cases (86.4%), of which 28 required the use of opioid analgesics. Patients were rendered stone free in 38 cycles (64.4%). Pain improvement was noted in 39 cases (66.1%), and the reduction in opioid use was statistically significant (28 cases vs. 10 cases, P = 0.004). Impacted stones were associated with an increased odds of stone persistence (OR 7.04, 95% CI 1.14-43.43, P = 0.04). Conclusions: In this joint venture with gastroenterology, we demonstrate that urologist-directed SWL for pancreatolithiasis is safe, effective, and in line with published rates.

泌尿科医生指导的体外冲击波碎石治疗胰腺结石的安全性和有效性。
简介:体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)可与内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)结合使用,用于治疗大块(≥5 毫米)或撞击性胰腺结石。我们报告了我们的经验,证明了泌尿科医生指导的 SWL 治疗胰腺结石的安全性和有效性。方法:我们对 2016 年至 2020 年期间在我院接受 SWL 治疗胰腺结石的所有患者进行了回顾性审查。我们将治疗周期定义为:患者在接受 SWL 后 ERCP 之前接受了预定次数的 SWL 手术。无结石状态的定义是在SWL术后ERCP检查中未发现结石碎片。进行多变量逻辑回归以确定与治疗周期后结石持续存在相关的特征。结果:44名患者接受了59个治疗周期,包括118次胰腺SWL手术。42个周期(71.2%)进行了分期,17个周期(28.8%)未进行分期。最大胰腺结石的中位尺寸为 9 毫米[IQR 6-11],38 例(64.4%)结石有撞击感。51例(86.4%)患者报告疼痛,其中28例需要使用阿片类镇痛药。38例(64.4%)患者无结石。39例(66.1%)患者的疼痛有所改善,阿片类镇痛药用量的减少具有统计学意义(28例 vs. 10例,P = 0.004)。受影响的结石与结石持续存在的几率增加有关(OR 7.04,95% CI 1.14-43.43,P = 0.04)。结论:在这项与消化内科的联合研究中,我们证明了泌尿科医生指导的胰腺结石 SWL 是安全、有效的,并且符合已公布的比率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信